Cognitive‐behavioral therapy for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: Feasibility, acceptability, and proof‐of‐concept for children and adolescents
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Little is known about the optimal treatment of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). The purpose of this study was to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, and proof‐of‐concept for cognitive‐behavioral therapy for ARFID (CBT‐AR) in children and adolescents. Method: Males and females (ages 10–17 years) were offered 20–30 sessions of CBT‐AR delivered in a family‐based or individual format. Results: Of 25 eligible individuals, 20 initiated treatment, including 17 completers and 3 dropouts. Using intent‐to‐treat analyses, clinicians rated 17 patients (85%) as “much improved” or “very much improved.” ARFID severity scores (on the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Interview) significantly decreased per both patient and parent report. Patients incorporated a mean of 16.7 ( SD = 12.1) new foods from pre‐ to post‐treatment. The underweight subgroup showed a significant weight gain of 11.5 ( SD = 6.0) pounds, moving from the 10th to the 20th percentile for body mass index. At post‐treatment, 70% of patients no longer met criteria for ARFID. Discussion: This is the first study of an outpatient manualized psychosocial treatment for ARFID in older adolescents. Findings provide evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and proof‐of‐concept for CBT‐AR. Randomized controlled trials are needed.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This open trial evaluated cognitive-behavioral therapy for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (CBT-AR) in children and adolescents ages 10–17, finding preliminary evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and proof-of-concept. Of 20 patients who initiated treatment, 17 completed, and 70% no longer met ARFID criteria at post-treatment.
Key findings
- Of 25 eligible individuals offered CBT-AR, 20 initiated treatment; 17 (85%) completed and 3 (15%) dropped out.
- Therapists rated 17 patients (85%) as “much improved” or “very much improved” on the CGI; 70% of patients no longer met criteria for ARFID at post-treatment.
- Patients incorporated a mean of 16.7 (SD = 12.1) new foods from pre- to post-treatment, primarily fruits, vegetables, and proteins.
- The underweight subgroup (n = 14) gained an average of 11.5 (SD = 6.0) pounds and moved from approximately the 10th to the 20th percentile for BMI; PARDI ARFID severity decreased significantly by both patient and parent report.
- Two adverse events occurred during Stage 3: one patient vomited during an interoceptive exposure, and one had mouth tingling after tasting nuts and was diagnosed with a nut allergy; both completed CBT-AR.
Methods
- Open, uncontrolled proof-of-concept trial of manualized CBT-AR delivered in 20–30 sessions over four stages, in either family-supported or individual format, to patients ages 10–17 recruited from a larger ARFID neurobiology study.
- Twenty patients were included in intent-to-treat analyses; assessments included the PARDI, CGI, Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire, Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, Food Neophobia Scale, height/weight/BMI percentile, STAIC trait subscale, and CDI-2.
- Analyses calculated uptake, completion, average sessions, credibility/satisfaction, and used paired t-tests with baseline carried forward for non-completers, plus McNemar’s tests for change in ARFID diagnosis.
Limitations
- The paper states there was no control group, so alternative explanations such as passage of time or therapist attention cannot be ruled out.
- The sample size was small, pre-treatment PARDI scores were fairly low, and the sample was recruited from a neurobiology study requiring MRI compatibility and offering monetary compensation, limiting generalizability.
- Only two of 20 participants received individual CBT-AR, limiting conclusions about that format; the paper also notes that larger randomized trials, more severely ill populations, and post-treatment follow-up are needed.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 31 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Using intent-to-treat analyses, clinicians rated 17 patients (85%) as "much improved" or "very much improved."
“Using intent-to-treat analyses, clinicians rated 17 patients (85%) as “much improved” or “very much improved.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Therapists' post-treatment CGI ratings are unbiased by therapist allegiance or knowledge of treatment.
- Findingown data
Patients incorporated a mean of 16.7 (SD = 12.1) new foods from pre- to post-treatment.
“Patients incorporated a mean of 16.7 (SD = 12.1) new foods from pre- to post-treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The number of new foods incorporated recorded by therapists is an accurate measure of patients' food incorporation.
- Findingown data
The underweight subgroup showed a significant weight gain of 11.5 (SD = 6.0) pounds, moving from the 10th to the 20th percentile for body mass index.
“The underweight subgroup showed a significant weight gain of 11.5 (SD = 6.0) pounds, moving from the 10th to the 20th percentile for body mass index.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At post-treatment, 70% of patients no longer met criteria for ARFID.
“At post-treatment, 70% of patients no longer met criteria for ARFID.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of 25 individuals offered CBT-AR, 20 chose to take it up.
“Of the 25 individuals whom we offered CBT-AR, 20 chose to take it up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Three of the 20 patients included in intent-to-treat analyses dropped out (15%).
“Of those, three (15%) dropped out and 17 (85%) completed treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among completers, patients who were not underweight completed an average of 20.6 (SD = 2.9) sessions.
“Similarly, patients who were not underweight completed an average of 20.6 (SD = 2.9) sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Trait anxiety decreased at trend level with a small effect size from pre- to post-treatment.
“Regarding co-occurring difficulties, trait anxiety decreased at trend level with a small effect size, but depression scores did not change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among completers, underweight patients completed an average of 24.4 (SD = 5.2) sessions.
