The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review
Abstract
Social desirability is one of the most common sources of bias affecting the validity of experimental and survey research findings. From a self‐presentational perspective, social desirability can be regarded as the resultant of two separate factors: self‐deception and other‐deception. Two main modes of coping with social desirability bias are distinguished. The first mode comprises two methods aimed at the detection and measurement of social desirability bias: the use of social desirability scales, and the rating of item desirability. A second category comprises seven methods to prevent or reduce social desirability bias, including the use of forced‐choice items, the randomized response technique, the bogus pipeline, self‐administration of the questionnaire, the selection of interviewers, and the use of proxy subjects. Not one method was found to excel completely and under all conditions in coping with both other‐deceptive and self‐deceptive social desirability bias. A combination of prevention and detection methods offers the best choice available.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, F/BBT agents entirely refrain from demonstrating negative sentiments when they are distant from their acquaintances/neighbours to maintain a positive social image, similar to humans (Nederhof, 1985).”
From Humanoid Agents: Platform for Simulating Human-like Generative Agents (2023) · cites this paper as Nederhof, 1985
Citations
Cites
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047358 · Cited by 8,686
Two-component models of socially desirable responding.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598 · Cited by 3,013
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 103
- 10.1016/0092-6566(83)90062-4 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-322-88724-5 · DOI
- Barber T. X., 1976, Pitfalls in Human Research: Ten Pivotal Points
- 10.1037/0033-2909.91.1.3 · DOI
- Berg I. A., 1967, Response Set in Personality Assessment
- Blake B. F., 1971, Evaluation apprehension and subject bias in experiments, Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 5, 57
- Block J. M., 1965, The Challenge of Response Set: Unfounding Meaning, Acquiescence. and Social Desirability in the MMPI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.166 · DOI
- Bradburn N. M., 1979, Improving Interview Methods and Questionnaire Design
- 10.1086/268444 · DOI · Paper page
- Brigham J. C., 1974, Attitude measurement via the bogus pipeline: A dry well?, Representative Research in Social Psychology, 5, 97
- Campbell D. T., 1966, Experimental and Quasi‐Experimental Designs for Research
- Cohen J., 1975, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
- Cook T. D., 1979, Quasi‐Experimentation
- 10.1177/004912417600400305 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0023891 · DOI
- 10.1177/001316445001000101 · DOI
- Crowne D. P., 1964, The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence
- Dickensberger D., 1978, Bedürfnis nach sozialer anerkennung: validierung der Marlowe‐Crowne Social Desirability Scale über ein konzept individuell relevanter gruppen, Diagnostica, 24, 24
- Dillman D. A., 1978, Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method
- 10.1086/267676 · DOI
- 10.1086/267624 · DOI
- 10.1177/0049124182011001005 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0058073 · DOI
- Edwards A. L., 1957, The Social Desirability Variable in Personality and Assessment and Research
- Edwards A. L., 1970, The Measurement of Personality Traits by Scales and Inventories
- 10.1177/001316446202200307 · DOI
- 10.2307/255979 · DOI
- Goffman E., 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
- 10.1086/268250 · DOI
- 10.1086/226466 · DOI
- 10.2466/pr0.1970.27.1.131 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.37.2.147 · DOI
- Hermans H., 1967, Motivatie en Prestatie
- 10.1037/0022-3514.43.4.710 · DOI
- Humm D. G., 1939, The Humm‐Wadsworth Temperament Scale
- Hyman H. H., 1954, Interviewing in Social Research
- Jackson D. N., 1967, Personality Research Form Manual
- 10.1037/h0031617 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.85.3.555 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0076863 · DOI
- Kuder G. F., 1939, Preference Record
- Lana R. E., 1969, Artifact in Behavioral Research
- 10.1080/00223980.1976.9921389 · DOI
- Locander W., 1976, An investigation of interview methods, threat, and response distortion, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 269, 10.1080/01621459.1976.10480332 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.641 · DOI
- 10.2307/2987631 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.293 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-006X.51.6.882 · DOI
- McGuire W. J., 1969, Artifact in Behavioral Research
- 10.1037/h0053634 · DOI
- Messick S., 1968, Response sets’. In:, International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 13, 492
- 10.2307/2095089 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-6566(74)90028-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-6566(80)90003-3 · DOI
- Millham J., 1978, Dimensions of Personality
- Nederhof A. J., 1981, Beter Onderzoek. Bestrijding van Foutenbronnen in Sociaal‐Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- 10.1086/268770 · DOI
- 10.1080/00224545.1984.9713482 · DOI
- Nederhof A. J., 1985, Artifact in Social Science Research: Coping With Sources of Error in Data Collection
- 10.1002/ejsp.2420130305 · DOI
- Nunnally J. C., 1978, Psychometric Theory
- Orne M. T., 1973, Communication and Affect: Language and Thought
- 10.1037/h0033861 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-6566(81)90035-0 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.43.4.838 · DOI
- Phillips D. L., 1971, Knowledge from What?
