Cited by 124Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchVisual perception and processing mechanismsSleep and related disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

fMRI evidence for multisensory recruitment associated with rapid eye movements during sleep.

Open access

Abstract

We studied the neural correlates of rapid eye movement during sleep (REM) by timing REMs from video recording and using rapid event‐related functional MRI. Consistent with the hypothesis that REMs share the brain systems and mechanisms with waking eye movements and are visually‐targeted saccades, we found REM‐locked activation in the primary visual cortex, thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN), ‘visual claustrum’, retrosplenial cortex (RSC, only on the right hemisphere), fusiform gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and the oculomotor circuit that controls awake saccadic eye movements (and subserves awake visuospatial attention). Unexpectedly, robust activation also occurred in non‐visual sensory cortices, motor cortex, language areas, and the ascending reticular activating system, including basal forebrain, the major source of cholinergic input to the entire cortex. REM‐associated activation of these areas, especially non‐visual primary sensory cortices, TRN and claustrum, parallels findings from waking studies on the interactions between multiple sensory data, and their ‘binding’ into a unified percept, suggesting that these mechanisms are also shared in waking and dreaming and that the sharing goes beyond the expected visual scanning mechanisms. Surprisingly, REMs were associated with a decrease in signal in specific periventricular subregions, matching the distribution of the serotonergic supraependymal plexus. REMs might serve as a useful task‐free probe into major brain systems for functional brain imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.20635

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 69 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–124 of 124

Metadata

Authors
Hong, C. C., Harris, J. C., Pearlson, G. D., Kim, J., Calhoun, V. D., Fallon, J. H., Golay, X., Gillen, J. S., Simmonds, D. J., van Zijl, P. C. M., Zee, D. S., & Pekar, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Hartford Hospital (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Hong, Charles Chong‐Hwa
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-10-28
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
1705-1722
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2141802213
Cited by
124
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH 43326, R01MH043326)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB000840, R01EB020407, R01EB005846, P41EB015909, R01EB004130, R01EB006841)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR-00052, P41RR15241, P41RR015241, M01RR000052)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
REM sleep, saccades, primary visual cortex, thalamic reticular nucleus, retrosplenial cortex, fusiform gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, ascending reticular activating system, cholinergic input, multisensory integration
MeSH terms
Adult, Afferent Pathways, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electrooculography, Female, Fingers, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Perception, Psychomotor Performance, Sensation, Sleep, Sleep, REM, Video Recording, Polysomnography, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review