“Of those who completed the treatment, underweight patients completed an average of 24.4 (SD = 5.2) sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Food neophobia decreased significantly from pre- to post-treatment (p = .004) with medium to large effect size.
“Food neophobia decreased significantly (p = .004) with a medium to large effect size.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Patients incorporated a mean of 16.7 (SD = 12.1) new foods from pre- to post-treatment, primarily from groups under-represented in their diets including fruits, vegetables, and proteins.
“Patients incorporated a mean of 16.7 (SD = 12.1) new foods from pre- to post-treatment, primarily from groups under-represented in their diets including fruits, vegetables, and proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Patient-rated PARDI fear of aversive consequences decreased at trend-level (p = .052) with medium effect size.
“Patient ratings of PARDI fear of aversive consequences decreased at trend-level (p = .052) with a medium effect size.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Across the whole sample, patient-rated PARDI ARFID overall severity decreased significantly from pre- to post-treatment (p < .001) with medium to large effect size.
“Across the whole sample, PARDI patient ratings of ARFID overall severity (p < .001), sensory sensitivity (p = .012), and lack of interest (p = .030) decreased significantly with medium to large effect sizes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
By patient report, patients were significantly less likely to meet criteria for ARFID at post-treatment (p < .001).
“Using the PARDI diagnostic algorithm, patients were significantly less likely to meet criteria for ARFID at post-treatment, by both patient (p < .001) and parent (p = .002) report.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Depression scores did not change from pre- to post-treatment.
“Regarding co-occurring difficulties, trait anxiety decreased at trend level with a small effect size, but depression scores did not change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the family-supported version, parent-rated PARDI fear of aversive consequences decreased significantly (p = .047) with medium to large effect size.
“For those in the family-supported version, parent-rated PARDI overall severity (p < .001), PARDI sensory sensitivity (p = .045), and PARDI fear of aversive consequences (p = .047) decreased significantly with medium to large effect sizes, whereas parent-rated PARDI lack of interest did not change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the family-supported version, parent-rated PARDI lack of interest did not change.
“For those in the family-supported version, parent-rated PARDI overall severity (p < .001), PARDI sensory sensitivity (p = .045), and PARDI fear of aversive consequences (p = .047) decreased significantly with medium to large effect sizes, whereas parent-rated PARDI lack of interest did not change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of five females who were underweight and not menstruating at pre-treatment, three had begun menstruating by post-treatment.
“Of the five females who were underweight and not menstruating at pre-treatment, three had begun menstruating by post-treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Patient-rated PARDI lack of interest decreased significantly from pre- to post-treatment (p = .030) with medium to large effect size.
“Across the whole sample, PARDI patient ratings of ARFID overall severity (p < .001), sensory sensitivity (p = .012), and lack of interest (p = .030) decreased significantly with medium to large effect sizes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The underweight subgroup (n = 14) gained an average of 11.5 (SD = 6.0) pounds from pre- to post-treatment (p < .001).
“The underweight subgroup (n = 14) gained an average of 11.5 (SD = 6.0) pounds from pre- to post-treatment (p < .001), moving from approximately the 10th percentile to the 20th percentile for BMI (p < .001), representing a significant increase with a large effect size.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were two adverse events, both during Stage 3.
“There were two adverse events, both during Stage 3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CBT-AR was associated with symptom improvement across multiple informants (therapists, patients, and parents).
“Third, CBT-AR was associated with symptom improvement across multiple informants (i.e., therapists, patients, and parents).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Both patients who experienced adverse events went on to complete CBT-AR.
“Both patients went on to complete CBT-AR.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All patients and parents, including those who later dropped out, endorsed high ratings of treatment credibility and expectations for improvement after session 1.
“All patients and parents, including those who later dropped out, endorsed high ratings of treatment credibility and expectations for improvement after session 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Therapists rated all 17 completers as "much improved" or "very much improved" on the CGI.
“Therapists rated all 17 completers as “much improved” or “very much improved” on the CGI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For completers, sessions were delivered over an average of 33.7 (SD = 11.2) weeks.
“For completers, sessions were delivered over an average of 33.7 (SD = 11.2) weeks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
By parent report, patients were significantly less likely to meet criteria for ARFID at post-treatment (p = .002).
“Using the PARDI diagnostic algorithm, patients were significantly less likely to meet criteria for ARFID at post-treatment, by both patient (p < .001) and parent (p = .002) report.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At post-treatment, patients and parents who completed treatment reported high ratings of treatment satisfaction.
“At post-treatment, patients and their parents who completed the treatment reported high ratings of treatment satisfaction (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Seventeen of the 20 patients included in intent-to-treat analyses completed treatment (85%).
“Of those, three (15%) dropped out and 17 (85%) completed treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the family-supported version, parent-rated PARDI overall severity decreased significantly from pre- to post-treatment (p < .001) with medium to large effect size.
“For those in the family-supported version, parent-rated PARDI overall severity (p < .001), PARDI sensory sensitivity (p = .045), and PARDI fear of aversive consequences (p = .047) decreased significantly with medium to large effect sizes, whereas parent-rated PARDI lack of interest did not change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
70% of patients no longer met criteria for ARFID at the end of treatment.
“Perhaps most notably, 70% of patients no longer met criteria for ARFID at the end of treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the family-supported version, parent-rated PARDI sensory sensitivity decreased significantly (p = .045) with medium to large effect size.