- Phillips D. L., 1973, Abandoning Method
- 10.2307/2092992 · DOI
- 10.1086/225231 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.36.3.247 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327752jpa4405_11 · DOI
- 10.1080/00224545.1981.9711664 · DOI
- 10.1086/268267 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0021888 · DOI
- Rosenberg M. J., 1969, Artifact in Behavioral Research
- Rosenthal R., 1976, Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research
- Rosenthal R., 1969, Artifact in Behavioral Research
- Rosenthal R., 1975, The Volunteer Subject
- 10.1016/0022-1031(73)90009-7 · DOI
- Sackeim H. A., 1978, Consciousness and Self‐regulation. Advances in Research and Theory
- Sackeim H. A., 1979, Self‐deception, other‐deception, and self‐reported psychopathology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 213, 10.1037/0022-006X.47.1.213 · DOI
- Schuessler K. F., 1982, Measuring Social Life Feelings
- 10.2307/3033559 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0040089 · DOI
- Scott W. A., 1968, The Handbook of Social Psychology
- 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1974.tb00873.x · DOI
- 10.1037/h0030839 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.487 · DOI
- Stocking C., 1979, Improving Interview Methods and Questionnaire Design
- Strickland B. R., 1977, Personality Variables in Social Behavior
- Sudman S., 1974, Response Effects in Surveys
- 10.2307/2094978 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0032351 · DOI
- 10.1086/267650 · DOI
- Weiss C. H., 1969, Interviewer biasing effects: toward a reconciliation of findings, Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 127
- Weiss C. H.(1970). ‘Interaction in the research interview: the effects of rapport on response’. In: Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section American Statistical Association 17–20.
- 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60252-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0047823 · DOI
- 10.1086/267606 · DOI
- 10.1086/267762 · DOI
- 10.1086/267981 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,003
Ostapczuk, M., Joseph, R., Pufal, J., & Musch, J. (2017) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.12.003 · Cited by 26
Beehler, G. P., Funderburk, J. S., King, P. R., Wade, M. J., & Possemato, K. (2015) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-015-0325-0 · Cited by 18
“Limitations to this study include a potential for PCMHI providers to over-report their behaviors on the PPAQ in order to appear highly adherent due to social desirability bias [34], despite the anonymity of our survey approach.”
BackgroundMaiga, A. S., Nilsson, A., & Jacobs, F. A. (2014) · Journal of Management Control · doi:10.1007/s00187-014-0191-9 · Cited by 24
“Social desirability bias, which means the tendency of respondents to fill in questionnaires in a manner that is viewed favorably by others, would affect the validity of using questionnaires as a research method (Nederhof 1985).”
BackgroundCan participatory emissions budgeting help local authorities to tackle climate change?
Cohen, T. (2012) · Environmental Development · doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2012.03.016 · Cited by 20
Wilson, K., Spink, K., & Priebe, C. S. (2010) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.01.003 · Cited by 20
Social Desirability, Psychological Symptoms, and Perceived Health in Burn Injured Patients
Willebrand, M., Wikehult, B., & Ekselius, L. (2005) · Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000188976.84146.c3 · Cited by 20
“The construct has evolved over time and has been used to indicate either 1) a characteristic of certain items or tests (“fake ability”) that should be corrected (Nederhof, 1985), or 2) an individual response set that is characterized by underreporting of negative aspects to obtain approval and acceptance from others (…”
BackgroundEffets du contexte d'évaluation sur les dimensions de la désirabilité sociale
Juhel, J., & Rouxel, G. (2005) · Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations · doi:10.1016/j.pto.2005.02.006 · Cited by 20
López, S., Smith, A., Wolkenstein, B., & Charlin, V. (1993) · doi:10.1007/bf00289746 · Cited by 20
“Psychologists were given the following definition of social desirability: responding in a manner which "leaves a favorable impression on you the respondent, upon the person who reads the response(s)" ( Nederhof, 1985 ).”
