Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advances in Post‐Combustion CO2 Capture by Physical Adsorption: From Materials Innovation to Separation Practice

Liu, Ru‐Shuai, Shi, Xiao‐Dong, Wang, Cheng‐Tong, Gao, Yu‐Zhou, Xu, Shuang, Hao, Guang‐Ping, Chen, Shaoyun, Lu, An‐Hui·2021·ChemSusChem

Abstract

The atmospheric CO 2 concentration continues a rapid increase to its current record high value of 416 ppm for the time being. It calls for advanced CO 2 capture technologies. One of the attractive technologies is physical adsorption‐based separation, which shows easy regeneration and high cycle stability, and thus reduced energy penalties and cost. The extensive research on this topic is evidenced by the growing body of scientific and technical literature. The progress spans from the innovation of novel porous adsorbents to practical separation practices. Major CO 2 capture materials include the most widely used industrially relevant porous carbons, zeolites, activated alumina, mesoporous silica, and the newly emerging metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) and covalent‐organic framework (COFs). The key intrinsic properties such as pore structure, surface chemistry, preferable adsorption sites, and other structural features that would affect CO 2 capture capacity, selectivity, and recyclability are first discussed. The industrial relevant variables such as particle size of adsorbents, the mechanical strength, adsorption heat management, and other technological advances are equally important, even more crucial when scaling up from bench and pilot‐scale to demonstration and commercial scale. Therefore, we aim to bring a full picture of the adsorption‐based CO 2 separation technologies, from adsorbent design, intrinsic property evaluation to performance assessment not only under ideal equilibrium conditions but also in realistic pressure swing adsorption processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cssc.202002677

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Liu, R., Shi, X., Wang, C., Gao, Y., Xu, S., Hao, G., Chen, S., & Lu, A.
Venue
ChemSusChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-02-02
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
1428-1471
ISSN
  • 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1864-564X
OpenAlex
W3118551086
Cited by
194
References
26
FWCI
11.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in Post‐Combustion CO2 Capture by Physical Adsorption: From Materials Innovation to Separation Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cssc.202002677
The paper
Liu, R., Shi, X., Wang, C., Gao, Y., Xu, S., Hao, G., Chen, S., & Lu, A. (2021). Advances in Post‐Combustion CO2 Capture by Physical Adsorption: From Materials Innovation to Separation Practice. ChemSusChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202002677

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.