Cited by 27Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

Investigation of catalyst layer defects in catalyst-coated membrane for PEMFC application: Non-destructive method

Arcot, M.P., Zheng, K., McGrory, J., Fowler, M.W., Pritzker, M.D.·2018·International Journal of Energy Research

Abstract

The commercialization of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells has been hindered by durability problems caused by defects in the manufacturing process. We demonstrate for the first time a non-destructive, non-contact method that uses optical microscopy and image analysis to identify defects that may lead to failure in catalyst-coated membranes (CCMs) of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. This method is applied to 2 commercial CCMs produced by the decal transfer technique. Defects in the catalyst layer (CL) at the beginning-of-life (BOL) are characterized in terms of their initial size and shape, and their propagation is tracked as the CCMs are aged in a non-reactive environment. The defected area in one of the commercial CCMs increases from approximately 2.4% of the total CL area at BOL to 10.5% by end-of-life (EOL). BOL defects in the CL are found to propagate faster in the CCMs stored for 2 years under atmospheric conditions compared with freshly manufactured CCMs with narrow CL defects. Image analysis of another commercial CCM shows the presence of pores with diameters between 5 and 25 μm that comprise 52% of the total pore area in the CL. Other defects such as scratches and missing/empty catalyst areas are identified and characterized, providing a framework for quality control applications. Finally, the effect of defects on fuel cell performance is characterized by measurement of the open-circuit voltage (OCV). These experiments show that CCMs with a large number of cracks in the CL exhibit a voltage loss of 2.55 mV/hr, whereas CCMs with thin/missing/empty CL defects show a loss of 1.12 mV/hr.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/er.4107

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infrared thermography is widely utilized in fuel cell research as a nondestructive diagnostic tool for in-line quality inspection and also works for characterization of membrane pinholes.

    “Infrared (IR) thermography has been widely utilized in fuel cell research as a nondestructive diagnostic tool for in-line quality inspection (Fig. 20a), which also works for the characterization of membrane pinholes [196,218].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arcot, M. P., Zheng, K., McGrory, J., Fowler, M. W., & Pritzker, M. D.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Pritzker, M.D.
Venue
International Journal of Energy Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-06-05
Volume
42
Issue
11
Pages
3615-3632
ISSN
0363-907X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807136876
Cited by
27
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Energy Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Keywords
catalyst coated membranes, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, non-destructive defect detection, image analysis, defect propagation, fuel cell durability, open-circuit voltage loss, catalyst layer porosity, quality control, fuel cell degradation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review