The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review
Abstract
Social desirability is one of the most common sources of bias affecting the validity of experimental and survey research findings. From a self‐presentational perspective, social desirability can be regarded as the resultant of two separate factors: self‐deception and other‐deception. Two main modes of coping with social desirability bias are distinguished. The first mode comprises two methods aimed at the detection and measurement of social desirability bias: the use of social desirability scales, and the rating of item desirability. A second category comprises seven methods to prevent or reduce social desirability bias, including the use of forced‐choice items, the randomized response technique, the bogus pipeline, self‐administration of the questionnaire, the selection of interviewers, and the use of proxy subjects. Not one method was found to excel completely and under all conditions in coping with both other‐deceptive and self‐deceptive social desirability bias. A combination of prevention and detection methods offers the best choice available.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, F/BBT agents entirely refrain from demonstrating negative sentiments when they are distant from their acquaintances/neighbours to maintain a positive social image, similar to humans (Nederhof, 1985).”
From Humanoid Agents: Platform for Simulating Human-like Generative Agents (2023) · cites this paper as Nederhof, 1985
Citations
Cites
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047358 · Cited by 8,686
Two-component models of socially desirable responding.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598 · Cited by 3,013
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 103
- 10.1016/0092-6566(83)90062-4 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-322-88724-5 · DOI
- Barber T. X., 1976, Pitfalls in Human Research: Ten Pivotal Points
- 10.1037/0033-2909.91.1.3 · DOI
- Berg I. A., 1967, Response Set in Personality Assessment
- Blake B. F., 1971, Evaluation apprehension and subject bias in experiments, Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 5, 57
- Block J. M., 1965, The Challenge of Response Set: Unfounding Meaning, Acquiescence. and Social Desirability in the MMPI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.166 · DOI
- Bradburn N. M., 1979, Improving Interview Methods and Questionnaire Design
- 10.1086/268444 · DOI · Paper page
- Brigham J. C., 1974, Attitude measurement via the bogus pipeline: A dry well?, Representative Research in Social Psychology, 5, 97
- Campbell D. T., 1966, Experimental and Quasi‐Experimental Designs for Research
- Cohen J., 1975, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
- Cook T. D., 1979, Quasi‐Experimentation
- 10.1177/004912417600400305 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0023891 · DOI
- 10.1177/001316445001000101 · DOI
- Crowne D. P., 1964, The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence
- Dickensberger D., 1978, Bedürfnis nach sozialer anerkennung: validierung der Marlowe‐Crowne Social Desirability Scale über ein konzept individuell relevanter gruppen, Diagnostica, 24, 24
- Dillman D. A., 1978, Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method
- 10.1086/267676 · DOI
- 10.1086/267624 · DOI
- 10.1177/0049124182011001005 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0058073 · DOI
- Edwards A. L., 1957, The Social Desirability Variable in Personality and Assessment and Research
- Edwards A. L., 1970, The Measurement of Personality Traits by Scales and Inventories
- 10.1177/001316446202200307 · DOI
- 10.2307/255979 · DOI
- Goffman E., 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
- 10.1086/268250 · DOI
- 10.1086/226466 · DOI
- 10.2466/pr0.1970.27.1.131 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.37.2.147 · DOI
- Hermans H., 1967, Motivatie en Prestatie
- 10.1037/0022-3514.43.4.710 · DOI
- Humm D. G., 1939, The Humm‐Wadsworth Temperament Scale
- Hyman H. H., 1954, Interviewing in Social Research
- Jackson D. N., 1967, Personality Research Form Manual
- 10.1037/h0031617 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.85.3.555 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0076863 · DOI
- Kuder G. F., 1939, Preference Record
- Lana R. E., 1969, Artifact in Behavioral Research
- 10.1080/00223980.1976.9921389 · DOI
- Locander W., 1976, An investigation of interview methods, threat, and response distortion, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 269, 10.1080/01621459.1976.10480332 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.641 · DOI
- 10.2307/2987631 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.293 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-006X.51.6.882 · DOI
- McGuire W. J., 1969, Artifact in Behavioral Research
- 10.1037/h0053634 · DOI
- Messick S., 1968, Response sets’. In:, International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 13, 492
- 10.2307/2095089 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-6566(74)90028-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-6566(80)90003-3 · DOI
- Millham J., 1978, Dimensions of Personality
- Nederhof A. J., 1981, Beter Onderzoek. Bestrijding van Foutenbronnen in Sociaal‐Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- 10.1086/268770 · DOI
- 10.1080/00224545.1984.9713482 · DOI
- Nederhof A. J., 1985, Artifact in Social Science Research: Coping With Sources of Error in Data Collection
- 10.1002/ejsp.2420130305 · DOI
- Nunnally J. C., 1978, Psychometric Theory
- Orne M. T., 1973, Communication and Affect: Language and Thought
- 10.1037/h0033861 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-6566(81)90035-0 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.43.4.838 · DOI
- Phillips D. L., 1971, Knowledge from What?
