Cited by 115Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Statistical Testing of Shared Genetic Control for Potentially Related Traits

Open access
Wallace, Chris·2013·Genetic Epidemiology

Abstract

Integration of data from genome‐wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) association studies of different traits should allow researchers to disentangle the genetics of potentially related traits within individually associated regions. Formal statistical colocalisation testing of individual regions requires selection of a set of SNPs summarising the association in a region. We show that the SNP selection method greatly affects type 1 error rates, with published studies having used methods expected to result in substantially inflated type 1 error rates. We show that either avoiding variable selection and instead testing the most informative principal components or integrating over variable selection using Bayesian model averaging can help control type 1 error rates. Application to data from Graves' disease and Hashimoto's thyroiditis reveals a common genetic signature across seven regions shared between the diseases, and indicates that in five of six regions associated with Graves' disease and not Hashimoto's thyroiditis, this more likely reflects genuine absence of association with the latter rather than lack of power. Our examination, by simulation, of the performance of colocalisation tests and associated software will foster more widespread adoption of formal colocalisation testing. Given the increasing availability of large expression and genetic association datasets from disease‐relevant tissue and purified cell populations, coupled with identification of regulatory sequences by projects such as ENCODE, colocalisation analysis has the potential to reveal both shared genetic signatures of related traits and causal disease genes and tissues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gepi.21765

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One colocalization method frames shared causality as the null hypothesis and rejection of this would indicate violation of instrumental variable condition 2.

    “One colocalization method originally proposed by Plagnol et al 112 frames shared causality as the null hypothesis and rejection of this would indicate violation of IV condition 2, i.e. that there are no common causes of the instrument and the outcome.112–114”

    From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [112]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wallace, C.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Wallace, Chris
Venue
Genetic Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-11-05
Volume
37
Issue
8
Pages
802-813
ISSN
  • 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2272
OpenAlex
W2003342692
Cited by
115
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetic Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (089989, 091157)
  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  • Cambridge Institute for Medical Research (CIMR)
  • Wellcome Trust Strategic Award (100140)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
type I error rate, SNP selection, feature selection, principal components, Bayesian model averaging, Graves' disease, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, autoimmune thyroid disease
MeSH terms
Bayes Theorem, Genotype, Graves Disease, Humans, Models, Genetic, Research Design, Linkage Disequilibrium, Bias, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Principal Component Analysis, Hashimoto Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review