Cited by 116Emotion and Mood RecognitionContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsMental Health Research Topics

Objective assessment of depressive symptoms with machine learning and wearable sensors data

Ghandeharioun, Asma, Fedor, Szymon, Sangermano, Lisa, Ionescu, Dawn, Alpert, Jonathan, Dale, Chelsea, Sontag, David, Picard, Rosalind·2017·2017 Seventh International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII)

Abstract

Depression is the major cause of years lived in disability world-wide; however, its diagnosis and tracking methods still rely mainly on assessing self-reported depressive symptoms, methods that originated more than fifty years ago. These methods, which usually involve filling out surveys or engaging in face-to-face interviews, provide limited accuracy and reliability and are costly to track and scale. In this paper, we develop and test the efficacy of machine learning techniques applied to objective data captured passively and continuously from E4 wearable wristbands and from sensors in an Android phone for predicting the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Input data include electrodermal activity (EDA), sleep behavior, motion, phone-based communication, location changes, and phone usage patterns. We introduce our feature generation and transformation process, imputing missing clinical scores from self-reported measures, and predicting depression severity from continuous sensor measurements. While HDRS ranges between 0 and 52, we were able to impute it with 2.8 RMSE and predict it with 4.5 RMSE which are low relative errors. Analyzing the features and their relation to depressive symptoms, we found that poor mental health was accompanied by more irregular sleep, less motion, fewer incoming messages, less variability in location patterns, and higher asymmetry of EDA between the right and the left wrists.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/acii.2017.8273620

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other works have introduced methods for monitoring stroke in infants using wearable accelerometers and methods for assessing depressive symptoms utilizing wrist-worn sensors.

    “Other works have introduced methods for monitoring stroke in infants using wearable accelerometers [41] and methods for assessing depressive symptoms utilizing wrist-worn sensors [42].”
  • The potential problem of overfitting was addressed by reducing the dimensionality of features using linear and non-linear transformations.

    “Similar to our previous work (37), we addressed the potential problem of overfitting by reducing the dimensionality of features using linear and non-linear transformations (see more details in A.2. in Supplementary Material).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghandeharioun, A., Fedor, S., Sangermano, L., Ionescu, D., Alpert, J., Dale, C., Sontag, D., & Picard, R.
Affiliations
  • MIT Media Lab (US)
  • MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
Venue
2017 Seventh International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-10
Pages
325-332
ISSN
2156-8103 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2787556368
Cited by
116
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9
FWCI
8.48
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
depression, depressive symptoms, wearable sensors, electrodermal activity, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, depression severity prediction, sleep behavior, motion activity, smartphone usage patterns, location patterns, missing data imputation, self-report measures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review