The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging of verbal fluency and confrontation naming using compressed image acquisition to permit overt responses
Open accessAbstract
Verbal fluency and confrontation naming, two tests of word retrieval, are of great utility in the field of cognitive neuroscience. However, in the context of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), movement artefact has necessitated the use of covert paradigms, which has limited clinical application. We developed two overt fMRI paradigms that allowed for performance measurement and hence were appropriate for use with patient groups. The paradigms incorporated a blocked-design and compressed-acquisition methodology where cues were presented and responses made in a "silent" period allowing for performance measurement. The slow response pace was specifically designed for older and potentially cognitively impaired participants. Verbal fluency was associated with activation in the middle frontal gyrus (Brodmann areas 46 and 9), anterior cingulate gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus (area 44 and 45). Confrontation naming activated areas of the temporo-occipital cortices (areas 18, 19, and 37) and the inferior frontal gyrus. The two paradigms successfully activated regions involved in executive and word retrieval processes and overcame the potential artefacts resulting from overt speech during image acquisition, providing useful neuropsychological tools to investigate cognitive deficits in clinical populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While providing a behavioral correlate, paced overt single word production tasks are also problematic. These procedures reduce cognitive demands relative to the behavioral task by allowing subjects more time to reflect upon their word choice, while increasing the need to inhibit responses (see Basho et al., 2007, and Abrahams et al., 2003 for discussions of these issues).”
From Neural systems supporting lexical search guided by letter and semantic category cues: a self-paced overt response fMRI study of verbal fluency (2010) · cites this paper as Abrahams et al., 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,798
Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain
Laitinen, L. (1989) · Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/0303-8467(89)90128-5 · Cited by 7,565
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.6.2.174 · Cited by 5,604
Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986) · Consciousness and Self-Regulation · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1 · Cited by 4,455
Movement‐Related effects in fMRI time‐series
Friston, K. J., Williams, S., Howard, R., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Turner, R. (1996) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910350312 · Cited by 3,774
Self-citationSnodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174 · Cited by 3,635
Exploring the Central Executive
Baddeley, A. (1996) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/713755608 · Cited by 2,390
A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests
Selnes, O. A. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.11.1856-a · Cited by 2,278
Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation
Thompson‐Schill, S. L., D’Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.26.14792 · Cited by 2,137
Thurstone, L. L. (1973) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-6129-9_8 · Cited by 2,126
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Baddeley AD, 1986, Working memory
- 10.1037/0894-4105.12.2.259 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:2<89::AID-HBM2>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
- Kaplan EF, 1983, The Boston naming test
- McKenna P, 1983, The graded naming test
- Nelson HE, 1991, Restandardisation of the NART against the WAIS‐R
- Raven JC, 1958, Guide to standard progressive matrices
- 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199906)41:6<1274::AID-MRM27>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An fMRI investigation of syllable sequence production
Bohland, J. W., & Guenther, F. H. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.173 · Cited by 561
Costafreda, S. G., Fu, C. H. Y., Lee, L., Everitt, B., Brammer, M. J., & David, A. S. (2006) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20221 · Cited by 496
Self-citationTakahashi, T., Takikawa, Y., Kawagoe, R., Shibuya, S., Iwano, T., & Kitazawa, S. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.012 · Cited by 395
Birn, R. M., Kenworthy, L., Case, L., Caravella, R., Jones, T. B., Bandettini, P. A., & Martin, A. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.036 · Cited by 377
Enhanced visual functioning in autism: An ALE meta-analysis
Samson, F., Mottron, L., Soulières, I., & Zeffiro, T. A. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21307 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Abrahams, S., Goldstein, L. H., Simmons, A., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S. C. R., Giampietro, V. P., Andrew, C. M., & Leigh, P. N.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07-22
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-40
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6872028
- OpenAlex
- W2102846437
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 4.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- verbal fluency, confrontation naming, word retrieval, overt speech, motion artifacts, blocked designs, middle frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, temporo-occipital cortex, executive function, cognitive impairment, neuropsychological assessment
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Aged, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Speech
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
