Cited by 461Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Transcription factor-mediated differentiation of human iPSCs into neurons

Open access
Fernandopulle, Michael S., Prestil, Ryan, Grunseich, Christopher, Wang, Chao, Gan, Li, Ward, Michael E.·2018·Current Protocols in Cell Biology

Abstract

Accurate modeling of human neuronal cell biology has been a long‐standing challenge. However, methods to differentiate human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to neurons have recently provided experimentally tractable cell models. Numerous methods that use small molecules to direct iPSCs into neuronal lineages have arisen in recent years. Unfortunately, these methods entail numerous challenges, including poor efficiency, variable cell type heterogeneity, and lengthy, expensive differentiation procedures. We recently developed a new method to generate stable transgenic lines of human iPSCs with doxycycline‐inducible transcription factors at safe‐harbor loci. Using a simple two‐step protocol, these lines can be inducibly differentiated into either cortical (i 3 Neurons) or lower motor neurons (i 3 LMN) in a rapid, efficient, and scalable manner (Wang et al., 2017). In this manuscript, we describe a set of protocols to assist investigators in the culture and genetic engineering of iPSC lines to enable transcription factor–mediated differentiation of iPSCs into i 3 Neurons or i 3 LMNs, and we present neuronal culture conditions for various experimental applications. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpcb.51

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transcription factor driven differentiation protocols demonstrate greater reproducibility, purity, and decreased cost/generation time.

    “Whilst protocols using transcription factor driven differentiation can overcome some of these challenges, demonstrating greater reproducibility, purity, and decreased cost/generation time12–14”

    From Examining iPSC derived motor neuron variability and genome stability monitoring as a solution (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Commentary’s Background Information says integrated transcription factors enable uniformly efficient differentiation and that TF-based methods offer higher purity and a shorter timeline than small-molecule methods. The Introduction describes small-molecule methods as variable and expensive, but our copy does not establish that TF-based differentiation costs less. No page numbers are available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The i3Neuron platform yields large numbers of highly uniform neurons, which is necessary for robust population-based screens.

    “which yields large quantities of highly homogeneous neurons, a prerequisite for robust population-based screens.”
  • Ngn2-driven generation yields glutamatergic neurons.

    “In addition to the Ngn2-driven generation of glutamatergic neurons (Fernandopulle et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2013) used here”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernandopulle, M. S., Prestil, R., Grunseich, C., Wang, C., Gan, L., & Ward, M. E.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Gladstone Institutes (US)
Venue
Current Protocols in Cell Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-05-18
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
e51-e51
ISSN
  • 1934-2500 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-2616
OpenAlex
W2803819386
Cited by
461
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Protocols in Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 NS999999)
  • National Institute on Aging (F30AG060722)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (ZIANS003155)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
induced pluripotent stem cells, neuronal differentiation, transcription factors, doxycycline-inducible expression, cortical neurons, lower motor neurons, small molecule differentiation
MeSH terms
Cell Differentiation, Cell Separation, Cells, Cultured, Chromatography, Affinity, Edetic Acid, Freezing, Humans, Lipids, Motor Neurons, Transcription Factors, Transfection, Reproducibility of Results, Cell Culture Techniques, Transgenes, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Genotyping Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review