Cited by 154Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingDigital Mental Health Interventions

The use of smartphones for health research

Dorsey, E. Ray, “Yvonne” Chan, Yu-Feng, McConnell, Michael V., Shaw, Stanley Y., Trister, Andrew D., Friend, Stephen H.·2017·Academic Medicine

Abstract

Because of their growing popularity and functionality, smartphones are increasingly valuable potential tools for health and medical research. Using ResearchKit, Apple's open-source platform to build applications ("apps") for smartphone research, collaborators have developed apps for researching asthma, breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and Parkinson disease. These research apps enhance widespread participation by removing geographical barriers to participation, provide novel ways to motivate healthy behaviors, facilitate high-frequency assessments, and enable more objective data collection. Although the studies have great potential, they also have notable limitations. These include selection bias, identity uncertainty, design limitations, retention, and privacy. As smartphone technology becomes increasingly available, researchers must recognize these factors to ensure that medical research is conducted appropriately. Despite these limitations, the future of smartphones in health research is bright. Their convenience grants unprecedented geographic freedom to researchers and participants alike and transforms the way clinical research can be conducted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0000000000001205

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dorsey, E. R., “Yvonne” Chan, Y.-F., McConnell, M. V., Shaw, S. Y., Trister, A. D., & Friend, S. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Y.F. Chanis assistant professor, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences and Department of Emergency Medicine, and director of digital health, Icahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Sage Bionetworks (US)
Corresponding author
Dorsey, E. Ray
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2017-02
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
157-160
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2343010276
Cited by
154
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12
FWCI
32.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P20NS092529)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
smartphones, ResearchKit, mobile health, mobile application, clinical research participation, asthma, breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, Parkinson's disease, selection bias, participant retention, privacy
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Disease, Humans, Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures, Biomedical Research, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review