Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of the effects of early handling and early deprivation on maternal care in the rat

Pryce, Christopher R., Bettschen, Daniela, Feldon, Joram·2001·Developmental Psychobiology
DOI 10.1002/dev.1018
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

It has been reported in the rat that postnatal manipulations can induce robust and persistent effects on offspring neurobiology and behavior, mediated in part via effects on maternal care. There have, however, been few studies of the effects of postnatal manipulations on maternal care. Here, we describe and compare the effects on maternal behavior on postnatal days 1–12 of two manipulations, early handling (EH, 15‐min isolation per day) and early deprivation (ED, 4‐hr isolation per day), relative to our normal postnatal husbandry procedure. Maternal behavior was measured at five time points across the dark phase of the reversed L:D cycle. EH yielded an increase in arched‐back nursing across several time points but did not affect any other behavior. ED stimulated a bout of maternal behavior such that licking and arched‐back nursing were increased at the time of dam–litter reunion, although not at any other time point. Neither EH nor ED affected weaning weight significantly. Importantly, within‐treatment variation was high relative to these between‐treatment effects. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 38: 239–251, 2001

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dev.1018

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Pryce, C. R., Bettschen, D., & Feldon, J.
Venue
Developmental Psychobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-04-17
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
239-251
ISSN
  • 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2302
DOI
10.1002/dev.1018
OpenAlex
W2012372126
Cited by
270
References
33
FWCI
21.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.