Cited by 40Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

RECENT AND NEEDED ADVANCES IN THE UNDERSTANDING, PREDICTION, AND PREVENTION OF SUICIDAL BEHAVIOR: Editorial

Nock, Matthew K.·2016·Depression and Anxiety

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22528

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nock, M. K.
Corresponding author
Nock, Matthew K.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2016-06
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
460-463
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2411067751
Cited by
40
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH107479)
  • DoD Military Suicide Research Consortium (W81XWH-10-2-0181)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
suicidal behavior, suicide risk prediction, suicide prevention, depression, risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review