“For those in the family-supported version, parent-rated PARDI overall severity (p < .001), PARDI sensory sensitivity (p = .045), and PARDI fear of aversive consequences (p = .047) decreased significantly with medium to large effect sizes, whereas parent-rated PARDI lack of interest did not change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Patient-rated PARDI sensory sensitivity decreased significantly from pre- to post-treatment (p = .012) with medium to large effect size.
“Across the whole sample, PARDI patient ratings of ARFID overall severity (p < .001), sensory sensitivity (p = .012), and lack of interest (p = .030) decreased significantly with medium to large effect sizes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Published research on the treatment of older children and adolescents with ARFID is limited to retrospective chart reviews, case studies, and case series.
“Published research on the treatment of older children and adolescents is limited to retrospective chart reviews (e.g., Bryson et al., 2018; Makhzoumi et al., 2019), case studies (e.g., Thomas et al., 2017), and case series (e.g., Dumont et al., 2019; Rienecke et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bryson et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Makhzoumi et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Thomas et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The first cognitive-behavioral treatment manual specifically for individuals with ARFID was recently published.
“To meet this need, the first cognitive-behavioral treatment manual specifically for individuals with ARFID was recently published.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thomas & Eddy, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
There is little evidence to guide treatment of ARFID.
“Despite data suggesting that ARFID is prevalent and impairing, there is little evidence to guide treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Sharp et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sharp et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lock et al., 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A case series of 11 children and adolescents ages 10-18 years found that CBT delivered in an intensive day-hospital format resulted in significant reductions in ARFID symptoms.
“For example, a case series of 11 children and adolescents ages 10–18 years found that CBT delivered in an intensive day-hospital format resulted in significant reductions in ARFID symptoms (Dumont et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dumont et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A randomized controlled trial (n = 28) of children ages 5-12 years highlighted the feasibility of outpatient family-based treatment (FBT) in comparison to usual care.
“Similarly, a randomized controlled trial (n = 28) of children ages 5–12 years highlighted the feasibility of outpatient family-based treatment (FBT) in comparison to usual care (Lock et al., 2019a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lock et al., 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
The use of intent-to-treat analyses, which assumed no change among non-completers, provided a conservative test of the hypotheses.
“Fourth, the use of intent-to-treat analyses, which assumed no change among non-completers, provided a conservative test of our hypotheses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Non-completers did not change from pre- to post-treatment.
- Interpretationown data
The results suggest that it is possible to treat ARFID successfully with only a therapist and physician, and without a large multidisciplinary team.
“Furthermore, our results suggest that it is possible to treat ARFID successfully with only a therapist and physician, and without a large multidisciplinary team.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The findings are consistent with a recent case series reporting that another form of CBT for ARFID delivered in an intensive four-week day-hospital format was effective in reducing ARFID symptoms in adolescents.
“Our findings are consistent with a recent case series reporting that another form of CBT for ARFID (delivered in an intensive four-week day-hospital format) was effective in reducing ARFID symptoms in adolescents (Dumont et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dumont et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In one study, low-weight girls with ARFID showed significantly lower levels of the orexigenic appetite-stimulating hormone ghrelin than girls with anorexia nervosa, both while fasting and in response to a test meal.
“In one study, low-weight girls with ARFID showed significantly lower levels of the orexigenic appetite-stimulating hormone ghrelin than girls with anorexia nervosa, both while fasting and in response to a test meal (Becker et al., under review).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Becker et al., under review
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
Ratings of two randomly selected sessions for each of the first ten patients-including sessions from all three therapists-indicated high levels of fidelity (M = 6.3, SD = 0.8) and competence (M = 5.0, SD = 0.0).
“Ratings of two randomly selected sessions for each of the first ten patients—including sessions from all three therapists—indicated high levels of fidelity (M = 6.3, SD = 0.8) and competence (M = 5.0, SD = 0.0).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Inter-rater reliability for 10% of randomly selected cases at pre-treatment was 100% (kappa = 1.0) for all comorbid diagnoses on the KSADS-PL.
“Inter-rater reliability for 10% of randomly selected cases at pre-treatment was 100% (kappa = 1.0) for all comorbid diagnoses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Findings suggest that CBT-AR may be a promising new treatment for children and adolescents with ARFID.
“Taken together, findings suggest that CBT-AR may be a promising new treatment for children and adolescents with ARFID.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Average post-treatment PARDI scores were still slightly higher than those observed in a prior study of healthy controls, suggesting that patients remained somewhat symptomatic after treatment completion.
“The fact that average post-treatment PARDI scores were still slightly higher than those observed in a prior study of healthy controls suggests that patients remained somewhat symptomatic after treatment completion (Bryant-Waugh et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bryant-Waugh et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The results highlight the potential for vomiting when conducting interoceptive exposures with patients who endorse nausea and post-prandial fullness.
“Our results highlight the potential for vomiting when conducting interoceptive exposures with patients who endorse nausea and post-prandial fullness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Because there was no control group, the study cannot rule out alternative rival hypotheses (e.g., passage of time or therapist attention) for symptom improvement.
“First, because there was no control group, we cannot rule out alternative rival hypotheses (e.g., that the passage of time, or therapist attention, was responsible for symptom improvement).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Inter-rater reliability of the ARFID diagnosis (yes/no) for 25% of randomly selected cases at both pre- and post-treatment was excellent (100% agreement; kappa = 1.0) for both patient and parent PARDI interviews.
