Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,516

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consensus Proposals for a Unified System of Nomenclature of Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes *

Open access
Simmonds, Peter, Bukh, Jens, Combet, Christophe, Deléage, Gilbert, Enomoto, Nobuyuki, Feinstone, Stephen, Halfon, Phillippe, Inchauspé, Geneviève, Kuiken, Carla, Maertens, Geert, Mizokami, Masashi, Murphy, Donald G., Okamoto, Hiroaki, Pawlotsky, Jean-Michel, Penin, François, Sablon, Erwin, Shin-I, Tadasu, Stuyver, Lieven J., Thiel, Heinz-Jürgen, Viazov, Sergei, Weiner, Amy J., Widell, Anders·2005·Hepatology

Abstract

International standardization and coordination of the nomenclature of variants of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is increasingly needed as more is discovered about the scale of HCV-related liver disease and important biological and antigenic differences that exist between variants. A group of scientists expert in the field of HCV genetic variability, and those involved in development of HCV sequence databases, the Hepatitis Virus Database (Japan), euHCVdb (France), and Los Alamos (United States), met to re-examine the status of HCV genotype nomenclature, resolve conflicting genotype or subtype names among described variants of HCV, and draw up revised criteria for the assignment of new genotypes as they are discovered in the future. A comprehensive listing of all currently classified variants of HCV incorporates a number of agreed genotype and subtype name reassignments to create consistency in nomenclature. The paper also contains consensus proposals for the classification of new variants into genotypes and subtypes, which recognizes and incorporates new knowledge of HCV genetic diversity and epidemiology. A proposal was made that HCV variants be classified into 6 genotypes (representing the 6 genetic groups defined by phylogenetic analysis). Subtype name assignment will be either confirmed or provisional, depending on the availability of complete or partial nucleotide sequence data, or remain unassigned where fewer than 3 examples of a new subtype have been described. In conclusion , these proposals provide the framework by which the HCV databases store and provide access to data on HCV, which will internationally coordinate the assignment of new genotypes and subtypes in the future. (Hepatology 2005.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.20819

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,516

Metadata

Authors
Simmonds, P., Bukh, J., Combet, C., Deléage, G., Enomoto, N., Feinstone, S., Halfon, P., Inchauspé, G., Kuiken, C., Maertens, G., Mizokami, M., Murphy, D. G., Okamoto, H., Pawlotsky, J.-M., Penin, F., Sablon, E., Shin-I, T., Stuyver, L. J., Thiel, H.-J., Viazov, S., Weiner, A. J., & Widell, A.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2005-10
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
962-973
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077103006
Cited by
1,516
References
1
FWCI
46.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus Proposals for a Unified System of Nomenclature of Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes *. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.20819
The paper
Simmonds, P., Bukh, J., Combet, C., Deléage, G., Enomoto, N., Feinstone, S., Halfon, P., Inchauspé, G., Kuiken, C., Maertens, G., Mizokami, M., Murphy, D. G., Okamoto, H., Pawlotsky, J.-M., Penin, F., Sablon, E., Shin-I, T., Stuyver, L. J., Thiel, H.-J., . . . Widell, A. (2005). Consensus Proposals for a Unified System of Nomenclature of Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes *. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.20819

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.