- Phillips D. L., 1973, Abandoning Method
- 10.2307/2092992 · DOI
- 10.1086/225231 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.36.3.247 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327752jpa4405_11 · DOI
- 10.1080/00224545.1981.9711664 · DOI
- 10.1086/268267 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0021888 · DOI
- Rosenberg M. J., 1969, Artifact in Behavioral Research
- Rosenthal R., 1976, Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research
- Rosenthal R., 1969, Artifact in Behavioral Research
- Rosenthal R., 1975, The Volunteer Subject
- 10.1016/0022-1031(73)90009-7 · DOI
- Sackeim H. A., 1978, Consciousness and Self‐regulation. Advances in Research and Theory
- Sackeim H. A., 1979, Self‐deception, other‐deception, and self‐reported psychopathology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 213, 10.1037/0022-006X.47.1.213 · DOI
- Schuessler K. F., 1982, Measuring Social Life Feelings
- 10.2307/3033559 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0040089 · DOI
- Scott W. A., 1968, The Handbook of Social Psychology
- 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1974.tb00873.x · DOI
- 10.1037/h0030839 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.487 · DOI
- Stocking C., 1979, Improving Interview Methods and Questionnaire Design
- Strickland B. R., 1977, Personality Variables in Social Behavior
- Sudman S., 1974, Response Effects in Surveys
- 10.2307/2094978 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0032351 · DOI
- 10.1086/267650 · DOI
- Weiss C. H., 1969, Interviewer biasing effects: toward a reconciliation of findings, Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 127
- Weiss C. H.(1970). ‘Interaction in the research interview: the effects of rapport on response’. In: Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section American Statistical Association 17–20.
- 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60252-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0047823 · DOI
- 10.1086/267606 · DOI
- 10.1086/267762 · DOI
- 10.1086/267981 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,003
Battisti, L., Corsini, F., Gusmerotti, N., & Larcher, F. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11216169 · Cited by 16
“Nederhof [26] suggests guaranteeing anonymity for the respondents in order to reduce social desirability bias.”
BackgroundThe Adolescent Distress-Eustress Scale: Development and Validation:
Branson, V., Dry, M. J., Palmer, E., & Turnbull, D. (2019) · doi:10.25384/sage.c.4589105.v1 · Cited by 16
Ludwig, T., Priemer, B., & Lewalter, D. (2019) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-019-09862-4 · Cited by 16
“This approach may both alleviate the social desirability bias of an interview structure (Nederhof 1985; Richman et al. 1999) and elicit implicit justifications.”
BackgroundMutaganzwa, C., Wibecan, L., Iyer, H. S., Nahimana, E., Manzi, A., Biziyaremye, F., Nyishime, M., Nkikabahizi, F., Hirschhorn, L. R., & Magge, H. (2018) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzy103 · Cited by 21
Understanding Driving Behavior: Measurement, Modeling and Analysis
Elassad, Z. E. A., & Mousannif, H. (2018) · Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11928-7_41 · Cited by 16
Corsini, F., Rizzi, F., & Frey, M. (2018) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.01.002 · Cited by 16
Musoke, P. L., Hatcher, A. M., Rogers, A. J., Achiro, L., Bukusi, E. A., Darbes, L. A., Kwena, Z., Oyaro, P., Weke, E., & Turan, J. M. (2018) · Culture Health & Sexuality · doi:10.1080/13691058.2018.1426785 · Cited by 16
“Finally, because recruitment occurred at the health facilities, perceptions shared about male engagement may have been more favourably presented if participants were reluctant to express negative views to a researcher who seemed linked to the clinic (Nederhof 1985).”