“Inter-rater reliability of the ARFID diagnosis (yes/no) for 25% of randomly selected cases at both pre- and post-treatment was excellent (100% agreement; kappa = 1.0) for both patient and parent PARDI interviews.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Cronbach alphas for PARDI profiles ranged from .72 to .92 in the current sample for both patient and parent ratings.
“Cronbach alphas for PARDI profiles ranged from .72 to .92 in the current sample for both patient and parent ratings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- May combine two claims. 31
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 17
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataARFID severity scores on the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Interview significantly decreased per both patient and parent report from pre- to post-treatment.
“ARFID severity scores (on the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Interview) significantly decreased per both patient and parent report.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf 25 eligible individuals, 20 initiated treatment, including 17 completers and three dropouts.
“Of 25 eligible individuals, 20 initiated treatment, including 17 completers and three dropouts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNot all patients responded; three dropped out and 30% continued to meet criteria for ARFID.
“Of course, not all patients responded. Three dropped out and 30% continued to meet criteria for ARFID.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeither anxiety nor depression changed significantly during the course of treatment.
“Of note, neither anxiety nor depression changed significantly during the course of treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe underweight subgroup moved from approximately the 10th percentile to the 20th percentile for BMI from pre- to post-treatment (p < .001), a significant increase with large effect size.
“The underweight subgroup (n = 14) gained an average of 11.5 (SD = 6.0) pounds from pre- to post-treatment (p < .001), moving from approximately the 10th percentile to the 20th percentile for BMI (p < .001), representing a significant increase with a large effect size.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA second adverse event was grade 1-2 (mild to moderate), related to the protocol, and involved mouth tingling after tasting nuts during a session in the sensory sensitivity module; the patient was referred to the emergency department, given epinephrine, and diagnosed with a nut allergy.
“In a second adverse event, rated as grade 1–2 (mild to moderate) and related to the protocol, a patient experienced mouth tingling after tasting nuts during a session in the sensory sensitivity module. We referred the second patient to the emergency department where the patient was given epinephrine and diagnosed with a nut allergy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo non-completers were rated as having "no change" and a third as "minimally improved" on the CGI.
“Two non-completers were rated as having “no change” and a third as “minimally improved.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne adverse event was grade 1 (mild), related to the protocol, and involved a patient vomiting involuntarily during an in-session interoceptive exposure in the lack of interest module.
“In the first adverse event, rated as grade 1 (mild) and related to the protocol, a patient vomited involuntarily during an in-session interoceptive exposure (i.e., drinking several cups of water to experience fullness) in the lack of interest module.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnly three small randomized controlled trials of ARFID treatment have been published, and all have focused on young children ages 13 months to 12 years.
“Only three small randomized controlled trials have been published, and all have focused on young children ages 13 months to 12 years (Sharp et al., 2016; Sharp et al., 2017; Lock et al., 2019a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Sharp et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sharp et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lock et al., 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTreatments for pediatric feeding disorders typically focus on infants, toddlers, and preschool children and include interventions that are not developmentally appropriate for older children or adolescents.
“Treatments for pediatric feeding disorders typically focus on infants, toddlers, and preschool children and include interventions that are not developmentally appropriate for older children or adolescents (e.g., Williams & Foxx, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Williams & Foxx, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTreatments for specific phobia target fear of choking or vomiting but lack interventions to promote weight gain or resolve nutrition deficiencies.
“Treatments for specific phobia target fear of choking (McNally, 1994) or vomiting (Hunter & Antony 2009), but lack interventions to promote weight gain or resolve nutrition deficiencies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites McNally, 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hunter & Antony 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationTherapists audio-recorded all sessions so that an independent PhD rater could make fidelity and competence ratings based on published measures.
“Therapists audio-recorded all sessions so that an independent PhD rater (REL) could make fidelity (ranging from 1—“not at all adherent” to 7—“completely adherent”) and competence (ranging from 1—“not at all” to 5—“completely”) ratings based on published measures (Thomas & Eddy, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thomas & Eddy, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFindings provide evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and proof-of-concept for CBT-AR.
“Findings provide evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and proof-of-concept for CBT-AR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Improvements in ARFID symptoms, weight, and food variety observed from pre- to post-treatment are attributable to CBT-AR rather than to nonspecific factors, concurrent medical monitoring, or passage of time.
- Rests on an assumption: The sample of 20 patients who initiated treatment is representative of the broader population of children and adolescents with ARFID.
- Rests on an assumption: Therapists' post-treatment CGI ratings are unbiased by therapist allegiance or knowledge of treatment.
- Rests on an assumption: The number of new foods incorporated recorded by therapists is an accurate measure of patients' food incorporation.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCBT for eating disorders focuses on reducing shape and weight concerns, which are not central to ARFID.
“CBT for eating disorders focuses on reducing shape and weight concerns (Fairburn et al., 2008; Waller et al., 2019), which are not central to ARFID (Becker et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fairburn et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Waller et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Becker et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenResearch assistants who were not therapists in the trial conducted all assessments.
“Research assistants who were not therapists in the trial conducted all assessments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThis is the first study of an outpatient manualized psychosocial treatment for ARFID in older adolescents.