BackgroundRusznyak, L., & Walton, E. (2017) · International Journal of Disability, Development and Education · doi:10.1080/1034912x.2016.1267333 · Cited by 20
Feeling Loved: A novel brief self-report health measure
Barrett, B., Muller, D., Hayer, S., Ewers, T., Chase, J., Barnet, J. H., & Brown, R. (2019) · EXPLORE · doi:10.1016/j.explore.2018.07.005 · Cited by 19
“Virtually all significant associations were with other self-report instruments, prone to a variety of potential biases, such as social desirability, or the effect of transient mood.(79,80) The Feeling Loved questionnaire assesses only two of several domains that could be considered to be within the dominion of love, a…”
Comparing In-Person, Sona, and Mechanical Turk Measurements of Three Prejudice-Relevant Constructs
Gamblin, B. W., Winslow, M. P., Lindsay, B., Newsom, A. W., & Kehn, A. (2017) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-015-9403-1 · Cited by 19
“To address issues of social desirability bias, researchers may account for the effects of social desirability using items or scales created to measure an individual’s level of social desir ability (Nederhof 1985).”
MethodUniversity Students’ Privacy Concerns Towards Generative Artificial Intelligence
Wang, N., Li, Y., & Cong, F. (2025) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-025-09658-4 · Cited by 18
“, a technique proven to reduce social desirability bias (Nederhof, 1985).”
Zaman, T., Shazad, U., & Yadav, V. K. (2023) · Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1016/j.cam.2023.115645 · Cited by 19
Frietze, G. A., Padilla, M. E., Cordero, J. I., Gosselink, K. L., & Moya, E. M. (2023) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-023-16628-1 · Cited by 26
Lee, J.-C., & Xiong, L. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11884-5 · Cited by 21
“These practices encouraged the respondents to fill out the questionnaire honestly (Nederhof, 1985; Lee et al., 2021a, b).”
BackgroundWeigel, C., Derfuss, K., & Hiebl, M. (2022) · Reviews of Management Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11846-022-00534-8 · Cited by 19
“Fourth, we employed constructs that are not very likely to give the respondents a reason to believe that some answers are more desirable than others (Nederhof 1985).”
MethodBallo, L., Arheiam, A., & Marhazlinda, J. (2021) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-021-01681-2 · Cited by 26
“Although selfreported data must be interpreted with caution because of the potential social desirability bias [41], irregular tooth brushing and reduced consumption of sugars are highly expected observations in a setting of political crisis and civil wars [21, 25, 42].”
Backgroundvan Velden, J. L., Travers, H., Moyo, B., & Biggs, D. (2020) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108676 · Cited by 19
Pakravan, M. H., & MacCarty, N. A. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13113021 · Cited by 18
“Detailed discussion on how to remedy for these two biases are presented by [68,69].”
BackgroundRadio Journalism and Women's Empowerment in Niger
Heywood, E. (2020) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2020.1745668 · Cited by 19
“Whilst focus groups have their advantages, it was necessary to consider social desirability bias, or the ‘tendency to say things which place the speaker in a favourable light’ (Nederhof 1985: 264).”
BackgroundKratka, A., Ubel, P., Scherr, K. A., Murray, B., Eyal, N., Kirby, C., Katz, M. N., Holtzman, L. G., Pollak, K., Freedburg, K., et al. (2019) · Ethics & Human Research · doi:10.1002/eahr.500035 · Cited by 19
Michael, M., Areepattamannil, S., Menano, L., & Fildago, P. (2019) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-019-09506-5 · Cited by 21
“Although self-report measures are widely used in social and behavioral science research, they have been criticized for social desirability bias and acquiescence bias (see Nederhof 1985).”
