Cited by 46Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Factors determining uptake of a CD‐ROM‐based CBT self‐help treatment for bulimia: patient characteristics and subjective appraisals of self‐help treatment

Murray, Kathryn, Pombo‐Carril, Maria Guadelupe, Bara‐Carril, Nuria, Grover, Miriam, Reid, Yael, Langham, Chris, Birchall, Helen, Williams, Chris +2 more·2003·European Eating Disorders Review

Abstract

Background: Cognitive‐behavioural self‐help treatments are widely advocated as the first step in the management of bulimia nervosa. Very little is known about the characteristics and attitudes of patients who are able to utilize self‐help treatments. Aims: The aim of this study was to identify whether there are any pre‐treatment differences in patient characteristics and patients' expectations about computerized self‐help between those who do or do not take up this type of treatment. Subjects and Methods: 81 patients who were offered a CD‐ROM‐based self‐help treatment for bulimia nervosa completed baseline assessments including a questionnaire assessing their attitudes to and past experiences with self‐help, confidence in using a computer and knowledge about and ability to manage aspects of their eating disorder. Results: Patients who did not take up the CD‐ROM‐based treatment had a significantly lower expectation of the usefulness of self‐help for themselves but not for others. There were no baseline differences between groups in terms of mean BMI and symptom severity, in particular there were no differences in previous utilization of self‐help or attitudes to previous self‐help, or differences in confidence in using a computer. Qualitative comments of participants who failed to take up the package highlighted a diverse range of concerns and anxieties about computer treatment, some of which were based on misunderstandings about this treatment. Conclusions: These findings show that patients' views about self‐help need to be carefully explored and misconceptions corrected if self‐help treatment is to be considered by a subgroup of patients. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/erv.519

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Murray et al found that participants who rejected computerized treatments had significantly lower expectations of the usefulness of self-help and had general concerns, anxiety, and misunderstandings about computerized treatments.

    “This is supported by Murray et al [57], whose study found that participants who rejected computerized treatments had significantly lower expectations of the usefulness of self-help and had general concerns, anxiety, and misunderstandings about computerized treatments.”
  • CCBT has been used for 25 different clinical disorders, not only mental health conditions.

    “Furthermore, CCBT has been used for 25 different clinical disorders [27], not only mental health conditions [59-62].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murray, K., Pombo‐Carril, M. G., Bara‐Carril, N., Grover, M., Reid, Y., Langham, C., Birchall, H., Williams, C., Treasure, J., & Schmidt, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Gartnavel General Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, Ulrike
Venue
European Eating Disorders Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04-25
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
243-260
ISSN
  • 1072-4133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0968
OpenAlex
W2079323949
Cited by
46
References
14
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Eating Disorders Review (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
bulimia nervosa, self-help treatment, treatment uptake, patient expectations, patient characteristics, computer confidence, eating disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review