The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast
Abstract
In the present study, subjects had to generate an evaluative judgment about a target person on the basis of his behaviour that had both positive and negative implications. In a previous phase of the study that was ostensibly unrelated to the judgment task, the relevant trait categories were primed. Subsequently, half of the subjects were reminded of the priming episode. Consistent with earlier research (e.g. Lombardi, Higgins and Bargh, 1987; Newman and Uleman, 1990) that used memory of the priming events as a correlational measure, a contrast effect was found under the ‘reminding’ condition and assimilation resulted when subjects were not reminded of the priming episode. This pattern of results is interpreted as the consequence of corrective influences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
Cited by
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM).
Forgas, J. P. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39 · Cited by 3,470
An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement.
Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277 · Cited by 1,371
Mood as information: 20 years later.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2003) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2003.9682896 · Cited by 907
Self-citationBattle of the sexes: gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations
Kray, L. J., Thompson, L., & Galinsky, A. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.942 · Cited by 690
Attitude construction: evaluation in context
Schwarz, N. (2007) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.638 · Cited by 627
Self-citationThe alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication
Stroebe, W., & Strack, F. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691613514450 · Cited by 597
Self-citationThe Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction
Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60017-9 · Cited by 471
Williams, M. J., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000039 · Cited by 374
Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1409 · Cited by 203
Kray, L. J., Reb, J., Galinsky, A. D., & Thompson, L. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203261884 · Cited by 183
Gawronski, B. (2004) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280440000026 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Strack, F., Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Kübler, A., & Wänke, M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-62
- ISSN
- 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0992
- OpenAlex
- W2114317783
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