BackgroundSleep habits in infants: the role of maternal education
Martins, R., Oliveira, J. A., Salgado, C., Marqués, B., Oliveira, L., Oliveira, G., Rodrigues, T. S., & Ferreira, R. (2018) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2018.08.020 · Cited by 17
Baird, H. M., Webb, T. L., Miller, J. G., & Sirois, F. M. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017000 · Cited by 23
Sedrak, A., Anpalahan, M., & Luetsch, K. (2017) · International Journal of Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/ijcp.12959 · Cited by 18
Extroverts tweet differently from introverts in Weibo
Zhou, Z., Xu, K., & Zhao, J. (2018) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0146-8 · Cited by 23
Kravtsova, M., Oshchepkov, A., & Welzel, C. (2016) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022116677579 · Cited by 26
“Group polarization is said to occur when group discussion enhances group members’ initial leanings, and this effect tends to be more pronounced if the group is formed by like-minded people (e.g., Myers & Bishop, 1970).”
BackgroundBoth Personal and Public: Measuring Interethnic Marriage Attitudes
Campbell, M. E., & Herman, M. R. (2015) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12145 · Cited by 16
Road pricing: How people perceive a hypothetical introduction. The case of Lyon
Pronello, C., & Rappazzo, V. (2014) · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.08.005 · Cited by 16
“Due to the Social Desirability Bias (Nederhof, 1985; Kreuter et al., 2008; King and Bruner, 2000; Fisher and Katz, 2000), people may give answers that do not correspond to their real opinions but which are more convenient and socially appreciated.”
Behavior Change After Adventure Education Courses
Rhodes, H., & Martin, A. J. (2014) · Journal of Experiential Education · doi:10.1177/1053825913503115 · Cited by 16
“Third, bias in answers due to social desirability (Nederhof, 1985) may be reduced both by anonymity, and because it was made very clear to participants and colleagues that the survey was designed to evaluate courses rather than participants (the high participation rate suggests this message was understood, because it…”
BackgroundMashuri, A., & Zaduqisti, E. (2014) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v10i2.707 · Cited by 12
“If found that social desirability scale correlates significantly with one or more measured variables, to cope with social desirability bias, then the effect of the social desirability must be controlled (Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundPublic Opinion and Policy‐making
Pawson, R., & Wong, G. (2013) · Social Policy and Administration · doi:10.1111/spol.12028 · Cited by 19
Abreu, J. M., & Gabarain, G. (2000) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.47.2.165 · Cited by 16
Moskowitz, J. M. (1989) · New Directions for Program Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.1528 · Cited by 16
Determining Whether a Patient is Feeling Better: Pitfalls from the Science of Human Perception
Redelmeier, D. A., & Dickinson, V. M. (2011) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1655-3 · Cited by 57
Evaluation of Risk-Based Re-Authentication Methods
Wiefling, S., Patil, T., Dürmuth, M., & Lo Iacono, L. (2020) · IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58201-2_19 · Cited by 15
“e participants registered on the study website with username and password. The website was reachable via HTTPS via an internet domain not linked to our university to mitigate social desirability bias [22]. After registering, the participants tried logging into the website. After submitting the correct login credential…”
Less Is More: Exploring the Role of Minimalism in Sustainable Consumption
Nguyen, K. H., Tran, M. D., & Adomako, S. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.70059 · Cited by 16
An Empirical Study on Package-Level Deprecation in Python Ecosystem
Zhong, Z., He, S., Wang, H., Yu, B.-X., Yang, H., & He, P.-J. (2024) · International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/icse55347.2025.00046 · Cited by 15
“The two surveys are also influenced by social desirability bias [57] and self-selection bias [58].”
Virtual reality stimulation and organizational neuroscience for the assessment of empathy
Parra, E., Delgado, A. G., Cervera‐Torres, S., Carrasco-Ribelles, L. A., Marín‐Morales, J., & Alcañíz, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.993162 · Cited by 17
“The assessments of organizational empathy have mainly relied on self-reports and questionnaires, which present limitations and biases (e.g., Nederhof, 1985; Furnham, 1986; Grimm, 2010).”
