Cited by 479Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionFree Will and Agency

Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world.

Open access
Landau, Mark J., Kay, Aaron C., Whitson, Jennifer A.·2015·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

People are motivated to perceive themselves as having control over their lives. Consequently, they respond to events and cognitions that reduce control with compensatory strategies for restoring perceived control to baseline levels. Prior theory and research have documented 3 such strategies: bolstering personal agency, affiliating with external systems perceived to be acting on the self's behalf, and affirming clear contingencies between actions and outcomes within the context of reduced control (here termed specific structure). We propose a 4th strategy: affirming nonspecific structure, or seeking out and preferring simple, clear, and consistent interpretations of the social and physical environments. Formulating this claim suggests that people will respond to reduced control by affirming structured interpretations that are unrelated to the control-reducing condition, and even those that entail otherwise adverse outcomes (e.g., pessimistic health prospects). Section 1 lays the conceptual foundation for our review, situating the proposed phenomenon in the literatures on control motivation and threat-compensation mechanisms. Section 2 reviews studies that have demonstrated that trait and state variations in perceived control predict a wide range of epistemic structuring tendencies, including pattern recognition and causal reasoning. We posit that these tendencies reflect a common desire for a structured understanding of one's environment. Accordingly, a new meta-analysis spanning the reviewed studies (k = 55) revealed that control reduction predicts nonspecific structure affirmation with a moderate effect size (r = .25). Section 3 reviews research on individual differences and situational moderators of this effect. The discussion addresses the interplay of compensatory control strategies and practical implications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0038703

Cites

164 of 164 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Misinformation and propaganda have been linked to the adoption of conspiracy theories as a means of reducing uncertainty.

    “the adoption of conspiracy theories as a means of reducing uncertainty [59]”
  • People experiencing uncertainty-related worries and anxiety often engage in processes of compensatory control to imbue the world with order and predictability.

    “In addition to information seeking and fact-checking, people experiencing uncertainty-related worries and anxiety often engage in processes of compensatory control in an effort to imbue the world with order and predictability [59].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landau, M. J., Kay, A. C., & Whitson, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2015-05
Volume
141
Issue
3
Pages
694-722
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W1980775666
Cited by
479
References
164
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6
FWCI
82.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (BCS-1222047)
  • Social Science and Humanities Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
perceived control, control motivation, pattern recognition, causal reasoning, individual differences, situational moderators
MeSH terms
Defense Mechanisms, Humans, Meta-Analysis as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review