The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender effects on cortical thickness and the influence of scaling
Open accessAbstract
Using magnetic resonance imaging and well‐validated computational cortical pattern matching methods in a large and well‐matched sample of healthy subjects (n = 60), we analyzed the regional specificity of gender‐related cortical thickness differences across the lateral and medial cortices at submillimeter resolution. To establish the influences of brain size correction on gender effects, comparisons were performed with and without applying affine transformations to scale each image volume to a template. We revealed significantly greater cortical thickness in women compared to men, after correcting for individual differences in brain size, while no significant regional thickness increases were observed in males. The pattern and direction of the results were similar without brain size correction, although effects were less pronounced and a small cortical region in the lateral temporal lobes showed greater thickness in males. Our gender‐specific findings support a dimorphic organization in male and female brains that appears to involve the architecture of the cortical mantle and that manifests as increased thickness in female brains. This sexual dimorphism favoring women, even without correcting for brain size, may have functional significance and possibly account for gender‐specific abilities and/or behavioral differences between sexes. Hum Brain Mapp, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods
Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (2000) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0582 · Cited by 8,676
A Voxel-Based Morphometric Study of Ageing in 465 Normal Adult Human Brains
Good, C. D., Johnsrude, I. S., Ashburner, J., Henson, R. N. A., Friston, K. J., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0786 · Cited by 4,561
Changes in grey matter induced by training
Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., & May, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/427311a · Cited by 2,373
Mapping cortical change across the human life span
Sowell, E. R., Peterson, B. S., Thompson, P. M., Welcome, S. E., Henkenius, A. L., & Toga, A. W. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1008 · Cited by 2,328
Self-citationThinning of the Cerebral Cortex in Aging
Salat, D. H. (2004) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh032 · Cited by 1,851
Gur, R. C., Turetsky, B. I., Matsui, M., Yan, M., Bilker, W., Hughett, P., & Gur, R. E. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-10-04065.1999 · Cited by 909
Regionally Localized Thinning of the Cerebral Cortex in Schizophrenia
Kuperberg, G. R., Broome, M. R., McGuire, P. K., David, A. S., Eddy, M., Ozawa, F., Goff, D., West, W. C., Williams, S. C. R., van der Kouwe, A. J. W., et al. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.878 · Cited by 843
Sex Differences in Brain Maturation during Childhood and Adolescence
De Bellis, M. D. (2001) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.6.552 · Cited by 728 · cited 3×
“These have been found to influence brain tissue volumes and cortical thickness measures in previous studies [Courchesne et al., 2000; De Bellis et al., 2001; Good et al., 2001b; Sowell et al., 2003, 2004].”
BackgroundResultThree-dimensional statistical analysis of sulcal variability in the human brain
Thompson, P. M., Schwartz, C., Lin, R. T., Khan, A. A., & Toga, A. W. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-13-04261.1996 · Cited by 346
Self-citationMeasurement of cortical thickness using an automated 3-D algorithm: a validation study
Kabani, N., Le Goualher, G., MacDonald, D., & Evans, A. C. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0652 · Cited by 250
Cited by
Harmonization of cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites
Fortin, J.-P., Cullen, N., Sheline, Y. I., Taylor, W. D., Aselcioglu, I., Cook, P. A., Adams, P., Cooper, C., Fava, M., McGrath, P. J., et al. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.024 · Cited by 1,580
Why sex matters for neuroscience
Cahill, L. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1909 · Cited by 1,540
Sex Differences in the Adult Human Brain: Evidence from 5216 UK Biobank Participants
Ritchie, S. J., Cox, S. R., Shen, X., Lombardo, M. V., Reus, L. M., Alloza, C., Harris, M. A., Alderson, H. L., Hunter, S., Neilson, E., et al. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy109 · Cited by 855
“[27-29]), though our greater statistical power allowed us to find smaller differences in thickness across the cortex.”
BackgroundWhy are autism spectrum conditions more prevalent in males?
Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M. V., Auyeung, B., Ashwin, E., Chakrabarti, B., & Knickmeyer, R. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001081 · Cited by 754
Sowell, E. R., Peterson, B. S., Kan, E., Woods, R. P., Yoshii, J., Bansal, R., Xu, D., Zhu, H., Thompson, P. M., & Toga, A. W. (2007) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl066 · Cited by 695
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Luders, E., Narr, K. L., Thompson, P. M., Rex, D. E., Woods, R. P., DeLuca, H., Jancke, L., & Toga, A. W.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-25
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 314-324
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- OpenAlex
- W1980715637
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 9.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender effects on cortical thickness and the influence of scaling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.20187
- The paper
- Luders, E., Narr, K. L., Thompson, P. M., Rex, D. E., Woods, R. P., DeLuca, H., Jancke, L., & Toga, A. W. (2006). Gender effects on cortical thickness and the influence of scaling. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
