Cited by 44Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Neural activity of the anterior insula in emotional processing depends on the individuals' emotional susceptibility

Open access
Iaria, Giuseppe, Committeri, Giorgia, Pastorelli, Concetta, Pizzamiglio, Luigi, Watkins, Kate E., Carota, Antonio·2008·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Differences in personality factors between individuals may manifest themselves with different patterns of neural activity while individuals process stimuli with emotional content. We attempted to verify this hypothesis by investigating emotional susceptibility (ES), a specific emotional trait of the human personality defined as the tendency to "experience feelings of discomfort, helplessness, inadequacy and vulnerability" after exposure to stimuli with emotional valence. By administering a questionnaire evaluating the individuals' ES, we selected two groups of participants with high and low ES respectively. Then, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate differences between the groups in the neural activity involved while they were processing emotional stimuli in an explicit (focusing on the content of the stimuli) or an incidental (focusing on spatial features of the stimuli, irrespectively of their content) way. The results showed a selective difference in brain activity between groups only in the explicit processing of the emotional stimuli: bilateral activity of the anterior insula was present in subjects with high ES but not in subjects with low ES. This difference in neural activity within the anterior insula proved to be purely functional since no brain morphological differences were found between groups, as assessed by a voxel-based morphometry analysis. Although the role of the anterior insula in the processing of contexts perceived as emotionally salient is well established, the present study provides the first evidence of a modulation of the insular activity depending on the individuals' ES trait of personality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.20393

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The structural characteristics of hippocampus and amygdala are associated with cognitive and emotional processing in waking tasks.

    “the structural characteristics of hippocampus and amygdala are associated with cognitive and emotional processing in waking tasks”

    From The Functional Role of Dreaming in Emotional Processes (2019) · cites this paper as Iaria et al., 2008

    The Discussion (page not supplied) links amygdala activity to emotional processing in a photograph task and reports prior findings relating amygdala gray matter volume to personality traits. It does not link structural characteristics of either the amygdala or hippocampus to cognitive and emotional processing during waking tasks; the hippocampus is not addressed in the retrieved passages. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Review.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iaria, G., Committeri, G., Pastorelli, C., Pizzamiglio, L., Watkins, K. E., & Carota, A.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04-05
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
363-373
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2134896823
Cited by
44
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministero della Salute
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
anterior insula, emotional vulnerability, emotional processing, personality traits, emotional valence, voxel-based morphometry
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Personality, Photic Stimulation, Psychological Tests, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review