Cited by 119Mental Health Research TopicsDigital Mental Health InterventionsEmotion and Mood Recognition

The accuracy of passive phone sensors in predicting daily mood

Open access
Pratap, Abhishek, Atkins, David C., Renn, Brenna N., Tanana, Michael J., Mooney, Sean D., Anguera, Joaquin A., Areán, Patricia A.·2019·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smartphones provide a low-cost and efficient means to collect population level data. Several small studies have shown promise in predicting mood variability from smartphone-based sensor and usage data, but have not been generalized to nationally recruited samples. This study used passive smartphone data, demographic characteristics, and baseline depressive symptoms to predict prospective daily mood. METHOD: Daily phone usage data were collected passively from 271 Android phone users participating in a fully remote randomized controlled trial of depression treatment (BRIGHTEN). Participants completed daily Patient Health Questionnaire-2. A machine learning approach was used to predict daily mood for the entire sample and individual participants. RESULTS: ∼ 0). Focusing on individuals, 13.9% of participants showed significant association (FDR < 0.10) between a passive feature and daily mood. Personalized models combining features provided better prediction performance (median area under the curve [AUC] > 0.50) for 80.6% of participants and very strong prediction in a subset (median AUC > 0.80) for 11.8% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Passive smartphone data with current features may not be suited for predicting daily mood at a population level because of the high degree of intra- and interindividual variation in phone usage patterns and daily mood ratings. Personalized models show encouraging early signs for predicting an individual's mood state changes, with GPS-derived mobility being the top most important feature in the present sample.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22822

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Passive sensor data can be used to predict various symptoms of mental disorders or mental health problems.

    “This type of research has established that passive sensor data can be used to predict various symptoms of mental disorders or mental health problems (23, 33–38), as well as their future development [e.g., (39)].”
  • Missing values leading to subset inclusion is a common finding in real-world data studies, particularly with mobile sensor features.

    “This is a common finding in studies based on real-world data, particularly if mobile sensor features are included [see, e.g., (34, 35)].”
  • Preliminary studies suggest that aggregates of smartphone-based passive features are useful in predicting daily mood and presence of depressive symptoms.

    “Preliminary studies suggest that aggregates of smartphone-based passive features are useful in predicting daily mood (23) and presence of depressive symptoms (24).”
  • Prior investigations have primarily focused on detecting presence or absence of depression rather than on assessing its severity, and they have shown overall low accuracy.

    “This has resulted in possible reliability problems, since these investigations have primarily focused on detecting presence or absence of depression rather than on assessing its severity, and they have shown overall low accuracy (14–18, 23–27).”
  • Studies conducted with patients with depression have mostly relied on self-report questionnaires to assign diagnoses and/or measure variation in symptoms and train the models.

    “Those studies conducted with patients with depression have mostly relied on self-report questionnaires to assign diagnoses and/or measure variation in symptoms and train the models.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pratap, A., Atkins, D. C., Renn, B. N., Tanana, M. J., Mooney, S. D., Anguera, J. A., & Areán, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Sage Bionetworks (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Areán, Patricia A.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-21
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
72-81
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888288032
Cited by
119
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
14.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH100466, T32MH073553)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
smartphone usage data, personalized prediction models, mood variability, depression, depressive symptoms, machine learning
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Adult, Affect, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review