Cited by 204Biofield Effects and BiophysicsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and care

Effect of a qigong exercise programme on elderly with depression

Tsang, Hector W. H., Fung, Kelvin M. T., Chan, Ashley S. M., Lee, Grace, Chan, Fong·2006·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives This report released findings of a randomized controlled trial conducted in Hong Kong to further our understanding of the psychosocial effects of qigong on elderly persons with depression. Design Eighty-two participants with a diagnosis of depression or obvious features of depression were recruited and randomly assigned into the intervention and comparison group. The intervention group was given a 16-week period of Qigong practice while the comparison group participated in a newspaper reading group with same duration and frequency. Results After eight weeks of qigong practice, the intervention group participants outstripped themselves in improvement in mood, self-efficacy and personal well being, and physical and social domains of self-concept when compared with comparison subjects. After 16 weeks of practice, the improvement generalized to the daily task domain of the self-concept. Conclusions This report shows that regular qigong practice could relieve depression, improve self-efficacy and personal well being among elderly persons with chronic physical illness and depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.1582

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One trial (Tsang 2006) stopped recruiting when the main outcome measure became statistically significant, rather than stipulating in advance how many people to recruit.

    “One trial (Tsang 2006) stopped recruiting when the main outcome measure became statistically significant, rather than stipulating in advance how many people to recruit.”

    From Exercise for depression (2009) · cites this paper as Tsang 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsang, H. W. H., Fung, K. M. T., Chan, A. S. M., Lee, G., & Chan, F.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Kwai Chung Hospital (CN)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Tsang, Hector W. H.
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09
Volume
21
Issue
9
Pages
890-897
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2146092087
Cited by
204
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biofield Effects and Biophysics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
qigong, depression, older adults, self-efficacy, well-being, self-concept, mood, chronic physical illness, exercise intervention, psychosocial impact
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Affect, Aged, Breathing Exercises, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Socioeconomic Factors, Treatment Outcome, Exercise Movement Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review