Elephants have a nose for quantity
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Although many animal species have demonstrated an ability to differentiate between more and less when presented with different amounts of food, they have done so primarily using vision. In this study, by contrast, elephants showed that they can detect differences between various quantities of food using only their sense of smell. Thus, elephants may be unique in their use of olfaction in cognitive tasks. This research suggests that it is important for psychologists to incorporate into experimental designs the ways in which different animals interact with their environment using all of their senses. Such species-specific paradigms would ensure comparisons about cognition across taxa are fair and relevant.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Elephants are likely to have much richer olfactory experiences than humans but less richly detailed visual experiences.
“For example, given their sensory abilities, elephants are likely to have much richer olfactory experiences than humans but less richly detailed visual experiences [14–16].”
From Dimensions of Animal Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as [15]
The paper’s discussion of elephant sensory abilities (page not provided) says that elephants use vision mainly to complement their more dominant senses, including smell. Its Significance section shows that elephants can distinguish food quantities by smell alone. Neither passage compares the richness of elephants’ olfactory experiences with humans’ or establishes that their visual experiences are less detailed. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOther studies on elephant quantity discrimination have found different results, which were consistent with the accumulator model.
“However, other studies on elephant quantity discrimination have found different results, which were consistent with the accumulator model (Perdue et al., 2012; Plotnik et al., 2019; Snyder et al., 2021).”
From Do elephants really never forget? What we know about elephant memory and a call for further investigation (2025) · cites this paper as Plotnik et al., 2019
The Results and Discussion report differing findings across elephant quantity-discrimination studies and say this study’s results follow an approximation model and Weber’s law. Our copy does not identify that model as the accumulator model, so it supports the contrast in results but not the specific model attribution. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAsian elephants have demonstrated the ability to discriminate between different quantities of food using only olfactory cues.
“In addition, Asian elephants have demonstrated the ability to discriminate between different quantities of food using only olfactory cues (Plotnik et al., 2019).”
From Do elephants really never forget? What we know about elephant memory and a call for further investigation (2025) · cites this paper as Plotnik et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism*
Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856888x00122 · Cited by 1,911 · see citing works
How the olfactory system makes sense of scents
Firestein, S. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35093026 · Cited by 1,261 · see citing works
The Mentality of Crows: Convergent Evolution of Intelligence in Corvids and Apes
Emery, N. J., & Clayton, N. S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1098410 · Cited by 1,199 · see citing works
Self-citationThe evolution of self-control.
MacLean, E. L., Hare, B., Nunn, C. L., Addessi, E., Amici, F., Anderson, R. C., Aureli, F., Baker, J. M., Bania, A. E., Barnard, A. M., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323533111 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Self-citationLipton, J. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01453 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes
Feigenson, L., Carey, S. E., & HAUSER, M. D. (2002) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00427 · Cited by 695 · see citing works
Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo
McComb, K., Packer, C., & Pusey, A. E. (1994) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.1994.1052 · Cited by 603 · see citing works
Primate Social Relationships: an Integrated Approach
Hinde, R. A. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 583 · see citing works
Wilson, M. L., HAUSER, M. D., & Wrangham, R. W. (2001) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1706 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
Cantlon, J. F., Platt, M. L., & Brannon, E. M. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.007 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Megagardeners of the forest – the role of elephants in seed dispersal
Campos-Arceiz, A., & Blake, S. (2011) · Acta Oecologica · doi:10.1016/j.actao.2011.01.014 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Long-distance communication of acoustic cues to social identity in African elephants
McComb, K., Reby, D., Baker, L., Moss, C. J., & Sayialel, S. (2003) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2047 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Rutting Behavior in African Elephants: the Phenomenon of Musth
Poole, J. H. (1987) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853986x00171 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Announcing intent: the aggressive state of musth in African elephants
Poole, J. H. (1989) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(89)90014-6 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
van Beest, F. M., Mysterud, A., Loe, L. E., & Milner, J. M. (2010) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01701.x · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Wittemyer, G., Getz, W. M., Vollrath, F. W., & Douglas‐Hamilton, I. (2007) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-007-0432-0 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
The Amboseli Elephants: A Long-Term Perspective on a Long-Lived Mammal
Moss, C. J., Croze, H., & Lee, P. C. (2011) · University of Chicago Press · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226542263.001.0001 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Quantity-based judgments in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris)
Ward, C., & Smuts, B. B. (2006) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-006-0042-7 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Bears ‘count’ too: quantity estimation and comparison in black bears, Ursus americanus
Vonk, J. M., & Beran, M. J. (2012) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.05.001 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Keeping an “Ear” to the Ground: Seismic Communication in Elephants
O'Connell‐Rodwell, C. E. (2007) · Physiology · doi:10.1152/physiol.00008.2007 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Elephants Classify Human Ethnic Groups by Odor and Garment Color
Bates, L. A., Sayialel, K. N., Njiraini, N., Moss, C. J., Poole, J. H., & Byrne, R. W. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.09.060 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Estimating and operating on discrete quantities in Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus).
