Cited by 41Mental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health and Psychiatry

THE R-DOC INITIATIVE: SCIENCE AND PRACTICE: Special Article: The R-DOC Initiative

Open access
Craske, Michelle G.·2012·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

A research focus upon dimensions of observable behaviors and neurobiological indices, as outlined in the R-DoC initiative, is likely to enhance our understanding of psychopathology in a number of ways that are outlined in this article. Specific examples include a greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying comorbidity and complexity of symptom manifestation, individual differences in symptom expression, and developmental changes in symptom expression. Furthermore, the R-DoC approach may have treatment implications, including treatment efficacy, and identification of treatment moderators and treatment mediators.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.21930

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Focusing on inflammation's role in more homogeneous core features of depression is likely to improve understanding and treatment of major depressive disorder.

    “Thus, it is likely that a better understanding of Major Depressive Disorder and its effective treatment will emerge by focusing on the role of inflammation in the onset and maintenance of more homogenous core features that are disrupted among depressed patients (Craske, 2012; Gottesman and Gould, 2003; Hasler et al., 2004).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sumner JA, Griffith JW, Mineka S, Zinbarg R, Craske MG. Over- general autobiographical memory as a predictor of the course of depression in adolescents. Cogn Emot 2011;25:183-192.
  2. Craske MG, Wolitzky-Taylor KB, Mineka S, Zinbarg R, Waters A, Vrshek-Shallhorn S, Epstein A, Naliboff B, Ornitz E. Elevated responding to safety cues as a specific risk factor for anxiety versus depressive disorders: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Journal Abnorm Psychol. October 10, 2011 [epublished ahead of print].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craske, M. G.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Craske, Michelle G.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2012-04
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
253-256
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1784306623
Cited by
41
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
Research Domain Criteria, psychopathology, observable behavior, comorbidities, symptom complexity, treatment moderators, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Psychopathology, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review