“This is the first study of an outpatient manualized psychosocial treatment for ARFID in older adolescents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe ORBIT model defines a proof-of-concept study as an uncontrolled within-subjects study that evaluates whether a novel intervention could plausibly offer clinically significant benefit that could later be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.
“ORBIT defines a proof-of-concept study as an uncontrolled within-subjects study that evaluates whether a novel intervention could plausibly offer clinically significant benefit that could later be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Czajkowski et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThere are evidence-based outpatient protocols for psychiatric disorders that resemble ARFID-including pediatric feeding disorders, eating disorders, and anxiety disorders-but none is appropriate for ARFID specifically.
“There are evidence-based outpatient protocols for psychiatric disorders that resemble ARFID—including pediatric feeding disorders, eating disorders, and anxiety disorders—but none is appropriate for ARFID specifically.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Williams & Foxx, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fairburn et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Waller et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov and approved by the Partners Human Research Committee prior to recruitment.
“The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02963220) and approved by the Partners Human Research Committee prior to recruitment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe PARDI was administered by independent assessors who did not serve as study therapists.
“The PARDI was administered by independent assessors (MCK, JHJ, OBW, ACK) who did not serve as study therapists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCBT-AR demonstrated initial evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and proof-of-concept for children and adolescents in this uncontrolled trial.
“In conclusion, CBT-AR demonstrated initial evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and proof-of-concept for children and adolescents in this uncontrolled trial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAvailable data suggest that the low appetite reported by those with the lack of interest presentation of ARFID may be neurobiologically mediated.
“Indeed, available data suggest that the low appetite reported by those with the lack of interest presentation of ARFID may be neurobiologically mediated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Becker et al., under review
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenTo the authors' knowledge, this is the first study of an outpatient psychosocial treatment for ARFID in older adolescents.
“To our knowledge, this is the first study of an outpatient psychosocial treatment for ARFID in older adolescents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe sample size was small, so p-values and effect sizes must be interpreted with caution.
“Second, the sample size was small, so p-values and effect sizes must be interpreted with caution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe initial study of 20 patients provides preliminary evidence for feasibility, acceptability, and proof-of-concept for CBT-AR in an outpatient sample of relatively mild severity.
“Our initial study of 20 patients provides preliminary evidence for feasibility, acceptability, and proof-of-concept for CBT-AR in an outpatient sample of relatively mild severity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe average pre-treatment STAIC and CDI-2 scores in the sample were near the mean for healthy individuals, suggesting little room for improvement.
“However, the average pre-treatment STAIC and CDI-2 scores in our sample were near the mean for healthy individuals, suggesting little room for improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe treatment was provided by one of three PhD therapists; two were authors of the treatment manual and the third was trained and supervised by the manual authors.
“The treatment was provided by one of three PhD therapists (JJT, KRB, or KTE). Two of the three therapists were the authors of the treatment manual and the third was trained and supervised by the manual authors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataCronbach alpha for PARDI severity was .65 for patients and .57 for parents.
“Cronbach alpha for severity was lower (.65 for patients and .57 for parents).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataOnly two of the 20 participants received the individual version of CBT-AR, which limits the conclusions that can be drawn about proof-of-concept for this therapeutic format in youth.
“Lastly, only two of the 20 participants received the individual version of CBT-AR, which limits the conclusions that can be drawn about proof-of-concept for this therapeutic format in youth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBy both patient- and parent-report, ARFID severity and sensory sensitivity showed significant reductions, whereas patients but not parents reported significant reductions in lack of interest in eating or food.
“It is notable that, by both patient- and parent- report, ARFID severity and sensory sensitivity showed significant reductions, whereas patients (but not parents) reported significant reductions in lack of interest in eating or food.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe ORBIT model of intervention development suggests that successful proof-of-concept studies be followed up with randomized controlled trials.
“The ORBIT model of intervention development suggests that successful proof-of-concept studies be followed up with randomized controlled trials (Czajkowski et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Czajkowski et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenStudy therapists met weekly for peer supervision.
“Study therapists met weekly for peer supervision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe results extend upon the prior study by demonstrating positive effects of CBT in a larger sample and highlighting that CBT may lead to significant symptom reduction even when delivered in a less time-intensive and more cost-effective weekly outpatient format.
“However, our results extend upon the prior study by demonstrating positive effects of CBT in a larger sample and highlighting that CBT may lead to significant symptom reduction even when delivered in a less time-intensive and more cost-effective weekly outpatient format.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataCronbach alpha was .94 for the FNS in the current sample.
“Cronbach alpha was .94 for the current sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBoth patients who experienced adverse events remained in treatment, suggesting they may have been willing to experience some discomfort for the possibility of reducing ARFID symptoms.
“Of note, both patients who experienced adverse events remained in the treatment, suggesting that they may have been willing to experience some discomfort for the possibility of reducing ARFID symptoms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationGiven that the majority of patients received the family-supported version of CBT-AR, the findings are consistent with recent case series and one pilot RCT of young children that reported positive effects of FBT for ARFID.
“Given that the majority of patients in our study received the family-supported version of CBT-AR, our findings are also consistent with recent case series (Lock et al., 2019b; Rienecke et al., 2020) and one pilot RCT of young children (Lock et al., 2019a) that have reported positive effects of FBT for ARFID.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lock et al., 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rienecke et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lock et al., 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe primary outcome measure-the PARDI interview-was conducted by assessors who were not therapists in the current study.
