The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural correlates of cognitive control deficits in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury
Abstract
There is a growing body of research showing that cerebral pathophysiological processes triggered by pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (pmTBI) may extend beyond the usual clinical recovery timeline. It is paramount to further unravel these processes, because the possible long‐term cognitive effects resulting from ongoing secondary injury in the developing brain are not known. In the current fMRI study, neural processes related to cognitive control were studied in 181 patients with pmTBI at sub‐acute (SA; ~1 week) and early chronic (EC; ~4 months) stages post‐injury. Additionally, a group of 162 age‐ and sex‐matched healthy controls (HC) were recruited at equivalent time points. Proactive (post‐cue) and reactive (post‐probe) cognitive control were examined using a multimodal attention fMRI paradigm for either congruent or incongruent stimuli. To study brain network function, the triple‐network model was used, consisting of the executive and salience networks (collectively known as the cognitive control network), and the default mode network. Additionally, whole‐brain voxel‐wise analyses were performed. Decreased deactivation was found within the default mode network at the EC stage following pmTBI during both proactive and reactive control. Voxel‐wise analyses revealed sub‐acute hypoactivation of a frontal area of the cognitive control network (left pre‐supplementary motor area) during proactive control, with a reversed effect at the EC stage after pmTBI. Similar effects were observed in areas outside of the triple‐network during reactive control. Group differences in activation during proactive control were limited to the visual domain, whereas for reactive control findings were more pronounced during the attendance of auditory stimuli. No significant correlations were present between task‐related activations and (persistent) post‐concussive symptoms. In aggregate, current results show alterations in neural functioning during cognitive control in pmTBI up to 4 months post‐injury, regardless of clinical recovery. We propose that subacute decreases in activity reflect a general state of hypo‐excitability due to the injury, while early chronic hyperactivation represents a compensatory mechanism to prevent default mode interference and to retain cognitive control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“(2) Hypoactivation in the cognitive control network (left pre-supplementary motor area) during proactive control at the subacute stage, with hyperactivation at the early chronic stage.”
From A systematic review of brain structural and functional alterations in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (2026) · cites this paper as van der Horn et al. (2023)
In the citing paper
“(1) pmTBI showed reduced deactivation of the default mode network at the early chronic stage during both proactive and reactive cognitive control.”
From A systematic review of brain structural and functional alterations in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (2026) · cites this paper as van der Horn et al. (2023)
In the citing paper
“(3) Alterations were more pronounced in the visual domain for proactive control and in the auditory domain for reactive control.”
From A systematic review of brain structural and functional alterations in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (2026) · cites this paper as van der Horn et al. (2023)
In the citing paper
“Post-injury functional alterations across core networks—including the default mode network (DMN), executive control network (ECN), salience network (SN) (van der Horn et al., 2023), limbic, and cerebellar systems—provide direct neural explanations for observed cognitive-behavioral deficits.”
From A systematic review of brain structural and functional alterations in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (2026) · cites this paper as van der Horn et al., 2023
In the citing paper
“(4) Task-related activations were not correlated with post-concussive symptoms.”
From A systematic review of brain structural and functional alterations in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (2026) · cites this paper as van der Horn et al. (2023)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction
Uddin, L. Q. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3857 · Cited by 2,083
Schmahmann, J. D. (2019) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.005 · Cited by 1,625
Zemek, R., Barrowman, N., Freedman, S. B., Gravel, J., Gagnon, I., McGahern, C., Aglipay, M., Sangha, G., Boutis, K., Beer, D., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1203 · Cited by 900
Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., & Castellanos, F. X. (2007) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.02.005 · Cited by 890
Salience network integrity predicts default mode network function after traumatic brain injury
Bonnelle, V., Ham, T. E., Leech, R., Kinnunen, K. M., Mehta, M. A., Greenwood, R. J., & Sharp, D. J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1113455109 · Cited by 606
Neurocognitive outcomes and recovery after pediatric TBI: meta-analytic review of the literature
Babikian, T., & Asarnow, R. (2009) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0015268 · Cited by 557
Neuroimaging after mild traumatic brain injury: review and meta-analysis
Eierud, C., Craddock, R. C., Fletcher, S., Aulakh, M., King-Casas, B., Kuehl, D., & LaConte, S. M. (2014) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.12.009 · Cited by 524
Chadwick, L., Roth, E., Minich, N. M., Taylor, H. G., Bigler, E. D., Cohen, D. M., Bacevice, A., Mihalov, L. K., Bangert, B. A., Zumberge, N. A., et al. (2021) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2020.7513 · Cited by 53
Cognition and post-concussive symptom status after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury
Robertson-Benta, C. R., Pabbathi Reddy, S., Stephenson, D. D., Sicard, V., Hergert, D. C., Dodd, A. B., Campbell, R. A., Phillips, J. P., Meier, T. B., Quinn, D. K., et al. (2024) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2023.2181946 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0808187106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1089/brain.2015.0379 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.047 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/BF03203962 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.071 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102129 · DOI
- 10.1089/brain.2016.0475 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0271678X19896883 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110664 · DOI
- 10.1089/neu.2015.3958 · DOI
- 10.1089/neu.1996.13.255 · DOI
- 10.1006/nimg.1998.0419 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.2015.0348 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1355617713000702 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.07.012 · DOI
- 10.3766/jaaa.16051 · doi:10.3766/jaaa.16051
- 10.1097/00001199-199309000-00009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1089/neu.2018.6117 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S1355617711001226 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/09602011.2011.652496 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2407(09)03706-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008488 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201470 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.06.005 · DOI
- 10.1002/hbm.24778 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.31887/DCNS.2011.13.2/tmcallister · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058248 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3109/02699052.2014.915987 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/cercor/bhu023 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhm135 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.08.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3171/2020.9.PEDS20421 · DOI
- 10.1002/hbm.24424 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brs.2016.11.011 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.04.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11682-017-9724-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.08.034 · DOI
- 10.1093/jpepsy/jsac076 · DOI
- 10.1002/jmri.27249 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/hbm.23126 · DOI
- 10.1111/acem.12696 · DOI
Cited by
Xu, H., Wu, S., Zhan, H., Xu, G., Zhao, J., & Yin, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1879109
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Horn, H. J., Dodd, A. B., Wick, T. V., Robertson‐Benta, C. R., McQuaid, J. R., Hittson, A. K., Ling, J. M., Zotev, V., Ryman, S. G., Erhardt, E. B., Phillips, J. P., Campbell, R. A., Sapien, R. E., & Mayer, A. R.
- Affiliations
- The Mind Research Network/LBERI Albuquerque New Mexico USA
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico USA
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico USA
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-10-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6173-6184
- ISSN
- 1065-9471
- 1097-0193
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 9
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (P30 GM122734, R01 NS098494‐03S1A1, NIH 01 R01 NS098494‐01A1)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.