Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Individual dietary specialization in a generalist predator: A stable isotope analysis of urban and rural red foxes

Scholz, Carolin, Firozpoor, Jasmin, Kramer‐Schadt, Stephanie, Gras, Pierre, Schulze, Christoph, Kimmig, Sophia E., Voigt, Christian C., Ortmann, Sylvia·2020·Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

Some carnivores are known to survive well in urban habitats, yet the underlying behavioral tactics are poorly understood. One likely explanation for the success in urban habitats might be that carnivores are generalist consumers. However, urban populations of carnivores could as well consist of specialist feeders. Here, we compared the isotopic specialization of red foxes in urban and rural environments, using both a population and an individual level perspective. We measured stable isotope ratios in increments of red fox whiskers and potential food sources. Our results reveal that red foxes have a broad isotopic dietary niche and a large variation in resource use. Despite this large variation, we found significant differences between the variance of the urban and rural population for δ 13 C as well as δ 15 N values, suggesting a habitat‐specific foraging behavior. Although urban regions are more heterogeneous regarding land cover (based on the Shannon index) than rural regions, the dietary range of urban foxes was smaller compared with that of rural conspecifics. Moreover, the higher δ 13 C values and lower δ 15 N values of urban foxes suggest a relatively high input of anthropogenic food sources. The diet of most individuals remained largely constant over a longer period. The low intraindividual variability of urban and rural red foxes suggests a relatively constant proportion of food items consumed by individuals. Urban and rural foxes utilized a small proportion of the potentially available isotopic dietary niche as indicated by the low within‐individual variation compared to the between‐individual variation. We conclude that generalist fox populations consist of individual food specialists in urban and rural populations at least over those periods covered by our study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ece3.6584

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 91

  1. 10.1111/j.1469‐7998.1998.tb00038.x · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s00300‐008‐0498‐9 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1461‐0248.2011.01662.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1006/anbe.1999.1285 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.2981/0909‐6396(2006)12[39:TPIORF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1469‐7998.2011.00887.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00861.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1086/342800 · doi:10.1086/342800
  9. 10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.009 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1890/0012‐9658(2002)083[2936:MILRS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1086/343878 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Börner K., 2009, Wittstatt U. Untersuchungen zur Populationsökologie des Rotfuchses (Vulpes vulpes L.) in Berlin. Beiträge zur Jagd‐und, Wildforschung, 34, 307
  13. Calisti M., 1990, Food habits and trophic niche variation of the red fox Vulpes vulpes (L., 1758) in a Mediterranean coastal area, Revue D’ecologie (France), 45, 410
  14. 10.2981/wlb.1995.0030 · DOI
  15. Cavallini P., 1996, Variation in the diet of the red fox in a Mediterranean area, Revue D’écologie, 51, 173
  16. 10.1111/j.1365‐2656.2007.01238.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1078/1616‐5047‐00123 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/j.1365‐2907.2008.00120.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1139/f95-526 · doi:10.1139/f95-526
  20. 10.1007/s00442‐005‐0118‐0 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1139/z02‐149 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1111/j.1469‐7998.2008.00509.x · DOI
  23. 10.2307/3545816 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.actao.2006.12.007 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/0016‐7037(78)90199‐0 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/0016‐7037(81)90244‐1 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2011.00206.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.2307/1382166 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Drygala F., 2013, Diet composition of the invasive raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and the native red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in north‐east, Germany, Hystrix, 24, 190
  30. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2000.tb00053.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. Englund J., 1965, Studies on food ecology of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in Sweden, Viltrevy, 3, 378
  32. 10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb01788.x · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s00300-012-1181-8 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/BF02189737 · DOI
  36. 10.1126/science.1150195 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1981.tb00003.x · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.2307/2403833 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.2307/1368807 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1111/j.1748-7692.1997.tb00645.x · doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.1997.tb00645.x
  41. 10.1139/Z08-137 · DOI
  42. 10.1017/S0031182099005351 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1111/j.1365‐2656.2011.01806.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. Jankowiak L., 2008, Habitat use, food and the importance of poultry in the diet of the red fox Vulpes vulpes in extensive farmland in Poland, World Applied Sciences Journal, 4, 886
  45. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1093/auk/117.3.718 · doi:10.1093/auk/117.3.718
  47. 10.1016/j.rse.2012.08.008 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1139/z03-088 · DOI
  49. 10.1890/0012‐9658(2007)88[42:CSIRPF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1111/j.1600‐0587.1998.tb00552.x · DOI · Paper page
  51. Macdonald D. W., 2011, Running with the fox
  52. 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.018 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1111/j.1469‐185X.2008.00064.x · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1111/j.1365‐2656.2010.01753.x · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1641/0006‐3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1007/s11252‐007‐0045‐4 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1002/wsb.599 · doi:10.1002/wsb.599
  58. 10.2193/2005‐527 · DOI
  59. 10.1071/WR99015 · DOI
  60. 10.1086/282957 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1111/ecog.01128 · DOI
  62. 10.1002/rcm.8003 · DOI
  63. 10.1007/s00442-014-3205-2 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1644/09-MAMM-A-362.1 · DOI
  65. 10.1890/07-1812.1 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1002/ecs2.1282 · DOI
  67. 10.1111/ele.12187 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1981.tb04596.x · DOI
  69. 10.1007/s10344-013-0709-8 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.mambio.2016.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1139/Z07‐120 · DOI
  72. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009672 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1007/s004420100786 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1139/z04‐179 · DOI
  75. 10.1007/s10344-012-0679-2 · doi:10.1007/s10344-012-0679-2
  76. 10.1086/286113 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1139/z00‐008 · doi:10.1139/z00-008
  78. 10.1086/282807 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Saunders G., 1993, Urban foxes (Vulpes vulpes): Food acquisition, time and energy budgeting of a generalized predator, Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 65, 215
  80. 10.1139/cjz-2013-0283 · DOI
  81. Stock B. C., 2013, MixSIAR User Manual. 3.1.
  82. 10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x · DOI · Paper page
  83. Tibbets T. M., 2007, Isotopic enrichment without change in diet: An ontogenetic shift in δ15N during insect metamorphosis, Functional Ecology, 22, 109, 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01342.x · DOI
  84. 10.1007/BF00379558 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1073/pnas.0709263105 · DOI · Paper page
  86. 10.1515/9781400883790 · DOI · Paper page
  87. 10.1111/jzo.12566 · DOI
  88. 10.1371/journal.pone.0101917 · DOI
  89. 10.1525/cond.2010.100020 · DOI
  90. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01429.x · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.1007/s00114‐012‐0896‐2 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Scholz, C., Firozpoor, J., Kramer‐Schadt, S., Gras, P., Schulze, C., Kimmig, S. E., Voigt, C. C., & Ortmann, S.
Venue
Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-17
Volume
10
Issue
16
Pages
8855-8870
ISSN
2045-7758
Cited by
66
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.