BackgroundPay Attention, Please: Formal Language Improves Attention in Volunteer and Paid Online Experiments
August, T., & Reinecke, K. (2019) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300478 · Cited by 19
The impact of a leader’s demographic and professional characteristics on employee motivation
Campos‐García, I., & Vicente, J. (2018) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-10-2017-0253 · Cited by 23
Random responses inflate statistical estimates in heavily skewed addictions data
King, K. M., Kim, D. S., & McCabe, C. J. (2017) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.10.033 · Cited by 24
“Efforts to detect intentional distortions in substance use survey research have ranged from directly measuring participants’ social desirability (Nederhof, 1985), using external stimuli to promote truthful responding, such as the bogus pipeline technique (Roese and Jamieson, 1993), or including…”
BackgroundRecovery Camp: Assisting consumers toward enhanced self‐determination
Taylor, E. K., Perlman, D., Moxham, L. J., Pegg, S., Patterson, C., Brighton, R. M., Sumskis, S., & Heffernan, T. (2016) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.12227 · Cited by 21
MOTIVATION ORIENTATIONS IN INNOVATION CONTESTS: WHY PEOPLE PARTICIPATE
Pellizzoni, E., Buganza, T., & Colombo, G. (2015) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919615500334 · Cited by 18
“In this case it lead to discover that the non-solvers are influenced by the social desirability bias: non-participants define intrinsic motivations that are considered socially acceptable, to project a favourable image of themselves to others (Maccoby and Maccoby, 1954; Crowne and Marlowe, 1964; Thomas and Kilmann, 19…”
BackgroundHind, D., Mountain, G. A., Gossage-Worrall, R., Walters, S. J., Duncan, R., Newbould, L., Rex, S., Jones, C., Bowling, A., Cattan, M., et al. (2014) · Public Health Research · doi:10.3310/phr02070 · Cited by 22
Social support, hopelessness and life satisfaction among Roma and non-Roma adolescents in Slovakia
Kolarčik, P., Gecková, A., Reijneveld, S., & van Dijk, J. V. (2012) · International Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s00038-012-0413-6 · Cited by 19
“Social desirability reflects the tendency on behalf of the subjects to deny socially undesirable traits and to claim socially desirable ones, and the tendency to say things which place the speaker in a favourable light (Nederhof 1985).”
BackgroundSocial Desirability and Environmental Valuation
Börger, T. (2012) · Peter Lang D eBooks · doi:10.3726/978-3-653-01583-6 · Cited by 23
“At this point it becomes clear already that when both the individual disposition of the respondent and the specific item content potentially trigger SDR, a possible measure or control instrument for SDR must incorporate both sources (Nederhof 1985).”
BackgroundObrusnikova, I., Dillon, S., & Block, M. E. (2011) · Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities · doi:10.1007/s10882-010-9210-4 · Cited by 19
“The open-ended questionnaire was selected over interviews to minimize effects of social desirability bias ( Nederhof 1985 ).”
BackgroundCotton farmers’ willingness to pay for pest management services in northern Benin
Kpadé, C. P., Mensah, E., Fok, M., & Ndjeunga, J. (2017) · doi:10.1111/agec.12298 · Cited by 19
“However, social desirability bias may occur when administering the questionnaire and conducting the survey (Nederhof, 1985; van de Mortel, 2008).”
BackgroundCiasullo, M. V., Ferrara, M., & Lim, W. M. (2025) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-02-2025-0119 · Cited by 26
When employees feel envy: The role of psychological capital
Lee, C., Song, J., & Ryan, B. (2022) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103251 · Cited by 16
Muir, K. J., Keim‐Malpass, J., & LeBaron, V. T. (2022) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100111 · Cited by 17
Jensen, N., Lund, C., & Abrahams, Z. (2022) · Global Health Research and Policy · doi:10.1186/s41256-022-00242-6 · Cited by 29
“Lastly, as the ERI and PROQOL questionnaires rely on self-reported data, there is also the risk of reporting biases due to social desirability or affectivity [33], although this was mitigated by the fact that questionnaires were anonymous and self-administered [76].”
BackgroundXue, J., Mo, Z., Liu, M. T., & Gao, M. (2021) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights · doi:10.1108/jhti-07-2021-0160 · Cited by 21
Hu, J.-Y., & Cheung, C. (2021) · Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica · doi:10.1186/s41155-021-00199-4 · Cited by 18
“Anyhow, self-report measures are at risk of subjective bias (Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundGreggio, N., Serafini, A., Balugani, E., Carlini, C., Contin, A., & Marazza, D. (2021) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.010 · Cited by 24
Wynes, S., Kotcher, J., & Donner, S. D. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03215-9 · Cited by 29
“Surveys of legislators can instead be used to elicit the legislator’s opinions on what they believe is effective in changing their political decisions (Cluverius, 2017; Hooghe and Marien, 2012), but results from these investigations may be subject to social desirability bias (Nederhof, 1985).”