“Second, the primary outcome measure—the PARDI interview—was conducted by assessors who were not therapists in the current study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataTherapists delivered CBT-AR according to a published manual and exhibited high levels of treatment fidelity as confirmed by an independent rater.
“First, therapists delivered CBT-AR according to a published manual and exhibited high levels of treatment fidelity as confirmed by an independent rater.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningBecause patients were recruited from a larger neurobiology study, they had to meet inclusion criteria (e.g., ability to complete MRI) that would not normally be applied in routine clinical care and were offered monetary compensation for completing assessments, which could limit generalizability of the findings.
“Fourth, because we recruited our sample from a larger neurobiology study of ARFID, patients had to meet some inclusion criteria (e.g., ability to complete MRI) that would not normally be applied in routine clinical care and were offered monetary compensation for completing assessments, which could limit generalizability of the findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataPre-treatment PARDI scores were fairly low, which may limit generalizability to those with more severe presentations.
“Third, pre-treatment PARDI scores were fairly low, which may limit generalizability to those with more severe presentations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenPatients were not allowed to receive any other interventions-such as nutrition counseling, occupational therapy, speech therapy, or other forms of psychotherapy-during the trial.
“Patients were not allowed to receive any other interventions—such as nutrition counseling, occupational therapy, speech therapy, or other forms of psychotherapy—during the trial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataPatients and families rated CBT-AR as credible upon starting treatment and satisfactory upon completing it.
“Patients and families rated CBT-AR as credible upon starting treatment and satisfactory upon completing it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe majority of patients offered CBT-AR elected to take it up, and few patients dropped out.
“Specifically, the majority of patients offered the treatment elected to take it up, and few patients dropped out.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataCronbach alpha was .85 for the STAIC trait subscale in the current sample.
“Cronbach alpha was .85 in the current sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataCronbach alpha was .72 for the CDI-2 in the current sample.
“Cronbach alpha was .72 in the current sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTherapists, patients, and parents reported significant improvements on multiple measures of ARFID symptoms, ranging from incorporation of new foods to significant gains in weight.
“Therapists, patients, and parents reported significant improvements on multiple measures of ARFID symptoms, ranging from the incorporation of new foods to significant gains in weight.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Improvements in ARFID symptoms, weight, and food variety observed from pre- to post-treatment are attributable to CBT-AR rather than to nonspecific factors, concurrent medical monitoring, or passage of time.
“ORBIT defines a proof-of-concept study as an uncontrolled within-subjects study that evaluates whether a novel intervention could plausibly offer clinically significant benefit that could later be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The sample of 20 patients who initiated treatment is representative of the broader population of children and adolescents with ARFID.
“Of 25 eligible individuals, 20 initiated treatment, including 17 completers and three dropouts.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Therapists' post-treatment CGI ratings are unbiased by therapist allegiance or knowledge of treatment.
“Therapists provided CGI ratings on their own patients at post-treatment and we interpreted a score of 1 or 2 (much or very much improved, respectively) as representing positive treatment response (Wilhelm et al., 2011).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The number of new foods incorporated recorded by therapists is an accurate measure of patients' food incorporation.
“At post-treatment, therapists recorded the number of new foods that their patients had incorporated during the course of CBT-AR.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Non-completers did not change from pre- to post-treatment.
“we conducted a series of paired t-tests to evaluate change in pre- versus post-outcome measures, assuming no change in non-completers.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Preliminary evidence has supported cognitive behavioural therapy for ARFID as an effective treatment for heterogeneous presentations of ARFID in children, adolescents, and adults.
“In particular, preliminary evidence has supported cognitive behavioural therapy for ARFID as an effective treatment for heterogeneous presentations of ARFID in children, adolescents, and adults.[90][91][92]”
From Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder and Severe Food Selectivity in Children and Young People with Autism: A Scoping Review (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
In a prior study of CBT-AR in children and adolescents (ages 10-17), 85% completed treatment.
“In that study, the majority of patients (85%) completed treatment, and completers reported high levels of treatment satisfaction. Furthermore, patients demonstrated significant decreases in ARFID severity from pre- to post-treatment, added an average of 16.7 novel foods to their diet, and—at the conclusion of treatment—70% no longer met criteria for ARFID (Thomas et al., 2020).”
From Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adults with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (2021) · cites this paper as Thomas et al., 2020
In a prior study of CBT-AR in children and adolescents, completers reported high levels of treatment satisfaction.
“In that study, the majority of patients (85%) completed treatment, and completers reported high levels of treatment satisfaction. Furthermore, patients demonstrated significant decreases in ARFID severity from pre- to post-treatment, added an average of 16.7 novel foods to their diet, and—at the conclusion of treatment—70% no longer met criteria for ARFID (Thomas et al., 2020).”
From Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adults with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (2021) · cites this paper as Thomas et al., 2020
In a prior study of CBT-AR in children and adolescents, patients added an average of 16.7 novel foods.
“In that study, the majority of patients (85%) completed treatment, and completers reported high levels of treatment satisfaction. Furthermore, patients demonstrated significant decreases in ARFID severity from pre- to post-treatment, added an average of 16.7 novel foods to their diet, and—at the conclusion of treatment—70% no longer met criteria for ARFID (Thomas et al., 2020).”
From Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adults with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (2021) · cites this paper as Thomas et al., 2020
The post-treatment remission rate of 47% was somewhat lower than the 70% reported for children and adolescents in a previous trial.
