The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations
Abstract
Agency (A) and communion (C) are basic dimensions of social judgment and C is typically more important than A. Building on the two‐interest account of bidimensionality of social cognition, we hypothesized that this “C over A” pattern is typical for judging distant persons but is attenuated or even reversed when people judge the self or interdependent persons. In Study 1 we found that the construal of events leading to changes in a target's evaluation was different in dependence on perspective. There was a “C over A” pattern in case of distant others, but an “A over C” pattern in case of close friends or the self. In Study 2 we found that the degree of dependence on one's supervisor determined the “C over A” pattern, as well. C was more important for the supervisor's overall evaluation if there was no dependence, and conversely A was more important in case of dependence. The studies underline the theoretical significance of a social interaction perspective in social judgment, and particularly in judgments on the two basic dimensions. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005 · Cited by 4,567
Interdependence, Interaction, and Relationships
Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145059 · Cited by 1,235
Morality and competence in person- and self-perception
Wojciszke, B. (2005) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280500229619 · Cited by 553
Self-citation
Cited by
Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation.
Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J., & Rozin, P. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034726 · Cited by 852
Communal and Agentic Content in Social Cognition
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7 · Cited by 669
Self-citationCorporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction
Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2012) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.002 · Cited by 560
Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world.
Landau, M. J., Kay, A. C., & Whitson, J. A. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038703 · Cited by 479
Abele, A. E., Hauke, N., Peters, K., Louvet, E., Szymkow, A., & Duan, Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810 · Cited by 426
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wojciszke, B., & Abele, A. E.
- Venue
- European Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-11-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1139-1147
- ISSN
- 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0992
- OpenAlex
- W2116768225
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ejsp.549
- The paper
- Wojciszke, B., & Abele, A. E. (2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.549
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
