The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stimulatory effect of brussels sprouts and cabbage on human drug metabolism
Abstract
Ten healthy volunteers were fed (1) a control diet for 10 days, (2) the same control diet for 3 additional days and a brussels sprouts and cabbage‐containing diet for the next 7 days, and (3) the control diet for the 10 subsequent days. Antipyrine and phenacetin were administered orally before breakfast on days 7 and 10, respectively, of each dietary regimen. During the test diet period the mean plasma half‐life of antipyrine decreased 13% and the mean metabolic clearance rate increased 11%. While small, these changes were statistically significant, indicating a stimulatory effect of cabbage and brussels sprouts on antipyrine metabolism. The values returned to control levels during the second control diet period. During the test diet period the mean plasma concentration of phenacetin was decreased by 34% to 67% at each time interval from 0.5 to 7 hr after phenacetin administration, and the mean plasma concentration of total (conjugated plus unconjugated) N‐acetyl‐p‐aminophenol (APAP), phenacetin's major metabolite, was increased from 0.5 to 3 hr after phenacetin administration. The concentrations of phenacetin and APAP returned toward control values during the second control diet period. The mean plasma half‐life of phenacetin was not influenced by the dietary changes. These results suggest that the test diet enhanced the metabolism of phenacetin in the gastrointestinal tract and/or during its first pass through the liver. Feeding the test diet increased the mean ratio of conjugated APAP to unconjugated APAP observed in plasma at each time interval from 0.5 to 7 hr after phenacetin administration, suggesting that the diet enhanced the conjugation of APAP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. I. Epidemiology
Steinmetz, K. A., & Potter, J. D. (1991) · Cancer Causes and Control · doi:10.1007/bf00051672 · Cited by 1,118
Health effects of vegetables and fruit: assessing mechanisms of action in human experimental studies
Lampe, J. W. (1999) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/70.3.475s · Cited by 786
Role of Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism in Drug Discovery and Development
Lin, J. H., & Lu, A. Y. H. (1997) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01340-1 · Cited by 708
Interindividual Variability in Inhibition and Induction of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes
Lin, J. H., & Lu, A. Y. (2001) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.535 · Cited by 285
Contributions of Human Enzymes in Carcinogen Metabolism
Rendic, S., & Guengerich, F. P. (2012) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx300132k · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Pantuck, E. J., Pantuck, C. B., Garland, W. A., Min, B. H., Wattenberg, L. W., Anderson, K. E., Kappas, A., & Conney, A. H.
- Venue
- Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 88-95
- ISSN
- 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6535
- OpenAlex
- W2410785625
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stimulatory effect of brussels sprouts and cabbage on human drug metabolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cpt197925188
- The paper
- Pantuck, E. J., Pantuck, C. B., Garland, W. A., Min, B. H., Wattenberg, L. W., Anderson, K. E., Kappas, A., & Conney, A. H. (1979). Stimulatory effect of brussels sprouts and cabbage on human drug metabolism. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt197925188
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.