The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stakeholder engagement mechanisms and their contribution to eco‐innovation: Differentiated effects of communication and cooperation
Abstract
This study analyses the effect of communication and cooperation—as engagement mechanisms of stakeholder's integration capacity—on eco‐innovation intensity in firms. With this purpose, a mediation model is conducted, controlling by activity sector and firm's size. Results show that communication, as the first stakeholder engagement mechanism, has a positive effect on eco‐innovation strategy and that communication is a step that comes before cooperation. Results show that cooperation with stakeholders also supports eco‐innovation strategy development. It is therefore concluded that, when firms reach the greatest degree of stakeholder integration, through cooperation mechanisms, eco‐innovation strategy is greater than when there is only communication. This study provides three types of contribution to the literature: First, the effects of two types of stakeholder engagement mechanisms, communication, and cooperation, on firm's eco‐innovation strategy are separately analysed, as the interconnection between them. Second, the study proposes a novel way of measuring eco‐innovation that enables us to consider different degrees of eco‐innovative intensity based on a capital model that includes the accumulation of tangible and intangible assets derived from activities recently adopted by firms to reduce environmental impact. Third, this study provides empirical evidence to previous literature, generally case study‐based, of the effect that the stakeholder integration process has on eco‐innovation, through communication and cooperation mechanisms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As a type of environmental innovation, CE is characterised by 'long-term orientation and a high level of uncertainty compared with other innovations, ' as well as by a high degree of complexity due to the need of 'detailed knowledge and adaptation to the socio-cultural setting ' (Connelly et al., 2010; Garc ´ es-Ayerbe et al., 2019, p. 1323).”
From Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies (2024) · cites this paper as Garcés-Ayerbe et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics
Rennings, K. (2000) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00112-3 · Cited by 3,226
Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training
Sarkis, J., Gonzalez‐Torre, P., & Adenso‐Diaz, B. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001 · Cited by 1,518
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- 10.1002/csr.1324 · DOI
- 10.1108/14720700610689586 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2007.25275520 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/20159616 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1430-9134.1994.00481.x · DOI
- Cunico E., 2017, Eco‐innovation and technological cooperation in cassava processing companies: Structural equation modeling, Revista de Administração (São Paulo), 52, 36, 10.1016/j.rausp.2016.09.006 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00873.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-011-1039-y · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.409 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.701 · DOI
- 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.129 · DOI
- Fussler C., 1996, Driving eco‐innovation: A breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability, 1996
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.022 · DOI
- 10.1108/00251741211203524 · DOI
- 10.1002/bse.371 · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226308920.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.2307/258963 · DOI
- 10.2307/2490921 · DOI
- Kemp R. &Pearson P.(2007).Final report MEI project about measuring eco‐innovation. UM Merit Maastricht 10.
- Klemmer P., 1999, Environmental innovation: Incentives and barriers
- 10.1002/csr.1460 · DOI
- Leyva‐de la Hiz D. I., 2018, Do firms' slack resources influence the relationship between focused environmental innovations and financial performance? More is not always better, Journal of Business Ethics, 1
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.01.002 · DOI
- MacKinnon D. P., 2008, Introduction to statistical mediation analysis
- 10.1086/226550 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/csr.1408 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smj.711 · DOI
- Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development(2017).Enhancing the Contributions of SMEs in a Global and Digitalised Economy 2017. pp.7–8.
- 10.1504/IJETM.2010.034303 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.031 · DOI
- Pakes A., 1984, RD, patents, and productivity, 73
- 10.1002/bse.593 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-009-0231-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00538.x · DOI
- 10.15244/pjoes/61533 · DOI
- 10.1108/SRJ-12-2015-0189 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.037 · DOI
- 10.1002/cjas.35 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.439 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199808)19:8<729::AID-SMJ967>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00099-X · DOI
- Valero‐Gil J. Scarpellini S. Garcés‐Ayerbe C. &Rivera‐Torres P.(2017).Medioambiente e innovación en la empresa española: reduciendo distancias entre los académicos y la empresa.Universia Business Review:54.
- 10.1002/csr.1666 · DOI
- 10.1108/14601061211272358 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies
Minoja, M., & Romano, G. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143584 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Garcés‐Ayerbe, C., Rivera‐Torres, P., & Suárez‐Perales, I.
- Affiliations
- Department of Management University of Zaragoza Zaragoza Spain
- Department of Marketing University of Zaragoza Zaragoza Spain
- Venue
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-04-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1321-1332
- ISSN
- 1535-3958
- 1535-3966
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- European Social Fund
- European Investment Bank
- Division of Grants and Agreements
- Cain Foundation
- Universidad de Zaragoza (ECO2013‐48496‐C4‐3‐R, ECO2017‐86305‐C4‐3‐R, ECO2016‐77843, CH3/18)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review