Cited by 37Plant and animal studiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Sweet tooth: Elephants detect fruit sugar levels based on scent alone

Open access
Nevo, Omer, Schmitt, Melissa H., Ayasse, Manfred, Valenta, Kim·2020·Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

The ability to assess food quality is crucial to all organisms. Fleshy fruits are a major source of nutrients to various animals, and unlike most food sources, have evolved to be attractive and to be consumed by animals to promote seed dispersal. It has recently been established that fruit scent—the bouquet of volatile chemicals emitted by ripe fruit—is an evolved communication system between plants and animals. Further, it has been argued that chemicals that are synthesized from sugar and its products may be an honest signal for sugar content and fruit quality. Elephants are important seed dispersers for numerous species and possess an olfactory system that is likely to outperform most other animals. We tested the hypothesis that fruit scent signifies sugar content and that elephants are capable of assessing fruit sugar levels based on scent alone. Using a paired‐choice test of marula fruits (Sclerocarya birrea) by semitame African elephants, we show that elephants are capable of identifying more sugar‐rich fruits based on scent alone and that this is likely based on two chemical compounds: ethanol and ethyl acetate, both downstream products of sugar fermentation. These results shed light on the mechanisms driving elephant feeding ecology, plant signaling, and the coevolutionary process between angiosperms and animal seed dispersers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ece3.6777

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • African savanna elephants can use olfactory cues to discriminate between preferred and nonpreferred plants, between fruits with different sugar levels, and between odors of closely related human family members, including sibling pairs.

    “African savanna elephants can use olfactory cues to discriminate between preferred and nonpreferred plants (Schmitt et al., 2018), between fruits with different sugar levels (Nevo et al., 2020), and between odors of closely related human family members, including sibling pairs (in a match-to-sample task; von Dürckheim et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Schaefer, H. M., & Ruxton, G. D. (2011). Animal‐plant communication, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nevo, O., Schmitt, M. H., Ayasse, M., & Valenta, K.
Affiliations
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Nevo, Omer
Venue
Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-09-11
Volume
10
Issue
20
Pages
11399-11407
ISSN
2045-7758 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3085773356
Cited by
36
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (NE 2156/1‐1, NE 2156/1‐2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
elephants, sugar detection, olfaction, marula, seed dispersal, plant-animal coevolution, plant chemical signaling, ethanol, ethyl acetate, feeding ecology, food quality assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review