Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 249

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Distinguishing modes of cell death using the ImageStream® multispectral imaging flow cytometer

Open access
George, Thaddeus C., Basiji, David A., Hall, Brian E., Lynch, David H., Ortyn, William E., Perry, David J., Seo, Michael J., Zimmerman, Cathleen A., Morrissey, Philip J.·2004·Cytometry Part A

Abstract

Background: Here we demonstrate the ability of the ImageStream® 100 Multispectral Imaging Cytometer to discriminate between live, necrotic, and early and late apoptotic cells, using unique combinations of photometric and morphometric features. Methods: Live, necrotic, and early and late apoptotic cells were prepared and analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy, conventional flow cytometry, and imaging flow cytometry, both as single populations and as a heterogeneous mixture of cells. Results: Live (annexin V−, 7‐AAD−) and early apoptotic (annexin V+, 7‐AAD−) cells were readily identifiable using either conventional or ImageStream based flow cytometric methods. However, inspection of multispectral images of cells demonstrated that the annexin V+, 7‐AAD+ population contained both necrotic and late‐stage apoptotic cells. Although these cells could not be distinguished using conventional flow cytometric techniques, they were separable using unique combinations of photometric and morphometric measures available using ImageStream technologies. Conclusions: Using multispectral imagery, morphologically distinct cell populations can be distinguished using features not available with conventional flow cytometers. In particular, the ability to couple morphometric with photometric measures makes it possible to distinguish live cells from cells in the early phases of apoptosis, as well as late apoptotic cells from necrotic cells. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cyto.a.20048

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 249

Metadata

Authors
George, T. C., Basiji, D. A., Hall, B. E., Lynch, D. H., Ortyn, W. E., Perry, D. J., Seo, M. J., Zimmerman, C. A., & Morrissey, P. J.
Venue
Cytometry Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-05-17
Volume
59A
Issue
2
Pages
237-245
ISSN
  • 1552-4922 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4930
OpenAlex
W1985221982
Cited by
249
References
2
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinguishing modes of cell death using the ImageStream® multispectral imaging flow cytometer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cyto.a.20048
The paper
George, T. C., Basiji, D. A., Hall, B. E., Lynch, D. H., Ortyn, W. E., Perry, D. J., Seo, M. J., Zimmerman, C. A., & Morrissey, P. J. (2004). Distinguishing modes of cell death using the ImageStream® multispectral imaging flow cytometer. Cytometry Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20048

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.