Coopetition in social entrepreneurship: a strategy for social value devolution
Nascimento, L. D. S., da Costa, J. D., Salazar, V. S., & Chim-Miki, A. F. (2021) · International Journal of Emerging Markets · doi:10.1108/ijoem-09-2020-1062 · Cited by 18
Farooq, M., & Yahya, S. (2021) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-021-01358-8 · Cited by 17
“Nederhof (1985) describes socially desirable responses (SDR) as a trend of respondents to participate in the survey such that respondents may compromise the validity of the questionnaire.”
BackgroundA less evaluative measure of Big Five personality: Comparison of structure and criterion validity
Wood, J. K., Anglim, J., & Horwood, S. (2021) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070211012920 · Cited by 21
“Similarly, debates about whether agreement with socially desirable items reflects substance or bias can be seen in multiple personality literatures including discussion of impression management scales (de Vries et al., 2014; Nederhof, 1985; Paulhus, 1984; Uziel, 2010), personality modeling (Anglim et al.”
BackgroundInvestigating User Emotional Responses to Eco-Feedback Designs
Bao, Q., Burnell, E., Hughes, A. M., & Yang, M. C. (2018) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4042007 · Cited by 18
Chatters, R., Roberts, J., Mountain, G., Cook, S., Windle, G., Craig, C., & Sprange, K. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016711 · Cited by 18
Wang, J., Wang, Q., Wimalaratne, I., Menkes, D. B., & Wang, X. (2017) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2521-8 · Cited by 17
Why Should I Care? Exploring the Use of Environmental Concern as a Frame of Communication in Zoos
Yocco, V. S., Bruskotter, J. T., Wilson, R. S., & Heimlich, J. E. (2014) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.2014.973352 · Cited by 15
“The questionnaire packet was self-administered, with no identifiable information collected, reducing the likelihood of participants giving a socially desirable response (Nederhof, 1985; Salant & Dillman, 1994).”
BackgroundPatient Preferences for Change in Symptoms Associated with Opioid-Induced Constipation
Epstein, R., Çimen, A., Benenson, H., Aubert, R., Khalid, M., Sostek, M., & Salimi, T. (2014) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-014-0169-x · Cited by 18
“Prior research with intervieweradministrated questionnaires, as opposed to our anonymized online survey, may result in social desirability response bias [15], where the respondent seeks to please the interviewer and not provide responses that are counter to the interviewer’s desire.”
BackgroundAccountants' construction of CSR competencies and commitment
Caron, M.-A., & Fortin, A. (2014) · doi:10.1108/sampj-03-2013-0013 · Cited by 18
Attracted but Unsatisfied: The Effects of Sensational Content on Television Consumption Choices
Stanca, L., Gui, M., & Gallucci, M. (2013) · Journal of Media Economics · doi:10.1080/08997764.2013.785552 · Cited by 18
“…to prevailing social norms and, more specifically, to answer questions in a manner that will be viewed favorably by others (King and Bruner, 2000; Nederhof, 1985). violence, broadly defined as “noxious symbolic messages containing criticism, insults, cursing, or a negative affective reaction”…”
BackgroundPryce, H., & Gooberman-Hill, R. (2013) · Hearing Balance and Communication · doi:10.3109/21695717.2012.756224 · Cited by 18
The Effect of Reversibility on a Manager's Decision to Record Asset Impairments
Trottier, K. (2013) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1840746 · Cited by 18
Wood, M. S., & Rowe, J. D. (2011) · Entrepreneurship Research Journal · doi:10.2202/2157-5665.1034 · Cited by 20
“Another potential limitation of our study is that surveys are susceptible to social desirability bias (Nederhof, 1985) and this bias may be especially strong in entrepreneurship where social consideration is paramount.”