“Although adults in this study made significant improvements with CBT-AR, the post-treatment remission rate of 47% was somewhat lower than the 70% we reported for our previous trial of CBT-AR in children and adolescents (Thomas et al., 2020).”
From Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adults with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (2021) · cites this paper as Thomas et al., 2020
In a prior study of CBT-AR in children and adolescents, patients demonstrated significant decreases in ARFID severity from pre- to post-treatment.
“In that study, the majority of patients (85%) completed treatment, and completers reported high levels of treatment satisfaction. Furthermore, patients demonstrated significant decreases in ARFID severity from pre- to post-treatment, added an average of 16.7 novel foods to their diet, and—at the conclusion of treatment—70% no longer met criteria for ARFID (Thomas et al., 2020).”
From Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adults with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (2021) · cites this paper as Thomas et al., 2020
In a prior study of CBT-AR in children and adolescents, 70% no longer met criteria for ARFID at conclusion.
“In that study, the majority of patients (85%) completed treatment, and completers reported high levels of treatment satisfaction. Furthermore, patients demonstrated significant decreases in ARFID severity from pre- to post-treatment, added an average of 16.7 novel foods to their diet, and—at the conclusion of treatment—70% no longer met criteria for ARFID (Thomas et al., 2020).”
From Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adults with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (2021) · cites this paper as Thomas et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
CGI improvement scores are labeled in reverse order
MinorThe CGI definition assigns "very much improved" to a score of 1, but the subsequent interpretation labels a score of 1 "much improved" and a score of 2 "very much improved," respectively.
“The CGI provides a global rating of symptom change with scores ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse) (Guy, 1976).”
“we interpreted a score of 1 or 2 (much or very much improved, respectively) as representing positive treatment response”
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369 · see citing works
(1970) · Cited by 24,983 · see citing works
(1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,899 · see citing works
CDC GROWTH CHARTS FOR THE UNITED STATES: METHODS AND DEVELOPMENT 2000
Kuczmarski, R. J., Ogden, C. L., Guo, S. S., Strawn, L. G., Flegal, K. M., & Mei, Z. (2002) · Cited by 6,426 · see citing works
2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development.
Kuczmarski, R. J., Ogden, C. L., Guo, S. S., Grummer‐Strawn, L. M., Flegal, K. M., Mei, Z., Wei, R. X., Curtin, L. R., Roche, A. F., & Johnson, C. L. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 3,716 · see citing works
Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire
Devilly, G. J., & Borkovec, T. D. (2000) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0005-7916(00)00012-4 · Cited by 2,295 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire.”
MethodDevelopment of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans
Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-w · Cited by 2,137 · see citing works
The client satisfaction questionnaire
Attkisson, C. C., & Zwick, R. (1982) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(82)90074-x · Cited by 1,743 · see citing works
From ideas to efficacy: The ORBIT model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases
Czajkowski, S. M., Powell, L. H., Adler, N., Naar-King, S., Reynolds, K. D., Hunter, C. M., Laraia, B., Olster, D. H., Perna, F. M., Peterson, J. C., et al. (2015) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000161 · Cited by 1,161 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The ORBIT model of intervention development suggests that successful proof-of-concept studies be followed up with randomized controlled trials (Czajkowski et al., 2015).”
MethodCognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders
Mitchell, J. E. (2009) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.09bk05121 · Cited by 886 · see citing works
Nicely, T. A., Lane‐Loney, S. E., Masciulli, E., Hollenbeak, C. S., & Ornstein, R. M. (2014) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-014-0021-3 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Norris, M. L., Robinson, A., Obeid, N., Harrison, M. E., Spettigue, W. J., & Henderson, K. A. (2013) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22217 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Bryant‐Waugh, R., Micali, N., Cooke, L. J., Lawson, E. A., Eddy, K. T., & Thomas, J. J. (2018) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22958 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Self-citationEarly-onset restrictive eating disturbances in primary school boys and girls
Kurz, S., Dyck, Z. V., Dremmel, D., Munsch, S., & Hilbert, A. (2014) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-014-0622-z · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Kambanis, P. E., Kuhnle, M. C., Wons, O. B., Jo, J. H., Keshishian, A. C., Hauser, K., Becker, K. R., Franko, D. L., Misra, M., Micali, N., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23191 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citationBrief Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Non-Underweight Patients: CBT-T for Eating Disorders
Waller, G., Turner, H. M., Tatham, M., Mountford, V. A., & Wade, T. D. (2019) · doi:10.4324/9780367192280 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Modular Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy for Body Dysmorphic Disorder
Wilhelm, S., Phillips, K. A., Fama, J. M., Greenberg, J. L., & Steketee, G. S. (2011) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2011.02.002 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationChoking phobia: A review of the literature
McNally, R. J. (1994) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0010-440x(94)90174-0 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Sharp, W. G., Stubbs, K. H., Adams, H., Wells, B. M., Lesack, R. S., Criado, K. K., Simon, E. L., McCracken, C. E., West, L. L., & Scahill, L. D. (2016) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000001043 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Dumont, E., Jansen, A., Kroes, D., de Haan, E., & Mulkens, S. (2019) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23053 · Cited by 98 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…emerging therapies for older children and adolescents have been briefly outlined in book chapters (Fitzpatrick et al., 2015) or journal articles (Dumont et al., 2019; Lock et al., 2019b), none have been comprehensively described in treatment manuals that could facilitate empirical testing or…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialLock, J., Sadeh‐Sharvit, S., & L'Insalata, A. (2019) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23077 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Becker, K. R., Keshishian, A. C., Liebman, R. E., Coniglio, K., Wang, S. B., Franko, D. L., Eddy, K. T., & Thomas, J. J. (2018) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22988 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationLock, J., Robinson, A., Sadeh‐Sharvit, S., Rosania, K., Osipov, L., Kirz, N., Derenne, J., & Utzinger, L. (2019) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22994 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Zucker, N. L., LaVia, M. C., Craske, M. G., Foukal, M., Harris, A. A., Datta, N., Savereide, E., & Maslow, G. R. (2019) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22996 · Cited by 88 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A growing number of reports have highlighted the potential application of cognitive-behavioral (Gormez et al., 2018; Steen et al., 2018; Zucker et al., 2019), family-based (Eckhardt et al.”
