The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What's driving the binge in binge eating disorder?: A prospective examination of precursors and consequences
Abstract
Objective: Previous research, mostly using retrospective reports, indicated a relation of negative affect and dietary restraint with the occurrence of binge episodes in binge eating disorder (BED). We employed Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to better understand precursors and consequences of binge eating. Method: Thirty‐three females with BED carried a handheld computer for 7 days, and were periodically prompted to indicate their current emotions, hunger, and binge status. Results: Negative mood and hunger were significantly higher at prebinge than at nonbinge times, but negative mood was even higher at postbinge. Participants attributed binge episodes to mood more frequently than to hunger or abstinence violation. Conclusion: The finding that negative mood is actually heightened subsequent to a binge suggests the need to further investigate what is reinforcing about a binge, including possible escape from self‐awareness. Strengths of EMA technology are discussed, as well as its broad utility in BED assessment and treatment. © 2006 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 2006
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR)
American Psychiatric Association (2000) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890423349 · Cited by 11,069
Binge eating as escape from self-awareness
Heatherton, T. F., & Baumeister, R. F. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.86 · Cited by 2,259
Dialectical behavior therapy for binge eating disorder.
Telch, C. F., Agras, W. S., & Linehan, M. M. (2001) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.69.6.1061 · Cited by 780
Kenardy, J. A., Dow, M. G. T., Johnston, D. W., Newman, M. G., Thomson, A., & Taylor, C. B. (2003) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.71.6.1068 · Cited by 157
Cited by
Experience sampling research in psychopathology: opening the black box of daily life
Myin-Germeys, I., Oorschot, M., Collip, D., Lataster, J., Delespaul, P., & van Os, J. (2009) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291708004947 · Cited by 817
Haedt-Matt, A. A., & Keel, P. K. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0023660 · Cited by 799
“…(2007) .98 (.18)*** 1.21 (.19)*** Sherwood et al. (2000) .54 (.13)*** Smyth et al. (2007) .41 (.08)*** Steiger et al. (1999) .24 (.12)* Steiger et al. (2005) 1.42 (.28)*** Stein et al. (2007) .61 (.16)*** k = 17 k = 14 Weighted mean .63 (.09)*** .68 (.14)*** 95% CI .45, .82 .40, .95 Note.”
ResultInfluentialSvaldi, J., Griepenstroh, J., Tuschen-Caffier, B., & Ehring, T. (2012) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2011.11.009 · Cited by 408
Gianini, L. M., White, M. A., & Masheb, R. M. (2013) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.05.008 · Cited by 263
Validity and utility of the current definition of binge eating
Wolfe, B. E., Baker, C. W., Smith, A. T., & Kelly‐Weeder, S. (2009) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20728 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Stein, R. I., Kenardy, J., Wiseman, C. V., Dounchis, J. Z., Arnow, B. A., & Wilfley, D. E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Eating Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11-13
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 195-203
- ISSN
- 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-108X
- OpenAlex
- W2021935560
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