MethodTon, A. D., Hammerl, L., Weber, D., Kremer, O., & Szabó-Szentgróti, G. (2022) · Problems and Perspectives in Management · doi:10.21511/ppm.20(3).2022.15 · Cited by 12
“Social desirability is present when respondents prefer to give answers that they believe are more likely to meet with social approval than the true answer for which they fear social rejection (Nederhof, 1985).”
Translating entrepreneurial intention to behaviour amongst micro and small entrepreneurs
Nungsari, M., Ngu, K., Shi, D. W. N., Chin, J.-W., Chee, S.-Y., Wong, X.-S., & Flanders, S. (2022) · Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies · doi:10.1108/jeee-11-2021-0429 · Cited by 15
Jörling, M., Eitze, S., Schmid, P., Betsch, C., Allen, J., & BOHM, R. M. (2022) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2022.2050418 · Cited by 17
“Third, social desirability bias is a general issue to consider when conducting survey-based research on sensitive topics (Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundHow does practice matches land laws in Central Asia?
Akhmadiyeva, Z., & Herzfeld, T. (2021) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105726 · Cited by 15
Intercooperation, flexicurity and their impact on workers: The case of Fagor Electrodomésticos
Santos‐Larrazabal, J., & Basterretxea, I. (2021) · Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics · doi:10.1111/apce.12329 · Cited by 22
Got waste: knowledge, behavior and self-assessment on food waste of university students in Germany
Gabriel, A., Rombach, M., Wieser, H., & Bitsch, V. (2021) · The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review · doi:10.22434/ifamr2020.0145 · Cited by 18
Park, K., Kwak, H., Song, H., & Cha, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7321 · Cited by 8
“Notably, this paper is based on datadriven approaches and, hence, allows us to objectively measure the changes in community feedback without the risk of possible biases such as the social desirability bias (Nederhof 1985) that can arise in surveys or interview-based studies.”
MethodThe impact of modular design and innovation on new product performance
Sun, H., & Lau, A. (2019) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-09-2018-0319 · Cited by 15
Bersvendsen, H. S., Haugnes, H. S., Dahl, A. A., Fagerli, U., Fluge, Ø., Holte, H., Seland, M., Wilsgaard, T., Smeland, K. B., & Kiserud, C. E. (2019) · Bone Marrow Transplantation · doi:10.1038/s41409-019-0745-4 · Cited by 17
Huang, W.-L. (2019) · Chinese Public Administration Review · doi:10.22140/cpar.v10i1.190 · Cited by 15
“Although our analysis shows that the possible CMV bias may not notably distort our analysis results, future studies may consider preventing or reducing social desirability bias by using forced‐choice items or a randomized response technique (Nederhof, 1985).”
Wallace, G. P. R. (2019) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1017/lsi.2018.22 · Cited by 16
“A number of strategies for designing and implementing surveys have been proposed to mitigate social desirability bias, from self-administration of questionnaires to employing list experiments and other randomized response techniques (Nederhof 1985; Blair, Imai, and Lyall 2014).”
BackgroundUnderstanding Motivations behind Inaccurate Check-ins
Xu, F., Zhang, G., Chen, Z., Huang, J., Li, Y., Yang, D., Zhao, B. Y., & Meng, F. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274457 · Cited by 12
“Second, referring to the method of proxy subjects [30], we design additional questions that ask participant’s perception on the inaccurate check-ins of one of their typical friends, and examine their speculations on the underlying motivations.”
BackgroundMethodNottidge, T., & Louw, A. J. N. (2017) · African Journal of Health Professions Education · doi:10.7196/ajhpe.2017.v9i1.708 · Cited by 17
“10 above, and could have introduced a social desirability bias (Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundPechorro, P., Ayala-Nunes, L., Oliveira, J., Nunes, C., & Gonçalves, R. (2016) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.05.003 · Cited by 15
Diabetes nutrition therapy and dietary intake among individuals with Type 1 diabetes in China
Jaacks, L. M., Liu, W., Ji, L., Mendez, M. A., Du, S., Crandell, J., Rosamond, W. D., & Mayer‐Davis, E. J. (2014) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.12634 · Cited by 15
Understanding the Durability of a Fire Department Wellness Program
Mabry, L., Elliot, D. L., MacKinnon, D. P., Thoemmes, F. J., & Kuehl, K. S. (2013) · American Journal of Health Behavior · doi:10.5993/ajhb.37.5.13 · Cited by 16
Value orientations: a case study of north Indian manufacturing managers
Monga, M. (2005) · doi:10.1108/02621710510608768 · Cited by 15
Social desirability of personality items as a predictor of endorsement: a cross-cultural analysis.