BackgroundInfluentialModifications of the 7-Day Activity Interview for Use Among Older Adults
Hellman, E. A., Williams, M. A., & Thalken, L. J. (1996) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/073346489601500108 · Cited by 16
“Social desirability reflects the subject’s tendency to deny socially undesirable traits and to claim socially desirable ones (Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundSocial Factors Affecting the Completion of a Batterer Intervention Program
Cuevas, D. A., & Bui, N. H. (2015) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-015-9748-0 · Cited by 18
“Social desirability bias describes the tendency for participants to respond in a socially desirable manner rather than dictating to the interviewer what is actually the case (Nederhof 2006).”
BackgroundUnderstanding Data Quality in a Data-Driven Industry Context: Insights from the Fundamentals
Fu, Q., Nicholson, G. L., & Easton, J. M. (2024) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2024.100729 · Cited by 17
Xu, Y. D., Xie, P., Naeem, R. M., Almugren, I., Hameed, Z., & Agarwal, S. (2025) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124470 · Cited by 16
Privacy in Human-AI Romantic Relationships: Concerns, Boundaries, and Agency
Ma, R., He, S., Martín-Navarro, J. L., Ma, X. Z., & Such, J. M. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791237 · Cited by 10
“Second, our findings may be subject to social desirability bias [78].”
Identity Deepfake Threats to Biometric Authentication Systems: Public and Expert Perspectives
He, S.-J., Lei, Y., Zhang, Z., Sun, Y., Li, S., Zhang, C., & Ye, J. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.06825 · Cited by 17
“In addition, self-reported data inherently carries the risk of social desirability bias, where participants may have provided responses they believed were more acceptable rather than their genuine views [111].”
Validity and Transparency in Quantifying Open-Ended Data
Conry‐Murray, C., Waltzer, T., DeBernardi, F. C., Fossum, J. L., Haasova, S., Matthews, M. S., O’Mahony, A., Moreau, D., Baum, M. A., Karhulahti, V., et al. (2024) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459241275217 · Cited by 25
“When they are interviewed in settings with less privacy and researchers ask direct questions about sensitive issues, participants may be guarded in their responses (DeKeseredy et al., 2020; Grimm, 2010; Nederhof, 1985), or social-desirability effects may be increased (Fine & Elsbach, 2000).”
Sharma, S. (2024) · Journal of Global Marketing · doi:10.1080/08911762.2024.2375709 · Cited by 20
“To address the social desirability issue, the study participants were informed and assured about the survey’s confidentiality, anonymity, and academic nature (Nederhof, 1985).”
Reitinger, N., Wen, B., Mazurek, M. L., & Ur, B. (2024) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.56553/popets-2024-0101 · Cited by 17
Are eco-friendly hotels inconvenient? An Implicit Association Test
Tabatabaei, F., & Beldona, S. (2024) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2024.01.001 · Cited by 17
The Design and Use of Questionnaires in Educational Research: A New (Student) Researcher Guide
Holmes, A. G. D. (2023) · Innovare Journal of Education · doi:10.22159/ijoe.2023v11i3.47599 · Cited by 27
Reaching hard-to-reach communities: using WhatsApp to give conflict-affected audiences a voice
Heywood, E., Meuter, S., & Ivey, B. (2022) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2022.2117451 · Cited by 17
“Whilst beneficial in consulting a plurality of voices, FGDs present disadvantages such as the intersectional nature of the group’s composition (Merryweather, 2010), dominant voices driving conversations (Stokes & Bergin, 2006) and social desirability bias (Nederhof, 1985).”
Enterprise social media platforms for coping with an accelerated digital transformation
Jorge, L. F., Mosconi, E. P., & de Santa-Eulália, L. A. (2022) · Journal of Systems and Information Technology · doi:10.1108/jsit-08-2021-0154 · Cited by 19
Alighieri, C., Bettens, K., Vanoost, L., Demuynck, K., Verhaeghe, S. T. L., & Lierde, K. M. V. (2021) · International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology · doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110958 · Cited by 19
Entem, A., Lloyd-Smith, P., Adamowicz, W., & Boxall, P. (2021) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/ajae.12268 · Cited by 17
The Predictors of Screen Time at Two Years in a Large Nationally Diverse Cohort
Corkin, M. T., Peterson, E. R., Henderson, A. M. E., Bird, A. L., Waldie, K. E., Reese, E., & Morton, S. (2021) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-021-01985-5 · Cited by 25
“As with any study that gathers information primarily by self-report, there is the danger that respondents may provide socially desirable responses (Nederhof, 1985), and it is possible that this may have affected mothers’ report of how much time their child spent engaging with screens.”
