The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technological pathways for bioenergy generation from municipal solid waste: Renewable energy option
Abstract
World's biggest challenge today is safe disposal and treatment of municipal solid waste (MSW). This review presents an overview of pathways for the generation of the bioenergy from MSW, through the biological–chemical–thermal route of treatment, current status, deployment of biochemical–thermochemical conversion technologies for a biogenic fraction of MSW, its challenges and performance. Currently, key challenges posed to the world are energy security, waste management, and climate change. Out of these, waste management across the world is in the dejected state due to lack of proper treatment and conversion technologies. In recent times, pressure on the global environment increased for the use of renewable resources due to depleting fossil fuels. Energy from biomass waste is going to be one of the crucial and dominant sources of renewable energy harness in the future. Conversion of a biogenic fraction of MSW to energy will solve waste management issue as well as offers energy generation in a sustainable manner and can be termed as “Renewable Waste”. This study provides technological pathways for the generation of biofuels using MSW biomass as a feedstock, and the technology progression of various pathways and gaps for implementation of these technologies were also analyzed in this study. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 38: 654–671, 2019
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“MSW has also been increasingly considered as BAF feedstock.”
From Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components (2020) · cites this paper as Dabe et al. 2019
In the citing paper
“Dabe et al. (2019) added that the current technologies could already enable the utilisation of the high-energy value of MSW and alleviate problems associated with landfills.”
From Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components (2020) · cites this paper as Dabe et al. 2019
Citations
Cites
Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources
Nigam, P. S., & Singh, A. (2011) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2010.01.003 · Cited by 2,156
Biofuels Production through Biomass Pyrolysis—A Technological Review
Jahirul, M., Rasul, M., Chowdhury, A., & Ashwath, N. (2012) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en5124952 · Cited by 1,427
The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment
Popp, J., Lakner, Z., Harangi-Rákos, M., & Fári, M. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.056 · Cited by 967
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 98
- 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.312 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.038 · DOI
- 10.1787/weo-2013-en · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.087 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.01.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.10.041 · DOI
- Tchobanglous G., 1993, Integrated Solid Waste Management Engineering Principles and Management Issues
- Diaz L.F., 2002, Solid Waste Handbook
- Benedict A.H., 1988, Composting Municipal Sludge: A Technology Assessment
- Corey R.C., 1969, Principles and Practices of Incineration
- Salvato J.A., 1992, Environmental Engineering and Sanitation
- 10.1007/s10584-013-0965-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.08.004 · DOI
- Eric D.L., 2008, Biofuel production technologies: status, prospects and implications for trade and development
- 10.2516/ogst:2008033 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.renene.2008.04.030 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fenrg.2013.00004 · DOI
- 10.1111/gcbb.12173 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/gcbb.12178 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139151153.006 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01169.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.039 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.10.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.12.049 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.040 · DOI
- 10.3897/biorisk.7.3036 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.057 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2012.03.031 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.092 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.121 · DOI
- CSO, 2013, Energy statistics
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
- AnnepuR. K.&ThemelisN.J. M.S. Thesis on ‘Sustainable Solid Waste Management in India’ Colambia University Waste‐to‐Energy Research and Technology Council (WTERT). (2012)
- 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00119-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.09.025 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.044 · DOI
- Mata‐Alvarez J., 2003, Biomethanization of the organic fraction of Municipal solid wastes
- 10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00260-X · DOI
- 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.515 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.048 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.139 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.03.029 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.116 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1093-0191(02)00049-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.065 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bej.2007.11.019 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.037 · DOI
- Voge G.M., 2002, Super blue box recycling (SUBBOR) enhanced two stageanaerobic digestion process for recycling municipal solid waste: laboratory pilot studies, Bioresource Technology, 101, 1652
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.063 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.050 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.066 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cej.2016.11.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.042 · DOI
- 10.2166/wst.2006.232 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12010-009-8877-4 · DOI
- 10.1080/15435075.2014.890104 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.10.094 · DOI
- 10.1002/ep.11700 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.04.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.099 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.08.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.031 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.065 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.024 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.050 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.097 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.08.022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.07.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.023 · DOI
- California Biomass Collaborative, 2006, A Roadmap for the Development of Biomass in California
- 10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.11.003 · DOI
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [Defra], 2007, Advanced thermal treatment of municipal solid waste
- 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.09.025 · DOI
- E4Tech, 2009, Review of Technologies for Gasification of Biomass and Waste. NNFCC report
- 10.1016/S0196-8904(01)00137-6 · DOI
- Bridgwater T., 2007, Pyrolysis of biomass, IEA Bioenergy: Task 34
- Ringer M., 2006, Large‐Scale Pyrolysis Oil Production and Economic Analysis; Technical Report NREL/TP‐510‐37779
- 10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.033 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaap.2003.09.003 · DOI
- Zhao X., 2001, Biomass pyrolysis in an Argon/Hydrogen Plasma reactor, Chemical Engineering & Technology, 24, 197
- 10.1016/S0165-2370(99)00006-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.10.048 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.040 · DOI · Paper page
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [Defra], 2010, Environmental Permitting Guidance (England and Wales)
- Axelsson C., 2010, Energy from municipal solid waste in Chennai, India—a feasibility study
- CPCB, 2008, Guidelines for Common Hazardous Waste Incineration
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.011 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10098-015-0904-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.016 · DOI
- Rajaeifara M.A., 2015, Data supporting the comparative life cycle assessment of different municipal solid waste management scenarios, Data in Brief, 3, 89
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.02.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.094 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components
Doliente, S. S., Narayan, A., Tapia, J. F. D., Samsatli, N. J., Zhao, Y., & Samsatli, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.00110 · Cited by 295
“Dabe et al. (2019) reviewed the various existing and advancing thermo- and bio-chemical production pathways of syngas and alcohols fromMSW as precursors for BAF conversion.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Dabe, S. J., Prasad, P. J., Vaidya, A. N., & Purohit, H. J.
- Affiliations
- National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Prasad, Poonam J.
- Venue
- Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-09-25
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 654-671
- ISSN
- 1944-7442 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7450
- OpenAlex
- W2892391228
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy (publishedVersion)
- IR@NEERI (CSIR-URDIP) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- municipal solid waste, bioenergy, waste-to-energy, biochemical conversion, thermochemical conversion, biofuels, waste management, energy security, climate change mitigation, biomass feedstock
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review