Cited by 27Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPain Management and Opioid UseOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Pain and self-injury ideation in elderly men and women receiving home care

Open access
Li, Lydia W., Conwell, Yeates·2010·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the associations between self‐injury ideation and pain severity, pain control, and their combination in older adults receiving home care and to examine sex differences in the associations. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis, mixed‐model repeated‐measures design. SETTING: Two publicly funded home care programs in Michigan. PARTICIPANTS: Elderly participants of home care programs (N=16,700). MEASUREMENTS: All participants received in‐home assessments at baseline and every 3 months thereafter using a standardized instrument that included questions about self‐injury ideation and pain experience. Assessment data collected over 1 year after baseline were used. RESULTS: Participants' average age was 77.5; 72.2% were female, and 81.4% were white. At baseline, 1.4% of the sample (2.1% of men and 1.2% of women) had self‐injury ideation. The risk of self‐injury ideation in men increased with pain severity (some pain: adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.12–3.13; severe pain: AOR=2.36, 95% CI=1.29–4.30) and pain control (controlled by medication: AOR=1.81, 95% CI=1.08–3.04; uncontrolled by medication: AOR=3.39, 95% CI=1.45–7.95). Men with severe and uncontrolled pain were at especially high risk (AOR=4.10, 95% CI=1.37–12.28). No measures of pain were significantly associated with self‐injury ideation in women. Sex differences in the association between pain severity and self‐injury ideation were significant at P <.05. CONCLUSION: Pain in older adults receiving home care should be taken seriously and treated as one means to reduce risk of suicide. Pain assessment should include severity and control of pain. In men, complaints about pain should prompt questioning about self‐injury ideation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03151.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Li and Conwell found that men with severe and uncontrolled pain were at especially high risk for self injury ideation, whereas no such association was observed in women.

    “Li and Conwell found that men with severe and uncontrolled pain were at especially high risk for self injury ideation, whereas no such association was observed in women (31).”

    From Suicide in older adults (2011) · cites this paper as [31]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, L. W., & Conwell, Y.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11
Volume
58
Issue
11
Pages
2160-2165
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1512680038
Cited by
27
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG‐024824, P30AG024824)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH071604, R24MH071604)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD041028)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
pain intensity, pain management, older adults, home care, sex differences, suicide risk, pain assessment, older men
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Pain, Severity of Illness Index, Self-Injurious Behavior, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review