Cited by 135Physical Activity and HealthGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesAging, Health, and Disability

Exercise for depression in elderly residents of care homes: a cluster-randomised controlled trial

Open access
Underwood, Martin, Lamb, Sarah E, Eldridge, Sandra, Sheehan, Bart, Slowther, Anne-Marie, Spencer, Anne, Thorogood, Margaret, Atherton, Nicky +7 more·2013·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Depression is common and is associated with poor outcomes among elderly care-home residents. Exercise is a promising low-risk intervention for depression in this population. We tested the hypothesis that a moderate intensity exercise programme would reduce the burden of depressive symptoms in residents of care homes.Methods We did a cluster-randomised controlled trial in care homes in two regions in England; northeast London, and Coventry and Warwickshire. Residents aged 65 years or older were eligible for inclusion. A statistician independent of the study randomised each home (1 to 1·5 ratio, stratified by location, minimised by type of home provider [local authority, voluntary, private and care home, private and nursing home] and size of home [<32 or ≥32 residents]) into intervention and control groups. The intervention package included depression awareness training for care-home staff, 45 min physiotherapist-led group exercise sessions for residents (delivered twice weekly), and a whole home component designed to encourage more physical activity in daily life. The control consisted of only the depression awareness training. Researchers collecting follow-up data from individual participants and the participants themselves were inevitably aware of home randomisation because of the physiotherapists' activities within the home. A researcher masked to study allocation coded NHS routine data. The primary outcome was number of depressive symptoms on the geriatric depression scale-15 (GDS-15). Follow-up was for 12 months. This trial is registered with ISRCTN Register, number ISRCTN43769277.Findings Care homes were randomised between Dec 15, 2008, and April 9, 2010. At randomisation, 891 individuals in 78 care homes (35 intervention, 43 control) had provided baseline data. We delivered 3191 group exercise sessions attended on average by five study participants and five non-study residents. Of residents with a GDS-15 score, 374 of 765 (49%) were depressed at baseline; 484 of 765 (63%) provided 12 month follow-up scores. Overall the GDS-15 score was 0·13 (95% CI -0·33 to 0·60) points higher (worse) at 12 months for the intervention group compared with the control group. Among residents depressed at baseline, GDS-15 score was 0·22 (95% CI -0·52 to 0·95) points higher at 6 months in the intervention group than in the control group. In an end of study cross-sectional analysis, including 132 additional residents joining after randomisation, the odds of being depressed were 0·76 (95% CI 0·53 to 1·09) for the intervention group compared with the control group.Interpretation This moderately intense exercise programme did not reduce depressive symptoms in residents of care homes. In this frail population, alternative strategies to manage psychological symptoms are required.Funding National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60649-2

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The review team used an ICC of 0.03 for cluster-RCTs because none reported an ICC and estimates from other cluster-RCTs of depression interventions in LTC suggested this value, consistent with typical values lower than 0.05.

    “We decided to use an ICC of 0.03, based on estimates from other cluster-RCTs of interventions to reduce symptoms of depression in LTC (Davison 2021b; Underwood 2013).”

    From Psychological therapies for depression in older adults residing in long-term care settings (2024) · cites this paper as Underwood 2013

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says the trial’s intracluster correlation coefficients were mostly close to zero, supporting the use of this care-home depression trial as a source of low-ICC estimates. It does not report an ICC of 0.03; Methods > Statistical analysis instead says the trial assumed 0.05 for sample-size planning. The review team’s choice of 0.03 is therefore not established by this source alone. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sample sizes were recalculated to account for error in cluster RCTs by determining a design effect with a conservative intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.05.

    “Thus, sample sizes were recalculated to account for error in cluster RCTs by determining a design effect 128 with a conservative intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.05, in accordance with past studies 46, 129 .”
  • Some large, multisite trials have failed to find a benefit of exercise in late-life depression samples.

    “The effects of exercise training in this population have been heterogeneous; some large, multisite trials have failed to find a benefit of exercise in LLD samples (23).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Underwood, M., Lamb, S. E., Eldridge, S., Sheehan, B., Slowther, A.-M., Spencer, A., Thorogood, M., Atherton, N., Bremner, S. A., Devine, A., Diaz-Ordaz, K., Ellard, D. R., Potter, R., Spanjers, K., & Taylor, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Underwood, Martin
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
382
Issue
9886
Pages
41-49
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2169679525
Cited by
135
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Advantage West Midlands
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (06/02/01, NF-SI-0512-10103)
  • Health Technology Assessment Programme (06/02/01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
depression, older adults, nursing home residents, exercise intervention, group exercise, employee training, physical activity, Geriatric Depression Scale, nursing homes, long-term care, cluster randomization, home-based exercise, employee attitudes
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, England, Exercise Therapy, Female, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Cluster Analysis, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review