BackgroundMueller, L. (2021) · Communication & Sport · doi:10.1177/21674795211019670 · Cited by 20
“As social scientists have long lamented, social desirability bias tends to disguise the genuine prevalence of socially sensitive attitudes, especially on matters of race (Blair et al., 2020; Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFostering student motivation towards community healthcare: a qualitative study
Yahata, S., Takeshima, T., Kenzaka, T., & Okayama, M. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039344 · Cited by 20
Critical methodological considerations for entrepreneurial cognition research
Narayanan, V., Zane, L. J., & Liguori, E. (2020) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1080/00472778.2020.1799634 · Cited by 17
“Social desirability bias is the tendency of respondents to answer questions in a manner that will be viewed favorably by others (Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundThompson, A. E., Moore, E. A., Haedtke, K., & Karst, A. T. (2020) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-020-01625-x · Cited by 22
Dahm, S. F., Bart, V. K., Pithan, J. M., & Rieger, M. (2019) · Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie · doi:10.1026/1612-5010/a000273 · Cited by 17
“Verzerrungen durch soziale Erwünschtheit haben auf Fragebögen einen stärkeren Einfluss als auf Tests (Nederhof, 1985).”
Engl, E., Kretschmer, S., Jain, M., Sharma, S., Prasad, R., Ramesh, B. M., Shetye, M., Tandon, S., Kumar, S., Wilson, T. B., et al. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214922 · Cited by 19
“…participants little time to deliberate, and it does not directly ask participants for their beliefs and motivations, but infers them from the choices participants make, thereby reducing social desirability bias (the tendency to select responses that show the participant in a good light [30]).”
Thinking Outside the ‘Murder Box’: Virtual Violence and Pro-social Action in Video Games
Denham, J., & Spokes, M. (2019) · British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azy067 · Cited by 17
Building a sponsor’s equity through brand personality: perceptions of fans and rivals
Tsordia, C., Papadimitriou, D. A., & Apostolopoulou, A. (2018) · Sport Business and Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/sbm-09-2017-0050 · Cited by 16
Structural power in Serbian anti-corruption forest policy network
Rogelja, T., & Shannon, M. (2017) · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.05.008 · Cited by 17
O'Brien, H. L., & McCay‐Peet, L. (2017) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3020165.3020167 · Cited by 13
Heard, M., Sutton, S. G., Rogers, P., & Huveneers, C. (2016) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.019 · Cited by 17
“Anglers response to belief statements may have been influenced by a desirability bias, where respondents answer inaccurately to represent themselves in the most socially correct or acceptable way [46].”
BackgroundJames, R. (2015) · Nonprofit Management and Leadership · doi:10.1002/nml.21141 · Cited by 17
Human values and non‐adherence to doctors' instructions across Europe
Ahola, S. (2015) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12289 · Cited by 17
Pidd, K., Roche, A., & Fischer, J. (2015) · Drugs Education Prevention and Policy · doi:10.3109/09687637.2015.1016400 · Cited by 17
“Finally, as changes in behaviour were assessed by self-report, social desirability bias (Nederhof, 1985) may have played a role, especially for self-reports of non-validated measures of improved communication and coping skills.”
BackgroundMethodPerception of children’s faces with unilateral coronal synostosis—an eye-tracking investigation
Linz, C., Gerdes, A. B. M., Meyer-Marcotty, P., Müller-Richter, U., Böhm, H., Ernestus, R., Kübler, A., Alpers, G., & Schweitzer, T. (2015) · Child's Nervous System · doi:10.1007/s00381-015-2798-z · Cited by 17
Development and validation of the Agents’ Socially Desirable Responding (ASDR) scale
Manning, K., Bearden, W., & Tian, K. (2009) · doi:10.1007/s11002-008-9041-6 · Cited by 17
“Socially desirable responding is a common response bias that reflects tendencies to provide favorable responses with respect to norms and standards ( Nederhof 1985 ).”
BackgroundItem level correction: detecting, removing, and reporting common methods variance
Merkle, A. C. (2025) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-025-00399-2 · Cited by 17
A Functional Model of Social Loafing: When and How Does Social Loafing Enhance Job Performance?
