Cited by 157Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

A comparison of delivery methods of cognitive-behavioral therapy for panic disorder: an international multicenter trial

Open access
Kenardy, Justin A., Dow, Michael G. T., Johnston, Derek W., Newman, Michelle G., Thomson, Aileen, Taylor, C. Barr·2003·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is the psychological treatment of choice for panic disorder (PD). However, given limited access to CBT, it must be delivered with maximal cost-effectiveness. Previous researchers have found that a brief computer-augmented CBT was as effective as extended therapist-delivered CBT. To test this finding, this study randomly allocated 186 patients with PD across 2 sites in Scotland and Australia to 12 sessions of therapist-delivered CBT (CBT12), 6 sessions of therapist-delivered (CBT6) or computer-augmented CBT (CBT6-CA), or a waitlist control. On a composite measure, at posttreatment, the outcome for CBT 12 was statistically better than the outcome for CBT6. The outcome for CBT6-CA fell between CBT12 and CBT6, but could not be statistically distinguished from either treatment. The active treatments did not differ statistically at 6-month follow-up. The study provided some support for the use of computers as an innovative adjunctive-therapy tool and merits further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.71.6.1068

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kenardy, J. A., Dow, M. G. T., Johnston, D. W., Newman, M. G., Thomson, A., & Taylor, C. B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • NHS Fife (GB)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2003
Volume
71
Issue
6
Pages
1068-1075
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2082084765
Cited by
157
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, panic disorder, computer-assisted therapy, brief psychotherapy, treatment duration, adjunctive therapy, treatment efficacy, follow-up outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Desensitization, Psychologic, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Personality Inventory, Psychotherapy, Brief, Software, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Computers, Handheld

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review