Cited by 258Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging of verbal fluency and confrontation naming using compressed image acquisition to permit overt responses

Open access

Abstract

Verbal fluency and confrontation naming, two tests of word retrieval, are of great utility in the field of cognitive neuroscience. However, in the context of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), movement artefact has necessitated the use of covert paradigms, which has limited clinical application. We developed two overt fMRI paradigms that allowed for performance measurement and hence were appropriate for use with patient groups. The paradigms incorporated a blocked-design and compressed-acquisition methodology where cues were presented and responses made in a "silent" period allowing for performance measurement. The slow response pace was specifically designed for older and potentially cognitively impaired participants. Verbal fluency was associated with activation in the middle frontal gyrus (Brodmann areas 46 and 9), anterior cingulate gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus (area 44 and 45). Confrontation naming activated areas of the temporo-occipital cortices (areas 18, 19, and 37) and the inferior frontal gyrus. The two paradigms successfully activated regions involved in executive and word retrieval processes and overcame the potential artefacts resulting from overt speech during image acquisition, providing useful neuropsychological tools to investigate cognitive deficits in clinical populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.10126

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 67 references

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Baddeley AD, 1986, Working memory
  2. 10.1037/0894-4105.12.2.259 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:2<89::AID-HBM2>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
  4. Kaplan EF, 1983, The Boston naming test
  5. McKenna P, 1983, The graded naming test
  6. Nelson HE, 1991, Restandardisation of the NART against the WAIS‐R
  7. Raven JC, 1958, Guide to standard progressive matrices
  8. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199906)41:6<1274::AID-MRM27>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–258 of 258

Metadata

Authors
Abrahams, S., Goldstein, L. H., Simmons, A., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S. C. R., Giampietro, V. P., Andrew, C. M., & Leigh, P. N.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-07-22
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
29-40
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2102846437
Cited by
258
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
verbal fluency, confrontation naming, word retrieval, overt speech, motion artifacts, blocked designs, middle frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, temporo-occipital cortex, executive function, cognitive impairment, neuropsychological assessment
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Aged, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Speech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review