BackgroundSpettigue, W. J., Norris, M. L., Santos, A., & Obeid, N. (2018) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-018-0205-3 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Family therapy for adolescent eating and weight disorders: new applications
Hill, F. (2016) · Advances in Eating Disorders · doi:10.1080/21662630.2016.1172914 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Emetophobia: The Role of Interoceptive Exposure
Hunter, P. V., & Antony, M. M. (2009) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2008.08.002 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Aulinas, A., Marengi, D. A., Galbiati, F., Asanza, E., Slattery, M. J., Mancuso, C. J., Wons, O. B., Micali, N., Bern, E. M., Eddy, K. T., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23261 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationCase 18-2017 — An 11-Year-Old Girl with Difficulty Eating after a Choking Incident
Thomas, J. J., Brigham, K. S., Sally, S. T., Hazen, E. P., & Eddy, K. T. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcpc1616394 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationBryson, A. E., Scipioni, A. M., Essayli, J. H., Mahoney, J. R., & Ornstein, R. M. (2018) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22853 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Makhzoumi, S. H., Schreyer, C. C., Hansen, J. L., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23049 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Dahlsgaard, K. K., & Bodie, J. (2018) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2018.11.001 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Eckhardt, S., Martell, C., Lowe, K. D., Grange, D. L., & Ehrenreich, J. T. (2019) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-019-0267-x · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Sharp, W. G., Allen, A. G., Stubbs, K. H., Criado, K. K., Sanders, R., McCracken, C. E., Parsons, R. G., Scahill, L. D., & Gourley, S. L. (2017) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2017.126 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: An adult case responding to cognitive behavioral therapy
Görmez, A., Kılıç, A., & Kırpınar, İ. (2018) · Clinical Case Studies · doi:10.1177/1534650118795286 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Steen, E., & Wade, T. D. (2018) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22832 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Rienecke, R. D., Drayton, A. K., Richmond, R. L., & Mammel, K. A. (2019) · Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1359104519864129 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Becker K. R. Mancuso C. Azanza E. Izquierdo A. Wons O. Dreier M. Slattery M. Plessow F. Micali N. Eddy K. T. Thomas J. J. Misra M. &Lawson E. A.(under review). Distinct ghrelin and PYY response in adolescent girls with low‐weight avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder compared to anorexia nervosa and healthy controls.
- Fairburn C. G., 2008, Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders, 309
- Kovacs M., 1992, Children's depression inventory: Manual, Q8
- Thomas J. J., 2019, Cognitive‐behavioral therapy for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: Children, adolescents, and adults
- Williams K. E., 2007, Treating eating problems of children with autism spectrum disorders and developmental disabilities: Interventions for professionals and parents
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bourne, L., Mandy, W., & Bryant‐Waugh, R. (2022) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.15139 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Management of eating disorders for people with higher weight: clinical practice guideline
Ralph, A. F., Brennan, L., Byrne, S., Caldwell, B., Farmer, J., Hart, L. M., Heruc, G. A., Maguire, S., Piya, M. K., Quin, J., et al. (2022) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-022-00622-w · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adults with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder
Thomas, J. J., Becker, K. R., Breithaupt, L., Murray, H. B., Jo, J. H., Kuhnle, M. C., Dreier, M. J., Harshman, S., Kahn, D. L., Hauser, K., et al. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.jbct.2020.10.004 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Thomas, J. J., Becker, K. R., Kuhnle, M. C., Jo, J. H., Harshman, S. G., Wons, O. B., Keshishian, A. C., Hauser, K., Breithaupt, L., Liebman, R. E., Misra, M., Wilhelm, S., Lawson, E. A., & Eddy, K. T.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- University of Louisville (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thomas, Jennifer J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Eating Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-08-09
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1636-1646
- ISSN
- 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-108X
- PMC
- PMC7719612
- OpenAlex
- W3048392172
- Semantic Scholar
- ace505ea01e7f5b64dd6b04c30d5b716ccb2756d
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15
- FWCI
- 6.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH108595)
- Global Foundation for Eating Disorders
- American Psychological Foundation
- Hilda and Preston Davis Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, children and adolescents, treatment feasibility, treatment acceptability, proof of concept, family-based treatment, weight gain, underweight, eating disorders, psychosocial interventions
- MeSH terms
- Proof of Concept Study, Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder, Adolescent, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Child, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review