Cited by 56

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stakeholder engagement mechanisms and their contribution to eco‐innovation: Differentiated effects of communication and cooperation

Garcés‐Ayerbe, Concepción, Rivera‐Torres, Pilar, Suárez‐Perales, Inés·2019·Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Abstract

This study analyses the effect of communication and cooperation—as engagement mechanisms of stakeholder's integration capacity—on eco‐innovation intensity in firms. With this purpose, a mediation model is conducted, controlling by activity sector and firm's size. Results show that communication, as the first stakeholder engagement mechanism, has a positive effect on eco‐innovation strategy and that communication is a step that comes before cooperation. Results show that cooperation with stakeholders also supports eco‐innovation strategy development. It is therefore concluded that, when firms reach the greatest degree of stakeholder integration, through cooperation mechanisms, eco‐innovation strategy is greater than when there is only communication. This study provides three types of contribution to the literature: First, the effects of two types of stakeholder engagement mechanisms, communication, and cooperation, on firm's eco‐innovation strategy are separately analysed, as the interconnection between them. Second, the study proposes a novel way of measuring eco‐innovation that enables us to consider different degrees of eco‐innovative intensity based on a capital model that includes the accumulation of tangible and intangible assets derived from activities recently adopted by firms to reduce environmental impact. Third, this study provides empirical evidence to previous literature, generally case study‐based, of the effect that the stakeholder integration process has on eco‐innovation, through communication and cooperation mechanisms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/csr.1749

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1002/csr.1324 · DOI
  2. 10.1108/14720700610689586 · DOI
  3. 10.5465/amr.2007.25275520 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.2307/20159616 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1430-9134.1994.00481.x · DOI
  8. Cunico E., 2017, Eco‐innovation and technological cooperation in cassava processing companies: Structural equation modeling, Revista de Administração (São Paulo), 52, 36, 10.1016/j.rausp.2016.09.006 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00873.x · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s10551-011-1039-y · DOI
  11. 10.1002/bse.409 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/smj.701 · DOI
  13. 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.129 · DOI
  15. Fussler C., 1996, Driving eco‐innovation: A breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability, 1996
  16. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.022 · DOI
  17. 10.1108/00251741211203524 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/bse.371 · DOI
  19. 10.7208/chicago/9780226308920.001.0001 · DOI
  20. 10.2307/258963 · DOI
  21. 10.2307/2490921 · DOI
  22. Kemp R. &Pearson P.(2007).Final report MEI project about measuring eco‐innovation. UM Merit Maastricht 10.
  23. Klemmer P., 1999, Environmental innovation: Incentives and barriers
  24. 10.1002/csr.1460 · DOI
  25. Leyva‐de la Hiz D. I., 2018, Do firms' slack resources influence the relationship between focused environmental innovations and financial performance? More is not always better, Journal of Business Ethics, 1
  26. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.01.002 · DOI
  27. MacKinnon D. P., 2008, Introduction to statistical mediation analysis
  28. 10.1086/226550 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1002/csr.1408 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1002/smj.711 · DOI
  32. Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development(2017).Enhancing the Contributions of SMEs in a Global and Digitalised Economy 2017. pp.7–8.
  33. 10.1504/IJETM.2010.034303 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.031 · DOI
  35. Pakes A., 1984, RD, patents, and productivity, 73
  36. 10.1002/bse.593 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s10551-009-0231-9 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00538.x · DOI
  40. 10.15244/pjoes/61533 · DOI
  41. 10.1108/SRJ-12-2015-0189 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.037 · DOI
  43. 10.1002/cjas.35 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/smj.439 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199808)19:8<729::AID-SMJ967>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00099-X · DOI
  47. Valero‐Gil J. Scarpellini S. Garcés‐Ayerbe C. &Rivera‐Torres P.(2017).Medioambiente e innovación en la empresa española: reduciendo distancias entre los académicos y la empresa.Universia Business Review:54.
  48. 10.1002/csr.1666 · DOI
  49. 10.1108/14601061211272358 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Garcés‐Ayerbe, C., Rivera‐Torres, P., & Suárez‐Perales, I.
Affiliations
  • Department of Management University of Zaragoza Zaragoza Spain
  • Department of Marketing University of Zaragoza Zaragoza Spain
Venue
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-10
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
1321-1332
ISSN
  • 1535-3958
  • 1535-3966
Cited by
56
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • European Social Fund
  • European Investment Bank
  • Division of Grants and Agreements
  • Cain Foundation
  • Universidad de Zaragoza (ECO2013‐48496‐C4‐3‐R, ECO2017‐86305‐C4‐3‐R, ECO2016‐77843, CH3/18)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review