Cited by 101Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Research TopicsMental Health via Writing

The dynamics of social support among suicide attempters: a smartphone-based daily diary study

Coppersmith, Daniel D.L., Kleiman, Evan M., Glenn, Catherine R., Millner, Alexander J., Nock, Matthew K.·2019·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Decades of research suggest that social support is an important factor in predicting suicide risk and resilience. However, no studies have examined dynamic fluctuations in day-by-day levels of perceived social support. We examined such fluctuations over 28 days among a sample of 53 adults who attempted suicide in the past year (992 total observations). Variability in social support was analyzed with between-person intraclass correlations and root mean square of successive differences. Multi-level models were conducted to determine the association between social support and suicidal ideation. Results revealed that social support varies considerably from day to day with 45% of social support ratings differing by at least one standard deviation from the prior assessment. Social support is inversely associated with same-day and next-day suicidal ideation, but not with next-day suicidal ideation after adjusting for same-day suicidal ideation (i.e., not with daily changes in suicidal ideation). These results suggest that social support is a time-varying protective factor for suicidal ideation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2018.11.016

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most reports failed to establish independent temporal predictors of suicidal ideation severity: of twelve articles fitting temporal prediction models, four failed to establish significant predictors after accounting for ideation at the previous time point, and five did not control for prior ideation.

    “Most reports failed to establish independent temporal predictors of suicidal ideation severity: of twelve articles fitting temporal prediction models (47, 51, 52, 55–57, 60, 73, 74, 76, 77), four failed to establish significant predictors after accounting for ideation at the previous time point (47, 52, 55), and five did not control for prior ideation (51, 60, 73, 74, 76).”
  • Perceived social support decreased the probability of suicidal ideation.

    “whereas perceived social support decreased its probability (52).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coppersmith, D. D. L., Kleiman, E. M., Glenn, C. R., Millner, A. J., & Nock, M. K.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Coppersmith, Daniel D.L.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
120
Pages
103348
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2905428526
Cited by
101
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5
FWCI
8.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Chet and Will Griswold Suicide Prevention Fund
  • Pershing Square Venture Fund for Research on the Foundations of Human Behavior
  • John T. and Catherine D. MacArthur Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
social support, suicide attempters, suicidal ideation, daily fluctuations, suicide risk, resilience
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Diaries as Topic, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Social Support, Suicide, Attempted, Risk Assessment, Multilevel Analysis, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review