Smith, Ş. T., Smith, K. D., & Seymour, K. J. (1993) · Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1993.9712117 · Cited by 15
Booth-Kewley, S., Rosenfeld, P., & Edwards, J. (1992) · doi:10.1080/00224545.1992.9924707 · Cited by 15
Warach, B., Bornstein, R. F., Gorman, B. S., & Moyer, A. E. (2024) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/pere.12571 · Cited by 21
Kim, G., Hwang, S., Seong, M., Yeo, D., Rus, D. L., & Kim, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3678544 · Cited by 16
Helinski, C., Englisch, C. L., Westmattelmann, D., & Schewe, G. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142267 · Cited by 17
Unraveling Mentors’ Positive and Negative Reactions to Protégés’ Taking Charge
Liu, X., Derfler-Rozin, R., Mao, J.-Y., Schaubroeck, J. M., & Zhou, Q.-W. (2024) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063231220892 · Cited by 14
“This approach has been recommended to reduce social desirability concerns (Nederhof, 1985) and used when measuring (un)ethical behaviors (e.g., West & Fleischman, 2022).”
“I'll take the easiest option please”. Carbon reduction preferences of the public
Brock, A., Williams, I. D., & Kemp, S. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139398 · Cited by 15
“There are several possibilities for why this may occur, there may be a degree of social desirability bias where participants feel because the survey concerns environmental issues and climate change they should show higher ‘green ’ preferences (Nederhof, 1985).”
E.Hawdon, J., Reichelmann, A. V., Costello, M., Llorent, V. J., Räsänen, P., Zych, I., Oksanen, A., & Blaya, C. (2023) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393231211270 · Cited by 17
“Social desirability bias occurs when respondents deny undesirable traits or involvement in anti-social behaviors and instead claim socially desirable traits or involvement in pro-social behaviors (Averdijk & Elffers, 2012; Furnham, 1986; Nederhof, 1985; Van de Mortel, 2008).”
BackgroundKeil, J., Weißmann, M., Korte, A., Edler, D., & Dickmann, F. (2023) · KN - Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information · doi:10.1007/s42489-023-00137-7 · Cited by 14
“Firstly, implicit measures are not susceptible to the social desirability bias (participants giving responses that makes them look good to others, cf. Jo 2000; Nederhof 1985) and are less likely to produce an observer expectancy bias (e.”
BackgroundPolice officers’ support for corruption: examining the impact of police culture
Amagnya, M. A. (2022) · Policing: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/pijpsm-06-2022-0085 · Cited by 14
Jain, N. K., Choudhary, P., Panda, A., Jain, S., & Dey, P. (2022) · International Journal of Energy Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijesm-01-2022-0019 · Cited by 14
Alif, M., & Nastiti, T. (2022) · Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business · doi:10.22146/gamaijb.61306 · Cited by 14
“The bias that occurred when filling out the questionnaire could reduce the measurement quality (validity and reliability) of the statistical results (Nederhof, 1985). b. Response bias as threat dishonesty of the respondents in providing information "to respond to the good and hide the bad"…”
BackgroundGarnelo‐Gomez, I., Money, K. G., & Littlewood, D. C. (2022) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-03-2020-0226 · Cited by 20
AI-enabled persuasive personal health assistant
Donadello, I., & Dragoni, M. (2022) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-022-00935-3 · Cited by 11
“To cope with it is not easy, and a combination of detection and prevention methods is the best solution (Nederhof 1985).”
BackgroundBello-Bravo, J., Medendorp, J., & Pittendrigh, B. (2022) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09808 · Cited by 14
“Response biases in research exemplify cases of this (Wetzel et al., 2016), e.g., when researchers seek honest assessments of training programs or innovations from participants and (real or perceived) power dynamics in the situation inhibit accurate responses (Jann et al., 2019; Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundPalou, R. G., Prat, G., Romeu‐Labayen, M., & Tort‐Nasarre, G. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19063213 · Cited by 15
“This is how the tendency towards social desirability is forged [28,29].”