Call, J. (2000) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.114.2.136 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Mumby, H. S., & Plotnik, J. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00122 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citationFree-ranging dogs assess the quantity of opponents in intergroup conflicts
Bonanni, R., Natoli, E., Cafazzo, S., & Valsecchi, P. (2010) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-010-0348-3 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Factors mediating inter-group encounters in savannah baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus)
Kitchen, D. M., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2004) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853904322890816 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Large quantity discrimination by North Island robins (Petroica longipes)
Garland, A., Low, J., & Burns, K. C. (2012) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0537-3 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Perdue, B. M., Talbot, C. F., Stone, A. M., & Beran, M. J. (2012) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0521-y · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Elephant cognition in primate perspective
Byrne, R. W., Bates, L. A., & Moss, C. J. (2009) · Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews · doi:10.3819/ccbr.2009.40009 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Plotnik, J. M., Shaw, R. C., Brubaker, D. L., Tiller, L. N., & Clayton, N. S. (2013) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.11.011 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationCarazo, P., Font, E., Forteza-Behrendt, E., & Desfilis, E. (2009) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0207-7 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Relative quantity judgment by Asian elephants (Elephas maximus)
Irie-Sugimoto, N., Kobayashi, T., Sato, T., & Hasegawa, T. (2009) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0185-9 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Perdue, B. M., Talbot, K., Stone, A., & Beran, M. J. (2011) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e597922013-020 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, can distinguish more over-marks from fewer over-marks
Ferkin, M. H., Pierce, A. A., Sealand, R. O., et al. (2004) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-004-0244-9 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Quantity judgments of sequentially presented food items by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)
Evans, T. A., Beran, M. J., Harris, E. H., & Rice, D. F. (2008) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0174-z · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Numerosity differences and effects of stimulus density on pigeons’ discrimination performance
Emmerton, J. (1998) · Animal Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/bf03199218 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Acoustic communication in the Asian elephant, Elephas maximus maximus
de Silva, S. (2010) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/000579510x495762 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
African elephants use plant odours to make foraging decisions across multiple spatial scales
Schmitt, M. H., Shuttleworth, A., Ward, D., & Shrader, A. M. (2018) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.04.016 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Smelling more or less: Investigating the olfactory experience of the domestic dog
Horowitz, A., Hecht, J., & Dedrick, A. (2013) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2013.02.002 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Relative quantity judgments in South American sea lions (Otaria flavescens)
Zamorano-Abramson, J., Hernández‐Lloreda, M. V., Call, J., & Colmenares, F. (2011) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-011-0404-7 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Predator choice in the field; grouping guppies, Poecilia reticulata, receive more attacks
Botham, M. S., Kerfoot, C. J., Louca, V., & Krause, J. (2005) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0018-7 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Plotnik, J. M., Pokorny, J. J., Keratimanochaya, T., Webb, C., Beronja, H. F., Hennessy, A., Hill, J., Hill, V. J., Kiss, R., Maguire, C., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061174 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantity judgments of auditory and visual stimuli by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
Beran, M. J. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes · doi:10.1037/a0024965 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Miller, A. K., Hensman, M. C., Hensman, S., Schultz, K., Reid, P., Shore, M., Brown, J. S., Furton, K. G., & Lee, S. J. (2015) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.003 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Zamorano-Abramson, J., Hernández‐Lloreda, M. V., Call, J., & Colmenares, F. (2013) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2013.02.006 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Unique numerical competence of Asian elephants on the relative numerosity judgment task
Irie, N., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M., & Kutsukake, N. (2019) · Journal of Ethology · doi:10.1007/s10164-018-0563-y · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Beran, M. J., McIntyre, J. M., Garland, A., & Evans, T. A. (2013) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.022 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
von Dürckheim, K. E. M., Hoffman, L. C., Leslie, A., Hensman, M. C., Hensman, S., Schultz, K., & Lee, S. (2018) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2017.12.004 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Elephant psychology: What we know and what we would like to know
Irie, N., & Hasegawa, T. (2009) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5884.2009.00404.x · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Plotnik, J. M., & Clayton, N. S. (2015) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9383.003.0006 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationGarland, A., Beran, M. J., McIntyre, J. M., et al. (2014) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036484 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Dehaene S (1997) The Number Sense (Oxford Univ Press, New York).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dimensions of Animal Consciousness
Birch, J., Schnell, A. K., & Clayton, N. S. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.007 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Self-citationSweet tooth: Elephants detect fruit sugar levels based on scent alone
Nevo, O., Schmitt, M. H., Ayasse, M., & Valenta, K. (2020) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.6777 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Plotnik, J. M., & Jacobson, S. L. (2022) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101148 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationCan Asian Elephants Use Water as a Tool in the Floating Object Task?
Barrett, L. P., & Benson-Amram, S. (2020) · Animal Behavior and Cognition · doi:10.26451/abc.07.03.04.2020 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“…Polla et al., 2018; odor and color classification: Bates et al., 2007; empathy: Plotnik & de Waal, 2014a; olfactory quantity discrimination: Plotnik et al., 2019; habituation: Goodyear & Schulte, 2015; cooperation: Plotnik et al., 2011; selfrecognition: Plotnik et al., 2006), but evidence…”
BackgroundSnyder, R. J., Barrett, L. P., Emory, R. A., & Perdue, B. M. (2021) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-021-01504-5 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Hope, S. F., Willgohs, K. R., Dittakul, S., & Plotnik, J. M. (2025) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/s13420-024-00655-y · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationSchmitt, M., Rudolph, M., Jacobson, S., & Plotnik, J. (2023) · doi:10.32942/x26w26 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Plotnik, J. M., Brubaker, D. L., Dale, R., Tiller, L. N., Mumby, H. S., & Clayton, N. S.
- Affiliations
- City University of New York (US)
- Think Elephants International, New York, NY 10017;
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2019-06-03
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 12566-12571
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC6591706
- OpenAlex
- W2948587458
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 15.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo
- Funders
- Earthwatch Institute
- Royal Society
- National Research Council of Thailand
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- elephants, numerical cognition, quantity discrimination, olfaction, object-choice task, ratio effect, comparative cognition, animal cognition
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Elephants, Female, Male, Odorants, Smell, Task Performance and Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review