Cited by 425Physical Activity and HealthTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Effect of exercise on depression severity in older people: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Open access
Bridle, Christopher, Spanjers, Kathleen, Patel, Shilpa, Atherton, Nicola M., Lamb, Sarah E.·2012·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The prevelance of depression in older people is high, treatment is inadequate, it creates a substantial burden and is a public health priority for which exercise has been proposed as a therapeutic strategy. Aims: To estimate the effect of exercise on depressive symptoms among older people, and assess whether treatment effect varies depending on the depression criteria used to determine participant eligibility. Method: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of exercise for depression in older people. Results: Nine trials met the inclusion criteria and seven were meta-analysed. Exercise was associated with significantly lower depression severity (standardised mean difference (SMD) =–0.34, 95% CI –0.52 to –0.17), irrespective of whether participant eligibility was determined by clinical diagnosis (SMD =–0.38, 95% CI –0.67 to –0.10) or symptom checklist (SMD =–0.34, 95% CI –0.62 to –0.06). Results remained significant in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that, for older people who present with clinically meaningful symptoms of depression, prescribing structured exercise tailored to individual ability will reduce depression severity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.095174

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bridle, C., Spanjers, K., Patel, S., Atherton, N. M., & Lamb, S. E.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Bridle, Christopher
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2012-09
Volume
201
Issue
3
Pages
180-185
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2140790148
Cited by
425
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BGRO - Business, Governance and Religious Organisations Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
physical activity, depression, older adults, depression severity, exercise therapy, eligibility criteria, diagnosis, symptom checklist, physical activity interventions
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depressive Disorder, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Bias, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review