The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of the cingulate cortex as neural generator of the N200 and P300 in a tactile response inhibition task
Open accessAbstract
Both the N200 and P300, which are, for example, evoked by Go/Nogo or Stop‐Signal tasks, have long been interpreted as indicators for inhibition processes. Such interpretations have recently been challenged, and interest in the exact neural generators of these brain responses is continuously growing. Using recent methodological advancements, source estimations for the N200 and P300 as evoked by a tactile response inhibition task were computed. Current density reconstructions were also calculated accounting for interindividual differences in head geometry by incorporating information from T1‐weighted magnetic resonance images. To ease comparability with relevant paradigms, the task was designed to mimic important characteristics of both Go/Nogo and Stop‐Signal tasks as prototypes for a larger set of paradigms probing response inhibition. A network of neural generators was revealed, which has previously been shown to act in concert with executive control processes and thus is in full agreement with observations from other modalities. Importantly, a spatial segregation of midcingulate sources was observed. Our experimental data indicate that a left anterior region of the midcingulate cortex (MCC) is a major neural generator of the N200, whereas the midcingulate generator of the P300 is located in the right posterior MCC. Analyses of the P300 also revealed several areas, which have previously been associated with motor functions, for example, the precentral region. Our data clearly suggest a neuroanatomical and therefore also functional dissociation of the N200 and P300, a finding that cannot easily be provided by other imaging techniques. Hum Brain Mapp, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“in humans, a tactile response inhibition task has identified this region's involvement in generating the positive event-related potential (P300)”
From An oxytocin-induced facilitation of neural and emotional responses to social touch correlates inversely with autism traits (2014) · cites this paper as Huster et al, 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details.
Pascual-Marqui, R. D. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 3,329
Sridharan, D., Levitin, D. J., & Menon, V. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0800005105 · Cited by 2,892
Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control
Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089910 · Cited by 2,891
Michel, C., Murray, M. M., Lantz, G., Gonzalez, S., Spinelli, L., & de Peralta, R. G. (2004) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.06.001 · Cited by 1,771
Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans
Aron, A. R., Fletcher, P. C., Bullmore, E. T., Sahakian, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1003 · Cited by 1,771
Motor Areas of the Medial Wall: A Review of Their Location and Functional Activation
Picard, N., & Strick, P. L. (1996) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/6.3.342 · Cited by 1,712
Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.3.1.17 · Cited by 1,250
Review on solving the inverse problem in EEG source analysis
Grech, R., Cassar, T., Muscat, J., Camilleri, K. P., Fabri, S. G., Zervakis, M., Xanthopoulos, P., Sakkalis, V., & Vanrumste, B. (2008) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-5-25 · Cited by 1,193
Picard, N., & Strick, P. L. (2001) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(01)00266-5 · Cited by 1,184
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control
Bari, A., & Robbins, T. W. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.005 · Cited by 1,921
Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: Functional networks and cognitive contributions
Huster, R. J., Enriquez‐Geppert, S., Lavallee, C. F., Falkenstein, M., & Herrmann, C. S. (2012) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.001 · Cited by 794
Self-citationTheta lingua franca: A common mid‐frontal substrate for action monitoring processes
Cavanagh, J. F., Zambrano‐Vazquez, L., & Allen, J. J. B. (2012) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01293.x · Cited by 651
Enriquez-Geppert, S., Konrad, C., Pantev, C., & Huster, R. J. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.043 · Cited by 376
Self-citationLuijten, M., Machielsen, M. W. J., Veltman, D. J., Hester, R., de Haan, L., & Franken, I. H. A. (2014) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.130052 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Huster, R. J., Westerhausen, R., Pantev, C., & Konrad, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Münster (DE)
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-16
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1260-1271
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6871040
- OpenAlex
- W1986991334
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- N2 component, P300, midcingulate cortex, response inhibition, neural generators, current density reconstruction, source localization, go/no-go task, stop-signal task, executive function, hemispheric lateralization, primary motor cortex
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Decision Making, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Physical Stimulation, Reaction Time, Touch, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