Liu, X., Zheng, X., Yu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2024) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05599-3 · Cited by 16
“For example, when collecting the survey data, we ensured the confidentiality of participants’ responses, emphasized the importance of honest answers, disguised the purpose of the research, and measured key variables at different time points (Larson, 2019; Nederhof, 1985).”
Pretending to Support? Duterte's Popularity and Democratic Backsliding in the Philippines
Kasuya, Y., & Miwa, H. (2023) · Journal of East Asian Studies · doi:10.1017/jea.2023.18 · Cited by 16
Wu, J., Cropps, T. A., Phillips, C., Boyle, S., & Pearson, Y. (2023) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-023-00431-w · Cited by 24
“One interpretation of such findings is that respondents might be affected by social desirability bias where they tend to ascribe themselves to traits that are socially desirable (Hoffmann & Musch, 2019; Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundLai, H., Zhao, Y., Li, J., Gong, Q., & Wang, S. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad211 · Cited by 22
Parish, C. L., Feaster, D. J., Pollack, H. A., Horigian, V. E., Wang, X., Jacobs, P., Pereyra, M. R., Drymon, C., Allen, E. M., Gooden, L. K., et al. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/47548 · Cited by 22
“…self-completion methodology, use of a participant identification number, and specification (in the cover letter) that survey completion implies informed consent (in lieu of a signed consent) were additional methods used to minimize time constraints and maximize completion flexibility [104].”
Franchina, V., Klackl, J., & Jonas, E. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04623-z · Cited by 20
“…suggest to explore anger further in an experimental design that comprises prevention and detection of social desirability methods or indirect questioning, which are also valid measures employed to reduce social desirability biases (Nederhof, 1985; Fisher and Katz, 1993; Weydmann et al., 2020).”
BackgroundLindholm, A., & Rapeli, L. (2023) · European Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s1755773922000583 · Cited by 20
“High life satisfaction is not uncommon in survey data due to the influence of social desirability and self-selection (Diener, 1994; Cummins, 2003), although self-administration (used in the FNES) attenuates socially desirable response bias (Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundAdopting to the virtual workplace: identifying leadership affordances in virtual schools
Willermark, S., & Islind, A. (2022) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/jwl-05-2022-0052 · Cited by 16
Yajima, N., Kawaguchi, T., Takahashi, R., Nishiwaki, H., Toyoshima, Y., Oh, K., Odai, T., Kanai, T., Morisky, D., Yamaguchi, T., et al. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1186/s41927-022-00305-8 · Cited by 16
Furnas, A. C., LaPira, T. M., Hertel‐Fernandez, A., Drutman, L., & Kosar, K. R. (2022) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129221098743 · Cited by 43
“The design intentionally minimizes these effects using several established strategies (Nederhof 1985).”
MethodBuchmüller, K., Xu, C., Bearth, A., & Siegrist, M. (2022) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2022.112894 · Cited by 16
Vranjes, I., Salin, D., & Baillien, E. (2021) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678373.2021.1969477 · Cited by 16
“This can probably be attributed to people ’ s tendency to answer questions regarding misconduct in a socially desirable way, resulting in low prevalence rates of enactment of bullying (Nederhof, 1985).”
BackgroundQuantifying Illegal Extraction of Sea Turtles in Costa Rica
Pheasey, H., Glen, G., Allison, N. L., Fonseca, L., Chacon, D., Restrepo, J., & Valverde, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Conservation Science · doi:10.3389/fcosc.2021.705556 · Cited by 16
“Social desirability bias, coupled with the fear of being caught, often causes violators to behave covertly, with reluctance to speak openly about wrongdoing (Nederhof, 1985; Gavin et al., 2009).”
BackgroundThe relationship of 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and individual-level socioeconomic status
Thacher, T., Dudenkov, D. V., Mara, K., Maxson, J., Wi, C., & Juhn, Y. (2019) · Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.105545 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Nederhof, A. J.
- Corresponding author
- Nederhof, Anton J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-280
- ISSN
- 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0992
- OpenAlex
- W2046622454
- Cited by
- 2,340
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 218 · 2024: 182 · 2023: 188 · 2022: 175 · 2021: 186 · 2020: 162 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 134 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 114 · 2014: 97 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 60
- FWCI
- 21.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Keywords
- social desirability bias, self-presentation, self-deception, Social Desirability Scale, randomized response, bogus pipeline, self-administered questionnaire, bias detection, bias prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review