BackgroundKrüger, A. (2021) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2021.39 · Cited by 17
Werle, D., & Byrd, C. T. (2021) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2021_lshss-21-00069 · Cited by 14
Pandemic Politics in the United States: COVID‐19 as a New Type of Political Emergency
Sommer, U., & Rappel‐Kroyzer, O. (2021) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12792 · Cited by 17
Marshal, M., Niranjan, V. R., Spain, E., MacDonagh, J., O’Doherty, J., O'Connor, R., & O’Regan, A. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047991 · Cited by 22
“…of the participants, which, on one hand, may exaggerate the propensity of participants to give socially desirable answers in the context of behaviour—a phenomenon known as social desirability bias 39 ; on the other hand, it may produce richer data due to the easy establishment of rapport and trust.”
Xu, X., Chew, K. A., Xu, X., Wu, Z.-H., Xiao, X.-H., & Yang, Q. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041453 · Cited by 14
Davies, F., Wood, F., Bullock, A. D., Wallace, C. A., & Edwards, A. (2020) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13071 · Cited by 16
“The evaluation of outcomes was limited to self-reported data and social desirability bias may have led to a tendency to positively evaluate the training and its impact on their clinical practice(52).”
BackgroundExamining tourist preferences to slow glacier loss: evidence from Alaska
Naald, B. V. (2020) · Tourism Recreation Resarch · doi:10.1080/02508281.2019.1606978 · Cited by 14
“First, WTP values are likely inflated due to the social desirability bias, which is the tendency of respondents in hypothetical studies to engage in pro-social behaviour by choosing the ‘correct’ answer (Dolnicar & Grün, 2013; Fisher, 1993; King & Bruner, 2000; Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundStepenuck, K. F., & Genskow, K. D. (2018) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1511022 · Cited by 17
“helped minimize social desirability bias (Nederhof 1985) and common method bias”
BackgroundMethodBenefits for coteachers of students with disabilities: Do contextual factors matter?
Stefanidis, A., King‐Sears, M. E., & Brawand, A. (2018) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22207 · Cited by 18
Direct Training to Increase Agreement Between Teachers’ and Observers’ Treatment Integrity Ratings
Fallon, L. M., Sanetti, L. M. H., Chafouleas, S. M., Faggella-Luby, M., & Briesch, A. (2018) · Assessment for Effective Intervention · doi:10.1177/1534508417738721 · Cited by 14
“Researchers have proposed ways to address the potential for socially desirable responding (e.g., create measures with forcedchoice responding, administer social desirability scales to detect such responding a priori; Nederhof, 1985); however studies of these methods have not yet extended to schools and teachers’ self-…”
BackgroundDelen, D., Moscato, G. F., & Toma, I. L. (2018) · International Conference on Information Management and Processing (ICIMP) · doi:10.1109/icimp1.2018.8325840 · Cited by 19
“One potentially important threat affecting the validity of experimental social science research findings is social desirability bias [43].”
BackgroundGender and Policing Norms: Evidence from Survey Experiments among Police Officers in Uganda
Wagner, N., Rieger, M., Bedi, A., & Hout, W. (2017) · Journal of African Economies · doi:10.1093/jae/ejx014 · Cited by 14
Shelef, N. G., & Zeira, Y. (2017) · doi:10.1177/0022002715595865 · Cited by 14
Yoon, J., & Lee, S. (2016) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0882-614520160000033004 · Cited by 14
Environmental literacy in Madeira Island (Portugal): The influence of demographic variables
Spínola, H. (2016) · International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.18497/iejee-green.52941 · Cited by 14
“A special care was taken to overcome potential social desirability bias that could overcome in self-reported assessments (Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundStevens, C. D., Tan, L., & Grace, R. C. (2015) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2015.1120868 · Cited by 15
“denying those that are socially undesirable (Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundEvaluating the Effectiveness of Website Content Features Using Retrospective Pretest Methodology
Mueller, C. (2015) · Evaluation review · doi:10.1177/0193841x15582142 · Cited by 14
“Nevertheless, in order to deal with this issue appropriately, researchers should try to detect bias by using social desirability scales or apply methods capable of preventing social desirability bias (Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundHypermarkets in Oman: a study of consumers’ shopping preferences
Belwal, R., & Belwal, S. (2014) · doi:10.1108/ijrdm-02-2013-0043 · Cited by 14
“A similar trend has been observed in Egypt by Ramzy et al. (2011) regarding the growth of large supermarkets and the loss of domination by small retailers and where low-income residents are visiting the larger stores to benefit from the store’s economies of scale.”
