The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in Post‐Combustion CO2 Capture by Physical Adsorption: From Materials Innovation to Separation Practice
Abstract
The atmospheric CO 2 concentration continues a rapid increase to its current record high value of 416 ppm for the time being. It calls for advanced CO 2 capture technologies. One of the attractive technologies is physical adsorption‐based separation, which shows easy regeneration and high cycle stability, and thus reduced energy penalties and cost. The extensive research on this topic is evidenced by the growing body of scientific and technical literature. The progress spans from the innovation of novel porous adsorbents to practical separation practices. Major CO 2 capture materials include the most widely used industrially relevant porous carbons, zeolites, activated alumina, mesoporous silica, and the newly emerging metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) and covalent‐organic framework (COFs). The key intrinsic properties such as pore structure, surface chemistry, preferable adsorption sites, and other structural features that would affect CO 2 capture capacity, selectivity, and recyclability are first discussed. The industrial relevant variables such as particle size of adsorbents, the mechanical strength, adsorption heat management, and other technological advances are equally important, even more crucial when scaling up from bench and pilot‐scale to demonstration and commercial scale. Therefore, we aim to bring a full picture of the adsorption‐based CO 2 separation technologies, from adsorbent design, intrinsic property evaluation to performance assessment not only under ideal equilibrium conditions but also in realistic pressure swing adsorption processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems
Foo, K. Y., & Hameed, B. H. (2010) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013 · Cited by 8,479
The production of carbon materials by hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose
Sevilla, M., & Fuertes, A. B. (2009) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2009.04.026 · Cited by 2,021
Engineering carbon materials from the hydrothermal carbonization process of biomass
Hu, B., Wang, K., Wu, L., Yu, S., Antonietti, M., & Titirici, M. (2010) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200902812 · Cited by 1,765
Kambo, H. S., & Dutta, A. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.050 · Cited by 1,746
CO2 capture by solid adsorbents and their applications: current status and new trends
Wang, Q., Luo, J., Zhong, Z., & Borgna, A. (2011) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c0ee00064g · Cited by 1,611
Sustainable porous carbons with a superior performance for CO2 capture
Sevilla, M., & Fuertes, A. B. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00784f · Cited by 1,088
A review on solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture
Lee, S.-Y., & Park, S.-J. (2015) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.001 · Cited by 707
Insights into Biochar and Hydrochar Production and Applications: A Review
Zhang, Z., Zhu, Z., Shen, B., & Liu, L. (2019) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.035 · Cited by 687
Sorbents for the Direct Capture of CO 2 from Ambient Air
Shi, X., Xiao, H., Azarabadi, H., Song, J., Wu, X., Chen, X., & Lackner, K. S. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201906756 · Cited by 679
Effect of pore size on carbon dioxide sorption by carbide derived carbon
Presser, V., McDonough, J., Yeon, S.-H., & Gogotsi, Y. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c1ee01176f · Cited by 668
Biochar-based adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture: a critical review
Dissanayake, P. D., You, S., Igalavithana, A. D., Xia, Y., Bhatnagar, A., Gupta, S., Kua, H. W., Kim, S., Kwon, J.-H., Tsang, D. C. W., et al. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109582 · Cited by 489
Wang, R., Wang, P., Yan, X., Lang, J., Peng, C., & Xue, Q. (2012) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am302077c · Cited by 475
Discriminative Separation of Gases by a “Molecular Trapdoor” Mechanism in Chabazite Zeolites
Shang, J., Li, G., Singh, R., Gu, Q., Nairn, K. M., Bastow, T. J., Medhekar, N., Doherty, C. M., Hill, A. J., Liu, J. Z., et al. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja309274y · Cited by 436
Enhanced CO2 Capture Capacity of Nitrogen-Doped Biomass-Derived Porous Carbons
Chen, J., Yang, J., Hu, G., Hu, X., Li, Z., Shen, S., Radosz, M., & Fan, M. (2016) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01425 · Cited by 419
Trends in Solid Adsorbent Materials Development for CO 2 Capture
Pardakhti, M., Jafari, T., Tobin, Z., Dutta, B., Moharreri, E., Shemshaki, N. S., Suib, S., & Srivastava, R. (2019) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.9b08487 · Cited by 357
High-performance CO2 sorbents from algae
Sevilla, M., Falco, C., Titirici, M.-M., & Fuertes, A. B. (2012) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c2ra22552b · Cited by 269
Sangchoom, W., & Mokaya, R. (2015) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00351 · Cited by 193
Balahmar, N., Mitchell, A. C., & Mokaya, R. (2015) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201500867 · Cited by 177
Palomino, M., Corma, A., Jordá, J. L., Rey, F., & Valencia, S. (2012) · Chem. Commun. · doi:10.1039/c1cc16320e · Cited by 161
Triggered Gate Opening and Breathing Effects during Selective CO 2 Adsorption by Merlinoite Zeolite
Georgieva, V. M., Bruce, E. L., Verbraeken, M. C., Scott, A. R., Casteel, W. J., Brandani, S., & Wright, P. A. (2019) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b05539 · Cited by 147
Lozinska, M. M., Mowat, J. P. S., Wright, P. A., Thompson, S. P., Jorda, J. L., Palomino, M., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2014) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm404028f · Cited by 135
Activated carbon from rubber wood sawdust by carbon dioxide activation
Mazlan, M. A. F., Uemura, Y., Yusup, S., Elhassan, F., Uddin, A., Hiwada, A., & Demiya, M. (2016) · Procedia Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.549 · Cited by 97
Wahono, S. K., Stalin, J., Addai-Mensah, J., Skinner, W., Vinu, A., & Vasilev, K. (2020) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109871 · Cited by 93
Silicoaluminophosphates as CO2 sorbents
Cheung, O., Liu, Q., Bacsik, Z., & Hedin, N. (2012) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.02.003 · Cited by 80
CO 2 Adsorption in the RHO Family of Embedded Isoreticular Zeolites
Min, J. G., Kemp, K. C., Lee, H., & Hong, S. B. (2018) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09996 · Cited by 53
Zafanelli, L. F. A. S., Henrique, A., Karimi, M., Rodrigues, A. E., & Silva, J. A. C. (2020) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01911 · Cited by 33
Cited by
Carbon dioxide capture with zeotype materials
Fu, D., & Davis, M. E. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00508e · Cited by 284
Kamran, U., Rhee, K. Y., Lee, S.-Y., & Park, S.-J. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133367 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, R., Shi, X., Wang, C., Gao, Y., Xu, S., Hao, G., Chen, S., & Lu, A.
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-02-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1428-1471
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W3118551086
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 11.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
