Cited by 39Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Comparing the acceptability of a positive psychology intervention versus a cognitive behavioural therapy for clinical depression

Lopez‐Gomez, Irene, Chaves, Covadonga, Hervas, Gonzalo, Vazquez, Carmelo·2017·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

There is growing evidence on the efficacy of positive psychology interventions (PPI) to treat clinical disorders. However, very few studies have addressed their acceptability. The present study aimed to analyse 2 key components of acceptability (i.e., client satisfaction and adherence to treatment) of a new PPI programme, the Integrative Positive Psychological Intervention for Depression (IPPI‐D), in comparison to a standard cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) programme in the treatment of clinical depression. One hundred twenty‐eight women with a DSM‐IV diagnosis of major depression or dysthymia were allocated to a 10‐session IPPI‐D or CBT group intervention condition. Results showed that both interventions were highly acceptable for participants. Attendance rates were high, and there were no significant differences between conditions. However, the IPPI‐D condition showed significantly higher client satisfaction than the CBT condition. Moreover, acceptability did not differ based on participants' severity of symptoms, regardless of condition. These findings encourage further investigations of the applicability of PPI in clinical settings in order to broaden the range of acceptable and suitable therapies for depressed patients. Key Practitioner Message: This study sheds light on the client satisfaction and adherence to a positive intervention. For participants, positive psychology interventions (PPI) may be more satisfactory than CBT as PPI are framed within a positive mental health model and, consequently, may reduce the risk of stigmatization Because acceptability of treatments and preferences may affect the efficacy of treatments, this study provides an excellent opportunity to offer professionals more therapeutic options to tailor treatments to clients' needs and expectations

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.2129

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lopez‐Gomez, I., Chaves, C., Hervas, G., & Vazquez, C.
Affiliations
  • Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Psychology Complutense University of Madrid Madrid Spain
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-30
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
1029-1039
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W2751953740
Cited by
39
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (PSI2015-69253-R)
  • Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports (FPU12/02342)
  • Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness - Networks of Excellence (PSI2014-56303-REDT)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
positive psychology interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy, major depressive disorder, treatment acceptability, client satisfaction, medication adherence, dysthymia, women, stigma
MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review