Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Moral Injury Questionnaire—Military Version

Open access
Currier, Joseph M., Holland, Jason M., Drescher, Kent, Foy, David·2015·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

Moral injury is an emerging construct related to negative consequences associated with war‐zone stressors that transgress military veterans' deeply held values/beliefs. Given the newness of the construct, there is a need for instrumentation that might assess morally injurious experiences (MIEs) in this population. Drawing on a community sample of 131 Iraq and/or Afghanistan Veterans and clinical sample of 82 returning Veterans, we conducted an initial psychometric evaluation of the newly developed Moral Injury Questionnaire—Military version (MIQ‐M)—a 20‐item self‐report measure for assessing MIEs. Possibly due to low rates of reporting, an item assessing sexual trauma did not yield favourable psychometric properties and was excluded from analyses. Veterans in the clinical sample endorsed significantly higher scores across MIQ‐M items. Factor analytic results for the final 19 items supported a unidimensional structure, and convergent validity analyses revealed that higher scores (indicative of more MIEs) were correlated with greater general combat exposure, impairments in work/social functioning, posttraumatic stress and depression in the community sample. In addition, when controlling for demographics, deployment‐related factors and exposure to life threat stressors associated with combat, tests of incremental validity indicated that MIQ‐M scores were also uniquely linked with suicide risk and other mental health outcomes. These findings provide preliminary evidence for the validity of the MIQ‐M and support the applicability of this measure for further research and clinical work with Veterans. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Key Practitioner Message: Military service can confront service members with experiences that undermine their core sense of humanity and violate global values and beliefs. These types of experiences increase the risk for posttraumatic maladjustment in this population, even when accounting for rates of exposure to life threat traumas. Moral injury is an emerging construct to more fully capture the many possible psychological, ethical, and spiritual/existential challenges among persons who served in modern wars and other trauma‐exposed professional groups. There is currently a need for psychometrically sound instrumentation for assessing morally injurious experiences (MIEs). The Moral Injury Questionnaire – Military Version (MIQ-M) was developed to provide a tool for assessing possible MIEs among military populations. This study provides preliminary evidence of the validity – including factorial, concurrent, and incremental – and clinical utility of the MIQ‐M for further applications in clinical and research contexts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.1866

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. American Psychiatric Association, 1994, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  2. 10.1023/A:1024453618638 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.272 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1007/BF00227593 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Currier J.M., Involvement in abusive violence among Vietnam Veterans: Direct and indirect associations with substance abuse problems and suicidality, Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
  6. 10.1509/jmkr.38.2.269.18845 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Drescher K. Currier J.M. Lisman R. &Foy D.(2013).Spiritual correlates of health quality among veterans with PTSD. Manuscript currently under review.
  8. 10.1177/1534765610395615 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Fabrigar L.R., 2012, Exploratory factor analysis: Understanding statistics
  10. 10.1023/A:1026490117121 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Flipse Vargas A., Moral injury themes in combat Veterans' narrative responses from the National Vietnam Veterans' Readjustment Study (NVVRS), Traumatology
  12. 10.1097/01.nmd.0000138224.17375.55 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gray M.J., Adaptive disclosure: An open trial of a novel exposure‐based intervention for service members with combat‐related psychological stress injuries, Behavior Therapy
  14. Grossman D., 2009, On killing: The psychological cost of learning to kill in war and society
  15. 10.1002/jclp.21900 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/jclp.20777 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1002/jts.2490080109 · DOI
  18. 10.1001/jama.295.9.1023 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1037/1040-3590.1.1.53 · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.1.1.53 · Paper page
  20. 10.2307/2136705 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1080/08995600701386358 · DOI
  22. Maguen S., 2012, Moral injury in veterans of war, PTSD Research Quarterly, 23, 1
  23. 10.1002/jts.20434 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1002/jts.20451 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1037/a0019897 · DOI
  27. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.341 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Shay J., 1995, Achilles in Vietnam: Combat trauma and the undoing of character
  29. 10.1136/bmj.39430.638241.AE · DOI · Paper page
  30. Steenkamp M.M., 2010, A brief exposure‐based intervention for service members with PTSD, Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 1, 98
  31. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.54 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1002/jts.20487 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.2105/AJPH.2008.155432 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1023/B:JOTS.0000029270.47848.e5 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Currier, J. M., Holland, J. M., Drescher, K., & Foy, D.
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-10
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
54-63
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W1482545459
Cited by
285
References
9
FWCI
8.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.