Cited by 55Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Suicidal ideation among anxious youth: a preliminary investigation of the role of neural processing of social rejection in interaction with real world negative social experiences

Open access
Oppenheimer, Caroline W., Silk, Jennifer S., Lee, Kyung Hwa, Dahl, Ronald E., Forbes, Erika, Ryan, Neal, Ladouceur, Cecile D.·2020·Child Psychiatry & Human Development

Abstract

Suicidal ideation increases in adolescence, especially for anxious youth, and is a frequent precursor to suicide. This study examined whether neural processing of social rejection interacted with negative social experiences to predict suicidal ideation. Thus, to our knowledge this is the first study to examine how brain function may interact with the environment to contribute to suicidal ideation in youth, consistent with a developmental psychopathology perspective. Thirty-six anxious youth (ages 11 to 16) completed diagnostic interviews and questionnaires, an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol, and a functional magnetic resonance imaging paradigm. Results showed that youth experienced greater severity of suicidal ideation when they exhibited heightened activation to social rejection in the right anterior insula and also experienced high levels of peer victimization or EMA-measured daily negative social experiences. Findings provide preliminary evidence that alterations in neural processing of social rejection interacts with exposure to negative social experiences to contribute to suicidal ideation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10578-019-00920-6

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Greater suicidal ideation in adolescents is associated with heightened insula activation to social rejection during an ecological momentary assessment protocol.

    “Greater SI in adolescents has also been found to be associated with heightened insula activation to social rejection during an EMA protocol (79).”

    From New methods for assessing rapid changes in suicide risk (2021) · cites this paper as [79]

  • Peer victimization moderates the relationship between right anterior insula activation (rejection versus acceptance) and suicide ideation.

    “Experience of peer victimization moderates the relationship between right anterior insula activation (rejection versus acceptance) and suicide ideation (80).”
  • Collectively, neuroimaging studies demonstrate consistent evidence of engagement in subgenual ACC, vlPFC, posterior midline regions, and ventral striatum during social exclusion; paradigms looking at anticipation/receipt of social evaluative feedback additionally elicit responses in amygdala and medial orbitofrontal cortex.

    “Collectively, these studies demonstrate consistent evidence of engagement in subgenual ACC (sgACC), vlPFC, posterior midline regions, and ventral striatum (for a meta-analysis, see (124)); the paradigms that look at anticipation/receipt of social evaluative feedback additionally elicit responses in amygdala and medial orbitofrontal cortex.(39,122,123,125)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [51]Brett M, Anton J-L, Valabregue R, Poline J-B, editors. Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. 8th international conference on functional mapping of the human brain; 2002: Sendai.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oppenheimer, C. W., Silk, J. S., Lee, K. H., Dahl, R. E., Forbes, E., Ryan, N., & Ladouceur, C. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Oppenheimer, Caroline W.
Venue
Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Published
2019-08-16
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
163-173
ISSN
  • 0009-398X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3327
OpenAlex
W2967531853
Cited by
55
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9
FWCI
9.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (MH091327)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH109850)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
suicidal ideation, social rejection, anxiety, adolescents, anterior insula, neural processing, peer victimization, developmental psychopathology, ecological momentary assessment, functional MRI
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adolescent, Anxiety, Brain, Child, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Psychological Distance, Crime Victims, Bullying, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review