BackgroundMethodIngram, M. E., John, J. S. S., Applewhaite, T., Gaskin, P., Springer, K., & Indar, L. (2013) · Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition · doi:10.3329/jhpn.v31i4.2311 · Cited by 14
“The findings of this study should be interpreted in light of the following limitations: the literature shows that retrospective studies of self-reported acute gastrointestinal illness can be subject to recall bias and an overestimation of prevalence (24,30,31).”
BackgroundGenetic Influences on Implicit Measures of Personality
Osinsky, R., Alexander, N., Schmitz, A., Kuepper, Y., Müller, E. A., Beer, L., Koeppe, L., & Hennig, J. (2010) · Journal of Individual Differences · doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000007 · Cited by 11
“For instance, self-reports merely deliver information that is introspectively accessible (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977), and because people have reflective access to the information they give in such measures, conscious response strategies are a serious threat to validity (Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundGraham, S., Irving, J., Cano, I., & Edwards, M. (2018) · Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07347324.2018.1500873 · Cited by 13
“First, although much of the content of recovery websites is heterogeneous (e.g., National Institute on Drug Abuse, SAMSHA), the key benefits are flexibility and ease of access for busy people.”
InfluentialSpeaking ‘Tinglish’: a bridge or barrier?
Boonsuk, Y. (2025) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2025.2556932 · Cited by 13
“This dynamic presents the possibility of response bias or social desirability bias (Bergen & Labonté, 2020; Fisher, 1993; nederhof, 1985; Piedmont and (pp, 2024).”
Using semantic similarity to measure the echo of strategic communications
Cann, T. J. B., Dennes, B., Coan, T. G., O'Neill, S., & Williams, H. T. P. (2025) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-025-00538-w · Cited by 13
“Despite this, the impact of survey effects (and in particular social desirability bias in polarised contexts [19]) mean that scholarly efforts would be enhanced by tools to study message effectiveness in real-world settings.”
Lee, J.-C., & Chen, C. (2023) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107337 · Cited by 13
Valtorta, R., & Monaci, M. (2023) · Europe's Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.5549 · Cited by 13
“However, it should be noted that our measure assessed this association using a self-report scale, which may have been affected by the participants’ desirabili ty concerns (e.g., Crowne & Marlowe, 1964; Nederhof, 1985).”
MethodAppling, S., Bruckman, A., & de Choudhury, M. (2022) · Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. · doi:10.1145/3555128 · Cited by 13
“It’s important to note that the answers of all of our subjects likely exhibited social desirability bias to varying degrees [31].”
BackgroundWolf, S., Holm, S. E., Ingwersen, T., Bartling, C., Bender, G., Birke, G., Meyer, A., Nolte, A., Ottes, K., Pade, O., et al. (2022) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.1080/07853890.2022.2059557 · Cited by 15
Lin, J. A., Im, C., O’Sullivan, P., Kirkwood, K. S., & Cook, A. C. (2021) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.09.013 · Cited by 16
Multiple-Instance Learning from Similar and Dissimilar Bags
Feng, L., Shu, S.-L., Cao, Y.-Z., Tao, L., Wei, H., Xiang, T., An, B., & Niu, G. (2021) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467318 · Cited by 13
“However, it could be difficult to collect such fully labeled data, due to high labeling costs [54], privacy considerations [45], and social bias [36].”
