Cited by 49Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Evaluation of an approximation method for assessment of overall significance of multiple‐dependent tests in a genomewide association study

Open access
Moskvina, Valentina, O'Dushlaine, Colm, Purcell, Shaun, Craddock, Nick, Holmans, Peter, O'Donovan, Michael C.·2011·Genetic Epidemiology

Abstract

We describe implementation of a set‐based method to assess the significance of findings from genomewide association study data. Our method, implemented in PLINK, is based on theoretical approximation of Fisher's statistics such that the combination of P‐vales at a gene or across a pathway is carried out in a manner that accounts for the correlation structure, or linkage disequilibrium, between single nucleotide polymorphisms. We compare our method to a permutation‐based product of P‐values approach and show a typical correlation in excess of 0.98 for a number of comparisons. The method gives Type I error rates that are less than or equal to the corresponding nominal significance levels, making it robust to the effects of false positives. We show that in broadly similar populations, reference data sets of markers are an appropriate substrate for deriving marker‐marker linkage disequilibrium (LD), negating the need to access individual level genotypes, greatly facilitating its generic applicability. We show that the method is thus robust to LD‐associated bias and has equivalent performance to permutation‐based methods, with a significantly shorter runtime. This is particularly relevant at a time of increasing public availability of significantly larger genetic data sets and should go a long way to assist in the rapid analysis of these data sets. Genet. Epidemiol. 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.35:861‐866, 2011

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gepi.20636

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FORGE and SET SCREEN TEST are meta-analytic approaches that pool SNP P values within genes or pathways while correcting for linkage disequilibrium.

    “FORGE43 and SET SCREEN TEST44 are meta-analysis methods that combine P values across all the SNPs in genes or pathways while adjusting for the confound of LD.”
  • The gene-wide analysis controlled for linkage disequilibrium and different numbers of SNPs per gene using a statistical approach by Brown (1975), adopted by Moskvina et al. (2011) and de Leeuw et al. (2015).

    “The gene-wide analysis was performed based on the summary P-values while controlling for linkage disequilibrium and different numbers of SNPs per gene using a statistical approach by Brown (1975), and adopted for set-based analysis of genetic data by Moskvina et al. (2011) and de Leeuw et al. (2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moskvina, V., O'Dushlaine, C., Purcell, S., Craddock, N., Holmans, P., & O'Donovan, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Moskvina, Valentina
Venue
Genetic Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10-17
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
861-866
ISSN
  • 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2272
OpenAlex
W2138237342
Cited by
49
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetic Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
MRC (UK); NIMH (USA) CONTE (2 P50 MH066392-05A1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
genome-wide association study, Fisher's method, linkage disequilibrium, single nucleotide polymorphisms, permutation tests, type I error rate, PLINK, pathway analysis
MeSH terms
United Kingdom, Humans, Schizophrenia, Linkage Disequilibrium, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review