Cited by 96Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsMind wandering and attention

The Effects of Worry in Daily Life: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study Supporting the Tenets of the Contrast Avoidance Model

Open access
Newman, Michelle G., Jacobson, Nicholas C., Zainal, Nur Hani, Shin, Ki Eun, Szkodny, Lauren E., Sliwinski, Martin J.·2019·Clinical Psychological Science

Abstract

The contrast avoidance model (CAM) suggests that worry increases and sustains negative emotion to prevent a negative emotional contrast (sharp upward shift in negative emotion) and increase the probability of a positive contrast (shift toward positive emotion). In Study 1, we experimentally validated momentary assessment items ( N = 25). In Study 2, participants with generalized anxiety disorder ( N = 31) and controls ( N = 37) were prompted once per hour regarding their worry, thought valence, and arousal 10 times a day for 8 days. Higher worry duration, negative thought valence, and uncontrollable train of thoughts predicted feeling more keyed up concurrently and sustained anxious activation 1 hr later. More worry, feeling keyed up, and uncontrollable train of thoughts predicted lower likelihood of a negative emotional contrast in thought valence and higher likelihood of a positive emotional contrast in thought valence 1 hr later. Findings support the prospective ecological validity of CAM. Our findings suggest that naturalistic worry reduces the likelihood of a sharp increase in negative affect and does so by increasing and sustaining anxious activation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2167702619827019

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  2. LaFreniere LS, & Newman MG (2017). A randomized controlled trial of a brief ecological momentary intervention for generalized anxiety disorder. Paper presented at the Anxiety and Depression Association of America Conference, San Francisco, CA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newman, M. G., Jacobson, N. C., Zainal, N. H., Shin, K. E., Szkodny, L. E., & Sliwinski, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Newman, Michelle G.
Venue
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2019-03
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
794-810
ISSN
  • 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-7034
OpenAlex
W2918785654
Cited by
96
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
14.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • pennsylvania state university
  • national science foundation (1110970)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
worry, generalized anxiety disorder, negative affect, arousal, momentary assessment, ecological validity, daily life emotions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review