Cited by 183Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPsychiatric care and mental health services

Digital technology can revolutionize mental health services delivery: The COVID ‐19 crisis as a catalyst for change

Open access
Taylor, C. Barr, Fitzsimmons‐Craft, Ellen E., Graham, Andrea K.·2020·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

The unprecedented COVID‐19 crisis presents an imperative for mental health care systems to make digital mental health interventions a routine part of care. Already because of COVID‐19, many therapists have rapidly moved to using telehealth in place of in‐person contact. In response to this shift, Waller and colleagues compiled a series of expert recommendations to help clinicians pivot to delivering teletherapy to address eating disorders during COVID‐19. However, numerous barriers still impede widespread adoption and implementation of digital interventions. In this commentary, we aim to extend the recommendations for clinicians offered by Waller and colleagues by presenting a roadmap of the systems‐ and policy‐level requirements that are needed. We advocate for addressing barriers associated with training, licensing, safety, privacy, payment, and evaluation, as these factors have greatly limited use of these promising interventions. We also indicate that longer‐term goals should include introducing truly innovative digital mental health practices, such as stepped‐care models and simultaneously providing preventive and self‐management services in addition to clinical services, into the health care system. Now is the time to catalyze change and comprehensively address the barriers that have prevented widespread delivery of these efficacious digital services to the millions of people who would benefit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.23300

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, C. B., Fitzsimmons‐Craft, E. E., & Graham, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Palo Alto University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, C. Barr
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05-25
Volume
53
Issue
7
Pages
1155-1157
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W3026387323
Cited by
183
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 10
FWCI
28.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K01 DK116925)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K08 MH120341, R01 MH115128)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
digital mental health interventions, external beam radiotherapy, telemedicine, COVID-19 pandemic, eating disorders, barriers to adoption, stepped care, mental health policy, health care system change
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Cognition, Humans, Mental Health Services, Pneumonia, Viral, Telemedicine, Coronavirus, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review