Cited by 36Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchEnvironmental Chemistry and AnalysisMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants

Anaerobic biotransformation of N-methyl perfluorobutanesulfonamido ethanol and N-ethyl perfluorooctanesulfonamido ethanol

Lange, Cleston C.·2017·Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Abstract

Some fluorochemical products are manufactured using N-methyl perfluorobutanesulfonamido ethanol (MeFBSE), a short-chain replacement for perfluorooctyl-based chemistries N-methyl and N-ethyl perfluorooctanesulfonamido ethanols (EtFOSE). The present study shows for the first time the anaerobic biodegradation of MeFBSE and EtFOSE in municipal digester sludge under methanogenic conditions. Both MeFBSE and EtFOSE were incubated for 108 d with anaerobic digester sludge. Although sterile controls did not remove MeFBSE, it was degraded in live sludge. The loss of MeFBSE coincided with production of N-methyl perfluorobutanesulfonamido acetate (MeFBSAA) and perfluorobutane sulfinate (PFBSI). The biodegradation appeared biphasic, with pseudo first-order loss between days 0 and 70, resulting in approximately 75% removal but no further depletion of MeFBSE between days 70 and 108. By day 108 MeFBSAA and PFBSI accounted for 57 and 40 mol% of initial dose, respectively. Mass balance values in live cultures on days 0, 10, 21, 29, 70, and 108 were 103, 92, 94, 100, 93, and 122%, respectively. The apparent first-order biodegradation rate constant for MeFBSE over the first 70 d was 0.0194 d -1 , and the apparent half-life was 35.8 d. Incubation of EtFOSE with live digester sludge resulted in low-level formation of N-ethyl perfluorooctane-sulfonamido acetate and perfluorooctane sulfinate, which did not form in sterile controls. Although it was not measurably lost, 2 to 3% loss of EtFOSE was calcu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/etc.4014

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lange, C. C.
Affiliations
3M (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Lange, Cleston C.
Venue
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2017-10-25
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
768-779
ISSN
  • 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8618
OpenAlex
W2781701554
Cited by
36
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Keywords
anaerobic biodegradation, methanogenic conditions, biodegradation kinetics, half-life
MeSH terms
Anaerobiosis, Biodegradation, Environmental, Biotransformation, Chromatography, Liquid, Fluorocarbons, Half-Life, Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated, Kinetics, Methane, Sewage, Sulfonamides, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review