BackgroundRetail inventory shrinkage, sensing weak security breach signals, and organizational structure
Su, H., Rungtusanatham, M. J., & Linderman, K. (2021) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/deci.12524 · Cited by 19
An Immersive Serious Game for the Behavioral Assessment of Psychological Needs
Giglioli, I. A. C., Carrasco-Ribelles, L. A., Parra, E., Marín‐Morales, J., & Alcañíz, M. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11041971 · Cited by 18
“Finally, they are also presenting biases, such as the social desirability bias that is the tendency of self-reported respondents to answer questions in accordance with socially favorable norms to maintain a socially favorable self-presentation, affecting responses veracity [33,34].”
BackgroundFaking self-reports of health behavior: a comparison between a within- and a between-subjects design
Egele, V. S., Kiefer, L. H., & Stark, R. (2021) · Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1080/21642850.2021.1991803 · Cited by 14
“…documented that people sometimes alter their responses to benefit from the creation of the desired impression (Crowne & Marlowe, 1960; Edwards, 1957; Furnham, 1986; Locander, Sudman, & Bradburn, 1976; Mazar & Ariely., 2006; McCrae & Costa, 1983; Mensch & Kandel, 1988; Nederhof, 1985; Norman, 1967).”
BackgroundShades of silence: Why subsidiary managers remain silent vis-à-vis their headquarters
Sarabi, A. (2020) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101147 · Cited by 16
Laroche, G., Domon, G., & Olivier, A. (2020) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-020-00837-3 · Cited by 18
“Residents were asked to give their email addresses to receive the online survey link, leaving them free to participate and limiting the desirability bias associated with face-to-face questionnaire (Nederhof 1985).”
BackgroundWang, H., Hall, N. C., Chiu, M. M., Goetz, T., & Gogol, K. (2020) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/emip.12353 · Cited by 14
The right to the virtual city: Rural retreatism in open-world video games
Denham, J., & Spokes, M. (2020) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820917114 · Cited by 13
A reporting guideline for IS survey research
Hui, W., Siu, M.-L., & Lau, W.-K. (2019) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2019.113136 · Cited by 13
Bersvendsen, H. S., Haugnes, H. S., Fagerli, U., Fluge, Ø., Holte, H., Smeland, K. B., Wilsgaard, T., & Kiserud, C. E. (2019) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/0284186x.2018.1558370 · Cited by 17
“At surveys, people tend to present a favorable image of themselves, and the finding of only 5% reporting an unhealthy alcohol consumption might be underestimated due to this social desirability bias in selfreports [31].”
BackgroundHui, C., Wong, A. K., Leung, W., Lee, E., Chan, S., Chang, W., Chen, E., Chan, T. C., Swapna, V., Tagata, H., et al. (2018) · Early Intervention in Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/eip.12765 · Cited by 13
“Furthermore, self-report questionnaire responses may be subject to biases like the social desirability bias (Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundLittlewood, K., Beausoleil, N., Stafford, K., Stephens, C., Collins, T., Fawcett, A., Hazel, S., Lloyd, J. K. F., Mallia, C., Richards, L., et al. (2018) · The Veterinary Record · doi:10.1136/vr.104775 · Cited by 13
Instruction-prompted objective behaviors as proxy for subjective measures in a driving simulator
Lee, Y.-C., & LaVoie, N. (2018) · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.03.002 · Cited by 13
“Self-reports can also be biased because some participants might engage in socially desirable responding (SDR), that is, a tendency to give answers that make the respondent look good (Nederhof, 1985; Paulhus & Reid, 1991).”
BackgroundShin, Y., Koo, M., & Park, D. (2018) · Korean Journal of Child Studies · doi:10.5723/kjcs.2018.39.2.15 · Cited by 12
McCartan, R., Elliott, M. A., Pagani, S., Finnegan, E., & Kelly, S. W. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12255 · Cited by 15
“All attitude items were presented in a pseudo-random order,with the response scales reversed for half the items to reduce response set bias (e.g., Nederhof, 1985).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Nederhof, A. J.
- Corresponding author
- Nederhof, Anton J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-280
- ISSN
- 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0992
- OpenAlex
- W2046622454
- Cited by
- 2,340
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 218 · 2024: 182 · 2023: 188 · 2022: 175 · 2021: 186 · 2020: 162 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 134 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 114 · 2014: 97 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 60
- FWCI
- 21.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Keywords
- social desirability bias, self-presentation, self-deception, Social Desirability Scale, randomized response, bogus pipeline, self-administered questionnaire, bias detection, bias prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review