Cited by 35Connective tissue disorders researchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The relationship between frequency and intensity of fears and a collagen condition

Open access
Bulbena, A., Gago, J., Sperry, L., Bergé, D.·2006·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

Encouraged by the positive relationship between joint laxity and panic anxiety, our objective in this study was to compare widespread cultural fears in subjects with and without joint hypermobility syndrome and to assess whether this relationship is sustained for common fears as well. A sample consisting of 1,305 subjects from a rural town were assessed for joint hypermobility syndrome using Beighton's criteria. We assessed fear intensity and frequency using a modified version of the Fear Survey Schedule (FSS-III). Intense fears, defined with a score of 3-4, were compared between hypermobile and nonhypermobile subjects. The analysis was carried out separately for men and women. Nonparametric analysis was applied throughout. Joint hypermobility syndrome was found in 19.9% (141) of women and 6.9% (41) of men. Concerning the fear survey, when we compared the groups with and without joint hypermobility, the mean total scores for both genders were significantly higher for the hypermobile group. When we analyzed each item individually, 43 out of the 44 most severe fears in women and 36 out of the 39 in men, scores were significantly higher in the hypermobile group. We found significant differences between subjects with and without joint hypermobility when assessing specific fears, reinforcing the hypothesis that intensity of fears is greater in subjects with joint hypermobility syndrome. These results show that the association of joint laxity and phobic anxiety is sustained for intense fears and might represent a susceptibility factor for these anxiety conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.20160

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adults with asymptomatic GJH have more specific anxiety (state, trait, social anxiety, and severity of fears) than controls without asymptomatic GJH.

    “Adults with asymptomatic GJH had higher anxiety scores42,43 and more specific anxiety as state, trait anxiety, social anxiety, and severity of fears than controls without asymptomatic GJH.33, 34, 35, 36”

    From Role of Anxiety in Individuals with Generalized Joint Hypermobility: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Results (page unavailable) report significantly higher fear-survey scores and more severe fears in the hypermobile group than in the nonhypermobile group. The Methods describe a nonclinical sample, but the paper does not establish that participants with joint hypermobility were asymptomatic or report separate comparisons for state, trait, or social anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Contradictory results exist on the frequency of fears in healthy adults with asymptomatic GJH compared to peers without asymptomatic GJH.

    “Contradictory results were found on the frequency of fears in healthy adults with asymptomatic GJH compared to peers without asymptomatic GJH.34,35”

    From Role of Anxiety in Individuals with Generalized Joint Hypermobility: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Results and Discussion report more frequent or prevalent fears in a community sample with joint hypermobility syndrome than in those without it. The paper does not establish that the hypermobile participants were asymptomatic, and its own findings do not establish the claimed contradiction between studies. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. M.D. thesis, Universidad Auto ´noma de Barcelona, Spain.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bulbena, A., Gago, J., Sperry, L., & Bergé, D.
Affiliations
Hospital Del Mar (ES)
Corresponding author
Bulbena, A.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2006
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
412-417
ISSN
  • 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6394
OpenAlex
W2035823708
Cited by
35
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
joint hypermobility syndrome, connective tissue diseases, fear intensity, phobic anxiety, joint laxity, Beighton criteria, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Collagen Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Fear, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Rural Population, Spain, Syndrome, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review