Cited by 24Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesNursing care and research

Dementia care navigation: A systematic review on different service types and their prevalence

Open access
Giebel, Clarissa, Reilly, Siobhan, Gabbay, Mark, Dickinson, Julie, Tetlow, Hilary, Hogan, Hayley, Griffiths, Alys, Cooper, Claudia·2023·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Dementia Care Navigators (DCNs) are professionals without clinical training, who provide individualised emotional and practical support to people living with dementia, working alongside clinical services. Navigator services have been implemented but the service offered vary without a consistent overview provided. The aim of this narrative systematic review was to describe and compare existing service formats, and to synthesise evidence regarding their implementation and impacts. Methods: The review was registered on PROSPERO [CRD42021292518]. Three electronic databases were searched and included studies reported on a DCN service, defined as a service in which non‐clinically trained workers provide personalised advice and support to people with dementia and/or carers in the community. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and titles and read through full papers for inclusion. Risk of bias was assessed using the Standard Quality Assessment QualSyst. Results: We included 14 papers reporting on six studies. All services were US‐based and only varied by integration and training provided. Studies reported different degrees of impact on service utilisation and on symptoms and mental well‐being of people with dementia and their carers, with too little evidence to draw substantial/meaningful conclusions and studies employing different outcome measures. One study evidenced greater impacts on people with more advanced dementia compared to earlier stages. Conclusions: DCN services have the potential to effectively provide non‐clinical support to people with dementia and carers from the point of diagnosis. Further research from countries other than the USA, focusing on the impact on social care and social support service access and utilisation, and utilising similar established outcome measures are required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.5977

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some research suggests that dementia care coordination is mostly a non-clinical role placed in the community, who are likely to face barriers due to access, and lack of standardised documentation.

    “In contrast to the model’s recommendation and our findings, some research suggests that dementia care coordination is mostly a non-clinical role placed in the community, who are likely to face barriers due to access, and lack of standardised documentation [110, 111].”

    From Do hospital-to-home transitions work for older adults with multiple long-term conditions including dementia? A realist review (2025) · cites this paper as [110]

    Section 3.3 describes the reviewed dementia care navigators as non-clinical professionals, and the Introduction says they link people to local services. But the Introduction places them within either clinical or non-clinical infrastructure and describes access barriers faced by people with dementia and carers, not necessarily by navigators. No passage found supports the asserted lack of standardised documentation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Alzheimer's Society. Left to Cope Alone: The Unmet Support Needs after a Dementia Diagnosis. Alzheimer's Society; 2022. How to cite this article: Giebel C., Reilly S., Gabbay M., et al. Dementia care navigation: a systematic review on different service types and their prevalence. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023;e5977. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5977

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giebel, C., Reilly, S., Gabbay, M., Dickinson, J., Tetlow, H., Hogan, H., Griffiths, A., & Cooper, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Centre for Applied Dementia Studies University of Bradford Bradford UK
  • NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (GB)
  • Alzheimer's Society (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Giebel, Clarissa
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-08
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
e5977-e5977
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W4385441688
Cited by
24
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
dementia care, caregiver support, service integration, navigator training, service utilization, psychological well-being, community-based support
MeSH terms
Dementia, Humans, Mental Health, Social Support, Prevalence, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review